青光眼患者对比敏感度模式的评价

M. A. Memon, Abdul Hameed Talpur, Mehak Nazeer, Muhammad Karim, Um-e-Farwa
{"title":"青光眼患者对比敏感度模式的评价","authors":"M. A. Memon, Abdul Hameed Talpur, Mehak Nazeer, Muhammad Karim, Um-e-Farwa","doi":"10.38106/lmrj.2022.4.1-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to measure the contrast sensitivity in different types of glaucoma patients. The patients for this study were identified using a non-probability convenient sampling method from 01st February 2020 to 30th August 2020. The diagnosis and sensitivity were tested using lea contrast sensitivity, Snellen visual acuity charts, trial box, and occluder. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20.0). Out of 60 patients, including 37 males and 23 females, between 16-80 years of age. 33 (55 %) patients were diagnosed with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma(POAG), 17 (28.3 %) patients with Primary Close Angle Glaucoma, 7 (11.7%) patients with Acute Closure Glaucoma(PCAG), and 3 (5%) patients with Secondary Glaucoma. Similarly, with glasses, 46 (76.7 %) patients had visual acuity 6/6 to 6/12, 11 (81.3%) patients had 6/18 to 6/36 and 3 (5 %) patients had 6/60. According to contrast sensitivity 30 (50%) patients had 1.25% (80%), 21 had 2.50% (40%) and 9 had 5% (20%). 15 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 13 subjects had 2.5 %( 40%) and 5 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in POAG. Around 11 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 4 subjects had 2.5 % (40) and 2 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in PCAG, 3 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 3 subjects had 2.5 % (40) and 2 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in PCAG. There was a reduction in contrast visual acuity with and without refraction. Most of the patients had variation at the level of Contrast Visual Acuity in POAG.","PeriodicalId":184438,"journal":{"name":"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the pattern of contrast sensitivity in glaucoma patients\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Memon, Abdul Hameed Talpur, Mehak Nazeer, Muhammad Karim, Um-e-Farwa\",\"doi\":\"10.38106/lmrj.2022.4.1-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to measure the contrast sensitivity in different types of glaucoma patients. The patients for this study were identified using a non-probability convenient sampling method from 01st February 2020 to 30th August 2020. The diagnosis and sensitivity were tested using lea contrast sensitivity, Snellen visual acuity charts, trial box, and occluder. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20.0). Out of 60 patients, including 37 males and 23 females, between 16-80 years of age. 33 (55 %) patients were diagnosed with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma(POAG), 17 (28.3 %) patients with Primary Close Angle Glaucoma, 7 (11.7%) patients with Acute Closure Glaucoma(PCAG), and 3 (5%) patients with Secondary Glaucoma. Similarly, with glasses, 46 (76.7 %) patients had visual acuity 6/6 to 6/12, 11 (81.3%) patients had 6/18 to 6/36 and 3 (5 %) patients had 6/60. According to contrast sensitivity 30 (50%) patients had 1.25% (80%), 21 had 2.50% (40%) and 9 had 5% (20%). 15 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 13 subjects had 2.5 %( 40%) and 5 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in POAG. Around 11 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 4 subjects had 2.5 % (40) and 2 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in PCAG, 3 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 3 subjects had 2.5 % (40) and 2 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in PCAG. There was a reduction in contrast visual acuity with and without refraction. Most of the patients had variation at the level of Contrast Visual Acuity in POAG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38106/lmrj.2022.4.1-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38106/lmrj.2022.4.1-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本前瞻性横断面研究旨在测量不同类型青光眼患者的对比敏感度。本研究的患者于2020年2月1日至2020年8月30日采用非概率方便抽样方法进行鉴定。采用对比敏感度、Snellen视力表、试验箱、咬合器检测诊断和敏感性。使用SPSS 20.0版本的社会科学统计软件包对数据进行分析。60例患者,男37例,女23例,年龄16-80岁。33例(55%)为原发性开角型青光眼,17例(28.3%)为原发性闭角型青光眼,7例(11.7%)为急性闭角型青光眼,3例(5%)为继发性青光眼。同样,配戴眼镜的46例(76.7%)患者视力为6/6 ~ 6/12,11例(81.3%)患者视力为6/18 ~ 6/36,3例(5%)患者视力为6/60。对比敏感度30例(50%)为1.25%(80%),21例为2.50%(40%),9例为5%(20%)。对比敏感度为1.25%(80%)者15例,2.5%(40%)者13例,5%(5%)者5例。PCAG对比敏感性1.25%(80%)11例,2.5%(40)4例,5% 2例,1.25%(80%)3例,2.5%(40)3例,5% 2例。有或无屈光的对比视力下降。大多数患者在POAG的对比视力水平上存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the pattern of contrast sensitivity in glaucoma patients
This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to measure the contrast sensitivity in different types of glaucoma patients. The patients for this study were identified using a non-probability convenient sampling method from 01st February 2020 to 30th August 2020. The diagnosis and sensitivity were tested using lea contrast sensitivity, Snellen visual acuity charts, trial box, and occluder. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20.0). Out of 60 patients, including 37 males and 23 females, between 16-80 years of age. 33 (55 %) patients were diagnosed with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma(POAG), 17 (28.3 %) patients with Primary Close Angle Glaucoma, 7 (11.7%) patients with Acute Closure Glaucoma(PCAG), and 3 (5%) patients with Secondary Glaucoma. Similarly, with glasses, 46 (76.7 %) patients had visual acuity 6/6 to 6/12, 11 (81.3%) patients had 6/18 to 6/36 and 3 (5 %) patients had 6/60. According to contrast sensitivity 30 (50%) patients had 1.25% (80%), 21 had 2.50% (40%) and 9 had 5% (20%). 15 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 13 subjects had 2.5 %( 40%) and 5 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in POAG. Around 11 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 4 subjects had 2.5 % (40) and 2 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in PCAG, 3 subjects had 1.25% (80%), 3 subjects had 2.5 % (40) and 2 subjects had 5% contrast sensitivity in PCAG. There was a reduction in contrast visual acuity with and without refraction. Most of the patients had variation at the level of Contrast Visual Acuity in POAG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信