{"title":"Giovanni Pontano’s De bello Neapolitano","authors":"Marta Celati","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents a critical study of Giovanni Pontano’s De bello Neapolitano, the historical account of the ‘conspiracy of the barons’ against Ferdinando of Aragon, king of Naples, and the war that followed the rebellion (1459–65). Pontano’s work is contextualized in the historical and cultural scenario of the Aragonese monarchy and in the humanist’s broader literary and political activity, as a historian, political and literary theorist, and royal secretary. In particular the De bello Neapolitano can be placed in the realm of ‘political historiography’, a genre that enjoyed considerable fortune in Italian Renaissance. Pontano’s work is inspired by different models, both classical and contemporary, and continues the tradition of Aragonese historiography (inaugurated by Valla, Facio, and Panormita). Moreover, the chapter examines the text from a political angle by investigating its connections with Pontano’s most significant political-theoretical treatises: De principe and De obedientia. The analysis illustrates how the humanist’s princely ideology and his theory of statecraft is framed by means of different works, through the interplay of historical narrative and theoretical speculation. In this productive literary interaction, the topic of internal political conflict occupies a prominent position and its treatment in Pontano’s works reveals a developing idea of political realism. Pontano provides a concrete model of an ideal state that is based on the principle of obedience and on the hierarchical relationship between different social components: the prince, the barons, and the common people, components that play a key function, both narrative and exemplary, also in the humanist’s historical work.","PeriodicalId":270500,"journal":{"name":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章对乔瓦尼·蓬塔诺(Giovanni Pontano)的《那不勒斯之战》(De bello napolitano)进行了批判性研究,这是一部关于“贵族阴谋”反对那不勒斯国王阿拉贡的费迪南多(ferdinand of Aragon)的历史叙述,以及叛乱(1459-65)之后的战争。Pontano的作品被置于阿拉贡君主制的历史和文化情境中,以及作为历史学家、政治和文学理论家以及皇家秘书的人文主义者更广泛的文学和政治活动中。特别是《那不勒斯的贝洛》可以被归入“政治史学”的范畴,这是一种在意大利文艺复兴时期享有可观财富的流派。Pontano的作品受到古典和当代不同模型的启发,并延续了阿拉贡史学的传统(由Valla, Facio和Panormita开创)。此外,本章从政治角度考察文本,考察其与蓬塔诺最重要的政治理论论文:《论原则》和《论服从》的联系。分析说明了人文主义者的君主意识形态和他的治国理论是如何通过不同的作品,通过历史叙事和理论推测的相互作用来构建的。在这种富有成效的文学互动中,内部政治冲突的话题占据了突出的地位,蓬塔诺作品中对内部政治冲突的处理揭示了政治现实主义思想的发展。蓬塔诺提供了一个理想国家的具体模型,它基于服从原则和不同社会成分之间的等级关系:王子,男爵和普通人,这些成分在人文主义者的历史著作中,无论是叙事还是示范,都起着关键作用。
This chapter presents a critical study of Giovanni Pontano’s De bello Neapolitano, the historical account of the ‘conspiracy of the barons’ against Ferdinando of Aragon, king of Naples, and the war that followed the rebellion (1459–65). Pontano’s work is contextualized in the historical and cultural scenario of the Aragonese monarchy and in the humanist’s broader literary and political activity, as a historian, political and literary theorist, and royal secretary. In particular the De bello Neapolitano can be placed in the realm of ‘political historiography’, a genre that enjoyed considerable fortune in Italian Renaissance. Pontano’s work is inspired by different models, both classical and contemporary, and continues the tradition of Aragonese historiography (inaugurated by Valla, Facio, and Panormita). Moreover, the chapter examines the text from a political angle by investigating its connections with Pontano’s most significant political-theoretical treatises: De principe and De obedientia. The analysis illustrates how the humanist’s princely ideology and his theory of statecraft is framed by means of different works, through the interplay of historical narrative and theoretical speculation. In this productive literary interaction, the topic of internal political conflict occupies a prominent position and its treatment in Pontano’s works reveals a developing idea of political realism. Pontano provides a concrete model of an ideal state that is based on the principle of obedience and on the hierarchical relationship between different social components: the prince, the barons, and the common people, components that play a key function, both narrative and exemplary, also in the humanist’s historical work.