{"title":"《辛白林》的识别过程","authors":"M. Smith","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is common for scholars to describe the recognition scene (anagnorisis) described as an event of moral reconciliation, but few have reflected on the philosophical stakes involved in grounding morality in what amounts to a device of poetics. Matthew J. Smith uses Cymbeline to demonstrate the continual relevance of theatrical recognition for the philosophical discourse on mutual recognition as represented by writers including Hegel, Levinas, and Ricoeur. Cymbeline gestures toward tragedy by staging failures of recognition but ultimately moves into the post-tragic through what Smith describes as a return to anagnorisis.","PeriodicalId":136313,"journal":{"name":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Course of Recognition in Cymbeline\",\"authors\":\"M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is common for scholars to describe the recognition scene (anagnorisis) described as an event of moral reconciliation, but few have reflected on the philosophical stakes involved in grounding morality in what amounts to a device of poetics. Matthew J. Smith uses Cymbeline to demonstrate the continual relevance of theatrical recognition for the philosophical discourse on mutual recognition as represented by writers including Hegel, Levinas, and Ricoeur. Cymbeline gestures toward tragedy by staging failures of recognition but ultimately moves into the post-tragic through what Smith describes as a return to anagnorisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
学者们通常将承认场景(anagnorisis)描述为道德和解的事件,但很少有人反思将道德根植于相当于诗学手段的哲学风险。马修·j·史密斯(Matthew J. Smith)用《辛白林》(Cymbeline)证明了戏剧认知与以黑格尔、列维纳斯和里科尔等作家为代表的关于相互认知的哲学话语之间的持续相关性。《辛白林》通过表现认不出悲剧,但最终进入了后悲剧时代,史密斯将其描述为回归anagnoisis。
It is common for scholars to describe the recognition scene (anagnorisis) described as an event of moral reconciliation, but few have reflected on the philosophical stakes involved in grounding morality in what amounts to a device of poetics. Matthew J. Smith uses Cymbeline to demonstrate the continual relevance of theatrical recognition for the philosophical discourse on mutual recognition as represented by writers including Hegel, Levinas, and Ricoeur. Cymbeline gestures toward tragedy by staging failures of recognition but ultimately moves into the post-tragic through what Smith describes as a return to anagnorisis.