在大流行最严重的Covid-19危重疾病期间放弃复苏努力的预测因素。

N. Mesfin, A. Han, Michael A. Garcia, S. Johnson, R. Wiener
{"title":"在大流行最严重的Covid-19危重疾病期间放弃复苏努力的预测因素。","authors":"N. Mesfin, A. Han, Michael A. Garcia, S. Johnson, R. Wiener","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: During the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been significant uncertainty and heightened fear regarding the poor prognosis of COVID-19 and the disproportionate impact on minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Prior studies have demonstrated that baseline characteristics including older age, white race, female gender, and poor functional status are all associated with the decision to forego resuscitative efforts during critical illness. We sought to understand if demographic characteristics are stronger predictors for the decision to forgo resuscitative efforts than comorbid condition or severity of critical illness during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all adults admitted to Boston Medical Center (BMC) ICU between March 1 and June 7 with confirmed Covid-19 infection. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: patients with code status conversion to DNAR and patients that remained full code during the entirety of their critical illness. Univariate analysis and logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with code status conversion. Results: A total of 281 patients were hospitalized in the ICU with COVID-19 infection and 70% (n = 198) remained full code while 29.5% (n = 83) instituted DNAR orders. Older age was associated with decision to institute DNAR order (65 years-old SD±15 v 58 years-old SD±15, p < 0.001). The other demographic factors including gender, race, language preference, and insurance status were not associated with decision to institute DNAR order. The comorbid conditions of cardiopulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, or malignancy were not associated with decision to institute DNAR. The intra-critical illness factors including need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR 5.2 95% CI 2.6-11.2), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR 3.8 95% CI 1.8-8) and admission SOFA score (5 SD ± 3.5 v 7 SD ± 4, p < 0.001) were associated with decision to institute DNAR order. Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic and height of uncertainty, factors associated with the decision to forgo resuscitative efforts are primarily intra-critical illness factors as opposed to baseline demographic characteristics. A larger multi-center study is required to confirm the findings from a single-center safety net hospital.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors to Forgo Resuscitative Efforts During Covid-19 Critical Illness at the Height of the Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"N. Mesfin, A. Han, Michael A. Garcia, S. Johnson, R. Wiener\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale: During the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been significant uncertainty and heightened fear regarding the poor prognosis of COVID-19 and the disproportionate impact on minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Prior studies have demonstrated that baseline characteristics including older age, white race, female gender, and poor functional status are all associated with the decision to forego resuscitative efforts during critical illness. We sought to understand if demographic characteristics are stronger predictors for the decision to forgo resuscitative efforts than comorbid condition or severity of critical illness during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all adults admitted to Boston Medical Center (BMC) ICU between March 1 and June 7 with confirmed Covid-19 infection. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: patients with code status conversion to DNAR and patients that remained full code during the entirety of their critical illness. Univariate analysis and logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with code status conversion. Results: A total of 281 patients were hospitalized in the ICU with COVID-19 infection and 70% (n = 198) remained full code while 29.5% (n = 83) instituted DNAR orders. Older age was associated with decision to institute DNAR order (65 years-old SD±15 v 58 years-old SD±15, p < 0.001). The other demographic factors including gender, race, language preference, and insurance status were not associated with decision to institute DNAR order. The comorbid conditions of cardiopulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, or malignancy were not associated with decision to institute DNAR. The intra-critical illness factors including need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR 5.2 95% CI 2.6-11.2), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR 3.8 95% CI 1.8-8) and admission SOFA score (5 SD ± 3.5 v 7 SD ± 4, p < 0.001) were associated with decision to institute DNAR order. Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic and height of uncertainty, factors associated with the decision to forgo resuscitative efforts are primarily intra-critical illness factors as opposed to baseline demographic characteristics. A larger multi-center study is required to confirm the findings from a single-center safety net hospital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:在Covid-19大流行的早期阶段,对Covid-19预后不良以及对少数民族和社会经济弱势群体的不成比例的影响存在很大的不确定性和加剧的恐惧。先前的研究表明,包括年龄较大、白人种族、女性和较差的功能状态在内的基线特征都与危重疾病期间放弃复苏努力的决定有关。我们试图了解在COVID-19大流行期间,人口统计学特征是否比合并症或危重疾病严重程度更能预测放弃复苏努力的决定。方法:对3月1日至6月7日在波士顿医学中心(BMC) ICU收治的所有确诊感染Covid-19的成年人进行回顾性研究。患者被分为两组:代码状态转换为DNAR的患者和在整个危重疾病期间保持完整代码的患者。进行单变量分析和逻辑回归,以确定与代码状态转换相关的变量。结果:共有281例COVID-19感染患者在ICU住院,其中70% (n = 198)保持完整代码,29.5% (n = 83)建立了DNAR订单。年龄越大与决定采用DNAR顺序相关(65岁SD±15 vs 58岁SD±15,p <0.001)。其他人口统计学因素包括性别、种族、语言偏好和保险状况与决定建立DNAR顺序无关。心肺疾病、慢性肾脏疾病或恶性肿瘤的合并症与决定采用DNAR无关。危重期疾病因素包括需要有创机械通气(IMV) (OR 5.2 95% CI 2.6-11.2)、需要持续肾脏替代治疗(OR 3.8 95% CI 1.8-8)和入院SOFA评分(5 SD±3.5 v 7 SD±4,p <0.001)与制定DNAR顺序的决定相关。结论:本初步研究表明,在Covid-19大流行的高峰期和不确定性的高峰期,与放弃复苏努力的决定相关的因素主要是危重疾病因素,而不是基线人口统计学特征。需要更大的多中心研究来证实单中心安全网医院的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors to Forgo Resuscitative Efforts During Covid-19 Critical Illness at the Height of the Pandemic.
Rationale: During the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been significant uncertainty and heightened fear regarding the poor prognosis of COVID-19 and the disproportionate impact on minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Prior studies have demonstrated that baseline characteristics including older age, white race, female gender, and poor functional status are all associated with the decision to forego resuscitative efforts during critical illness. We sought to understand if demographic characteristics are stronger predictors for the decision to forgo resuscitative efforts than comorbid condition or severity of critical illness during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all adults admitted to Boston Medical Center (BMC) ICU between March 1 and June 7 with confirmed Covid-19 infection. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: patients with code status conversion to DNAR and patients that remained full code during the entirety of their critical illness. Univariate analysis and logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with code status conversion. Results: A total of 281 patients were hospitalized in the ICU with COVID-19 infection and 70% (n = 198) remained full code while 29.5% (n = 83) instituted DNAR orders. Older age was associated with decision to institute DNAR order (65 years-old SD±15 v 58 years-old SD±15, p < 0.001). The other demographic factors including gender, race, language preference, and insurance status were not associated with decision to institute DNAR order. The comorbid conditions of cardiopulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, or malignancy were not associated with decision to institute DNAR. The intra-critical illness factors including need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR 5.2 95% CI 2.6-11.2), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR 3.8 95% CI 1.8-8) and admission SOFA score (5 SD ± 3.5 v 7 SD ± 4, p < 0.001) were associated with decision to institute DNAR order. Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic and height of uncertainty, factors associated with the decision to forgo resuscitative efforts are primarily intra-critical illness factors as opposed to baseline demographic characteristics. A larger multi-center study is required to confirm the findings from a single-center safety net hospital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信