复杂腕外伤的报销

J. Dunn, John P. Scanaliato, Clare K. Green, P. Rhee, L. Nesti
{"title":"复杂腕外伤的报销","authors":"J. Dunn, John P. Scanaliato, Clare K. Green, P. Rhee, L. Nesti","doi":"10.55576/job.v2i1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare Relative Value Unit (RVU)-based reimbursement of operative fixation of complex carpal trauma versus primary operative fixation of distal radius fractures.\nDesign: Database review.\nSetting: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database\nIntervention: Surgical treatment of complex carpal trauma and distal radius fracture.\nMain outcome measurement: Mean and median total work Relative Value Unit (wRVU), surgical time, wRVU/minute, reimbursement/minute, reimbursement/surgical case.\nResults: The 139 patients who underwent fixation of complex carpal trauma and 222 patients who underwent fixation of distal radius fractures were included in this study. The mean wRVUs were 10.56 for the complex carpal trauma group and 12.46 for the distal radius fracture group. Complex carpal trauma cases were an average of 31 minutes longer than distal radius fracture cases. Mean wRVU/minute (0.19 vs 0.14) and median wRVU/minute (0.18 vs 0.11) were higher for distal radius fracture cases than for complex carpal trauma cases (percent difference: mean 34%, median 62%). Lastly, the mean ($378.85) and median reimbursement ($383.29) per surgical case for complex carpal trauma was lower than that of the mean ($447.19) and median reimbursement ($516.08) of distal radius fractures.\n \nConclusions: Despite longer operative times and increased procedural complexity, surgical treatment of complex carpal trauma is reimbursed significantly less than surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. The authors advocate a threefold plan. First, the ACS may consider developing more clear guidelines on the definition of a hand surgeon. Second, hand surgeons must insert themselves into hospital policy making, particularly with call and consult management discussions. Finally, considering the three components of the RVU calculation (physician work, physician expertise, and liability), the management of complex carpal trauma is under-recognized and reimbursed. As such, the authors recommend consideration of these injuries to be recompensed commiserate with arthroplasty and orthopaedic trauma.\nLevel of Evidence: IV; Economic Analysis\nKeywords: Complex carpal trauma, relative value unit, wRVU, reimbursement, distal radius fracture\n(J Ortho Business 2022; Volume 1, Issue 1:pages 19-23)","PeriodicalId":152360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimbursement for Complex Carpal Trauma\",\"authors\":\"J. Dunn, John P. Scanaliato, Clare K. Green, P. Rhee, L. Nesti\",\"doi\":\"10.55576/job.v2i1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To compare Relative Value Unit (RVU)-based reimbursement of operative fixation of complex carpal trauma versus primary operative fixation of distal radius fractures.\\nDesign: Database review.\\nSetting: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database\\nIntervention: Surgical treatment of complex carpal trauma and distal radius fracture.\\nMain outcome measurement: Mean and median total work Relative Value Unit (wRVU), surgical time, wRVU/minute, reimbursement/minute, reimbursement/surgical case.\\nResults: The 139 patients who underwent fixation of complex carpal trauma and 222 patients who underwent fixation of distal radius fractures were included in this study. The mean wRVUs were 10.56 for the complex carpal trauma group and 12.46 for the distal radius fracture group. Complex carpal trauma cases were an average of 31 minutes longer than distal radius fracture cases. Mean wRVU/minute (0.19 vs 0.14) and median wRVU/minute (0.18 vs 0.11) were higher for distal radius fracture cases than for complex carpal trauma cases (percent difference: mean 34%, median 62%). Lastly, the mean ($378.85) and median reimbursement ($383.29) per surgical case for complex carpal trauma was lower than that of the mean ($447.19) and median reimbursement ($516.08) of distal radius fractures.\\n \\nConclusions: Despite longer operative times and increased procedural complexity, surgical treatment of complex carpal trauma is reimbursed significantly less than surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. The authors advocate a threefold plan. First, the ACS may consider developing more clear guidelines on the definition of a hand surgeon. Second, hand surgeons must insert themselves into hospital policy making, particularly with call and consult management discussions. Finally, considering the three components of the RVU calculation (physician work, physician expertise, and liability), the management of complex carpal trauma is under-recognized and reimbursed. As such, the authors recommend consideration of these injuries to be recompensed commiserate with arthroplasty and orthopaedic trauma.\\nLevel of Evidence: IV; Economic Analysis\\nKeywords: Complex carpal trauma, relative value unit, wRVU, reimbursement, distal radius fracture\\n(J Ortho Business 2022; Volume 1, Issue 1:pages 19-23)\",\"PeriodicalId\":152360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较基于相对价值单位(Relative Value Unit, RVU)的复杂腕外伤手术固定与桡骨远端骨折手术固定的报销情况。设计:数据库审查。背景:国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库干预:复杂腕外伤和桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗。主要观察指标:总工作量相对价值单位(wRVU)均值和中位数、手术时间、wRVU/分钟、报销/分钟、报销/手术例数。结果:本研究纳入了139例复杂腕外伤患者和222例桡骨远端骨折患者。复杂腕外伤组平均wRVUs为10.56,桡骨远端骨折组平均wRVUs为12.46。复杂腕外伤病例比桡骨远端骨折病例平均长31分钟。桡骨远端骨折患者的平均wRVU/分钟(0.19 vs 0.14)和中位wRVU/分钟(0.18 vs 0.11)高于复杂腕外伤患者(百分比差异:平均34%,中位62%)。最后,复杂腕外伤每例手术的平均(378.85美元)和中位报销(383.29美元)低于桡骨远端骨折的平均(447.19美元)和中位报销(516.08美元)。结论:尽管手术时间延长,手术复杂度增加,但手术治疗复杂腕外伤的报销明显低于桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗。作者主张一个三重计划。首先,美国外科学会可能会考虑制定更明确的手外科医生定义指南。其次,手外科医生必须参与医院的政策制定,特别是在电话和咨询管理讨论中。最后,考虑到RVU计算的三个组成部分(医生工作,医生专业知识和责任),复杂腕外伤的管理被低估和报销。因此,作者建议考虑关节置换术和骨科创伤对这些损伤进行补偿。证据等级:四级;关键词:复杂腕外伤,相对价值单位,wRVU,报销,桡骨远端骨折(J Ortho Business 2022;第一卷,第1期:第19-23页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reimbursement for Complex Carpal Trauma
Objectives: To compare Relative Value Unit (RVU)-based reimbursement of operative fixation of complex carpal trauma versus primary operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Design: Database review. Setting: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database Intervention: Surgical treatment of complex carpal trauma and distal radius fracture. Main outcome measurement: Mean and median total work Relative Value Unit (wRVU), surgical time, wRVU/minute, reimbursement/minute, reimbursement/surgical case. Results: The 139 patients who underwent fixation of complex carpal trauma and 222 patients who underwent fixation of distal radius fractures were included in this study. The mean wRVUs were 10.56 for the complex carpal trauma group and 12.46 for the distal radius fracture group. Complex carpal trauma cases were an average of 31 minutes longer than distal radius fracture cases. Mean wRVU/minute (0.19 vs 0.14) and median wRVU/minute (0.18 vs 0.11) were higher for distal radius fracture cases than for complex carpal trauma cases (percent difference: mean 34%, median 62%). Lastly, the mean ($378.85) and median reimbursement ($383.29) per surgical case for complex carpal trauma was lower than that of the mean ($447.19) and median reimbursement ($516.08) of distal radius fractures.   Conclusions: Despite longer operative times and increased procedural complexity, surgical treatment of complex carpal trauma is reimbursed significantly less than surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. The authors advocate a threefold plan. First, the ACS may consider developing more clear guidelines on the definition of a hand surgeon. Second, hand surgeons must insert themselves into hospital policy making, particularly with call and consult management discussions. Finally, considering the three components of the RVU calculation (physician work, physician expertise, and liability), the management of complex carpal trauma is under-recognized and reimbursed. As such, the authors recommend consideration of these injuries to be recompensed commiserate with arthroplasty and orthopaedic trauma. Level of Evidence: IV; Economic Analysis Keywords: Complex carpal trauma, relative value unit, wRVU, reimbursement, distal radius fracture (J Ortho Business 2022; Volume 1, Issue 1:pages 19-23)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信