本研究的目的是评估左旋布比卡因对下腹和下肢手术患者的影响。jose Carrasco Arteaga和Vicente Corral Moscoso医院。昆卡-厄瓜多尔,2020-2021年。

Jessica Maribel Reinoso Herrera, Angélica Patricia Bernal Asmal
{"title":"本研究的目的是评估左旋布比卡因对下腹和下肢手术患者的影响。jose Carrasco Arteaga和Vicente Corral Moscoso医院。昆卡-厄瓜多尔,2020-2021年。","authors":"Jessica Maribel Reinoso Herrera, Angélica Patricia Bernal Asmal","doi":"10.14410/2022.14.1.ao.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine is currently the anesthetic of choice in subarachnoid anesthesia; reducing the risk of cardiotoxicity, it provides a shorter time of motor and sensory block compared to bupivacaine, allowing faster recovery of motility. The aim of this study was to characterize subarachnoid anesthesia with levobupivacaine, in a study of patients aged 18 to 65 years, undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgery, at the Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso and Hospital de Especialidades José Carrasco Arteaga in Cuenca, Ecuador. METHODS: Observational, descriptive study. 276 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The anesthesiologist monitored the latency time, duration, level of block, and side effects of levobupivacaine. For qualitative variables, we presented frequencies and percentages, for quantitative variables we applied mean and standard deviation. Statistical associations between the variables were sought with Chi-square test, accepting statistical significance with a p value < 0.05. RESULTS: Most of patients were male, between 30 and 39 years old. The majority of patients were overweight, most classified as ASA II, and underwent emergency surgery. Sensory block latency time was 1 to 5 minutes in 57.2% of the sample. Regarding motor block, 8 out of 10 patients had the anesthetic effect in the range of 11 to 15 minutes. In more than half of the patients the duration of the sensitive block was > 200 minutes; most of participants reached a sensory block at T6. The duration of motor block varied between 81 and 160 minutes for 80.4% of the sample. One out of 10 patients had side effects. CONCLUSION: The average sensory latency time is 5.89 minutes and the average motor latency time is 12.69 minutes. The duration of sensory block is greater than 200 minutes in most patients. The higher the dose of levobupivacaine, the longer the sensory block lasted. Motor block duration was 131 ± 31.31 minutes on average. The differences in the sensitive latency time in relation to the use of fentanyl are not significant; on the contrary, there is a significant association between the duration of sensory block and fentanyl administration.","PeriodicalId":417745,"journal":{"name":"Revista Médica del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga","volume":"409 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estudio Descriptivo: Caracterización de la anestesia subaracnoidea con levobupivacaína en pacientes intervenidos por cirugía abdominal baja y miembro inferior. Hospitales José Carrasco Arteaga y Vicente Corral Moscoso. Cuenca – Ecuador, 2020-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Maribel Reinoso Herrera, Angélica Patricia Bernal Asmal\",\"doi\":\"10.14410/2022.14.1.ao.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine is currently the anesthetic of choice in subarachnoid anesthesia; reducing the risk of cardiotoxicity, it provides a shorter time of motor and sensory block compared to bupivacaine, allowing faster recovery of motility. The aim of this study was to characterize subarachnoid anesthesia with levobupivacaine, in a study of patients aged 18 to 65 years, undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgery, at the Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso and Hospital de Especialidades José Carrasco Arteaga in Cuenca, Ecuador. METHODS: Observational, descriptive study. 276 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The anesthesiologist monitored the latency time, duration, level of block, and side effects of levobupivacaine. For qualitative variables, we presented frequencies and percentages, for quantitative variables we applied mean and standard deviation. Statistical associations between the variables were sought with Chi-square test, accepting statistical significance with a p value < 0.05. RESULTS: Most of patients were male, between 30 and 39 years old. The majority of patients were overweight, most classified as ASA II, and underwent emergency surgery. Sensory block latency time was 1 to 5 minutes in 57.2% of the sample. Regarding motor block, 8 out of 10 patients had the anesthetic effect in the range of 11 to 15 minutes. In more than half of the patients the duration of the sensitive block was > 200 minutes; most of participants reached a sensory block at T6. The duration of motor block varied between 81 and 160 minutes for 80.4% of the sample. One out of 10 patients had side effects. CONCLUSION: The average sensory latency time is 5.89 minutes and the average motor latency time is 12.69 minutes. The duration of sensory block is greater than 200 minutes in most patients. The higher the dose of levobupivacaine, the longer the sensory block lasted. Motor block duration was 131 ± 31.31 minutes on average. The differences in the sensitive latency time in relation to the use of fentanyl are not significant; on the contrary, there is a significant association between the duration of sensory block and fentanyl administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Médica del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga\",\"volume\":\"409 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Médica del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14410/2022.14.1.ao.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Médica del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14410/2022.14.1.ao.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左旋布比卡因是目前蛛网膜下腔麻醉的首选麻醉剂;降低心脏毒性的风险,与布比卡因相比,它提供了更短的运动和感觉阻滞时间,允许更快地恢复运动。本研究的目的是在厄瓜多尔昆卡Vicente Corral Moscoso医院和de Especialidades jos Carrasco Arteaga医院对18至65岁接受下腹部和下肢手术的患者进行研究,以描述左布比卡因蛛网膜下麻醉的特征。方法:观察性、描述性研究。276例符合纳入标准的患者被纳入研究。麻醉师监测左布比卡因的潜伏期、持续时间、阻滞程度和副作用。对于定性变量,我们使用频率和百分比,对于定量变量,我们使用均值和标准差。采用卡方检验寻求变量间的统计学相关性,p < 0.05为显著性。结果:患者以男性为主,年龄在30 ~ 39岁之间。大多数患者体重超标,多数为ASA II级,并接受了紧急手术。57.2%的人感觉阻滞潜伏期为1 ~ 5分钟。在运动阻滞方面,10例患者中有8例在11 ~ 15分钟内有麻醉效果。超过一半的患者敏感阻滞持续时间> 200分钟;大多数参与者在T6达到了感觉阻滞。80.4%的样本的运动阻滞持续时间在81到160分钟之间变化。每10名患者中就有1人出现了副作用。结论:平均感觉潜伏期为5.89 min,平均运动潜伏期为12.69 min。大多数患者感觉阻滞持续时间大于200分钟。左旋布比卡因剂量越大,感觉阻滞持续时间越长。运动阻滞持续时间平均为131±31.31分钟。与芬太尼使用相关的敏感潜伏期差异不显著;相反,感觉阻滞持续时间与芬太尼给药之间存在显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estudio Descriptivo: Caracterización de la anestesia subaracnoidea con levobupivacaína en pacientes intervenidos por cirugía abdominal baja y miembro inferior. Hospitales José Carrasco Arteaga y Vicente Corral Moscoso. Cuenca – Ecuador, 2020-2021.
BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine is currently the anesthetic of choice in subarachnoid anesthesia; reducing the risk of cardiotoxicity, it provides a shorter time of motor and sensory block compared to bupivacaine, allowing faster recovery of motility. The aim of this study was to characterize subarachnoid anesthesia with levobupivacaine, in a study of patients aged 18 to 65 years, undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgery, at the Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso and Hospital de Especialidades José Carrasco Arteaga in Cuenca, Ecuador. METHODS: Observational, descriptive study. 276 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The anesthesiologist monitored the latency time, duration, level of block, and side effects of levobupivacaine. For qualitative variables, we presented frequencies and percentages, for quantitative variables we applied mean and standard deviation. Statistical associations between the variables were sought with Chi-square test, accepting statistical significance with a p value < 0.05. RESULTS: Most of patients were male, between 30 and 39 years old. The majority of patients were overweight, most classified as ASA II, and underwent emergency surgery. Sensory block latency time was 1 to 5 minutes in 57.2% of the sample. Regarding motor block, 8 out of 10 patients had the anesthetic effect in the range of 11 to 15 minutes. In more than half of the patients the duration of the sensitive block was > 200 minutes; most of participants reached a sensory block at T6. The duration of motor block varied between 81 and 160 minutes for 80.4% of the sample. One out of 10 patients had side effects. CONCLUSION: The average sensory latency time is 5.89 minutes and the average motor latency time is 12.69 minutes. The duration of sensory block is greater than 200 minutes in most patients. The higher the dose of levobupivacaine, the longer the sensory block lasted. Motor block duration was 131 ± 31.31 minutes on average. The differences in the sensitive latency time in relation to the use of fentanyl are not significant; on the contrary, there is a significant association between the duration of sensory block and fentanyl administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信