有用性未实现:对增值报表的性能评估

G. Donleavy
{"title":"有用性未实现:对增值报表的性能评估","authors":"G. Donleavy","doi":"10.1504/ijca.2015.072002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The opportunity to achieve a major turning point in accounting history was the publication of The Corporate in the UK in 1975. It recommended several new reports, but its recommendations were largely ignored. One of the recommended reports, however, the value added statement, has been adopted by a number of jurisdictions around the world with stakeholder accountability as a prime objective. This paper surveys the arguments for the value added statement being for the generality of statement users what the income statement and statement of financial position have for stockholders and bondholders alone. The actual use made of the statements around the world and their usefulness is then reviewed, and the reasons for a quite widespread disappointment are discussed. Finally, the paper relates the value added statement to the ruins of the labour theory of value and suggests future research to determine the contribution value added statements could make to determining the extent to which a corporation's results are the spoils of a zero sum game under oligopolistic conditions or value genuinely created for the industry or economy a whole.","PeriodicalId":343538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Accounting","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness unfulfilled: a performance review of value added statements\",\"authors\":\"G. Donleavy\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijca.2015.072002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The opportunity to achieve a major turning point in accounting history was the publication of The Corporate in the UK in 1975. It recommended several new reports, but its recommendations were largely ignored. One of the recommended reports, however, the value added statement, has been adopted by a number of jurisdictions around the world with stakeholder accountability as a prime objective. This paper surveys the arguments for the value added statement being for the generality of statement users what the income statement and statement of financial position have for stockholders and bondholders alone. The actual use made of the statements around the world and their usefulness is then reviewed, and the reasons for a quite widespread disappointment are discussed. Finally, the paper relates the value added statement to the ruins of the labour theory of value and suggests future research to determine the contribution value added statements could make to determining the extent to which a corporation's results are the spoils of a zero sum game under oligopolistic conditions or value genuinely created for the industry or economy a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Accounting\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijca.2015.072002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijca.2015.072002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

实现会计史上一个重大转折点的机会是1975年英国《公司》一书的出版。它建议了几份新的报告,但其建议在很大程度上被忽视了。然而,其中一份推荐的报告,即增值声明,已被世界各地的许多司法管辖区采用,并将利益相关者问责制作为主要目标。本文从报表使用者的通用性出发,调查了关于增值表的争论,而损益表和财务状况表仅对股东和债券持有人具有通用性。然后审查世界各地对这些发言的实际使用情况及其用处,并讨论引起普遍失望的原因。最后,本文将增加值报表与劳动价值论的废墟联系起来,并建议未来的研究,以确定增加值报表可以在多大程度上确定公司的结果是寡头垄断条件下零和博弈的战利品,还是为整个行业或经济真正创造的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness unfulfilled: a performance review of value added statements
The opportunity to achieve a major turning point in accounting history was the publication of The Corporate in the UK in 1975. It recommended several new reports, but its recommendations were largely ignored. One of the recommended reports, however, the value added statement, has been adopted by a number of jurisdictions around the world with stakeholder accountability as a prime objective. This paper surveys the arguments for the value added statement being for the generality of statement users what the income statement and statement of financial position have for stockholders and bondholders alone. The actual use made of the statements around the world and their usefulness is then reviewed, and the reasons for a quite widespread disappointment are discussed. Finally, the paper relates the value added statement to the ruins of the labour theory of value and suggests future research to determine the contribution value added statements could make to determining the extent to which a corporation's results are the spoils of a zero sum game under oligopolistic conditions or value genuinely created for the industry or economy a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信