toll样受体(TLR)2/6激动剂INNA-051在健康成人中的安全性和耐受性

S. White, C. Lemech, R. Hari, N. Kruger, G. McLachlan, C. Demaison, F. Mercuri
{"title":"toll样受体(TLR)2/6激动剂INNA-051在健康成人中的安全性和耐受性","authors":"S. White, C. Lemech, R. Hari, N. Kruger, G. McLachlan, C. Demaison, F. Mercuri","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a2598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE: INNA-051 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2/6 agonist delivered via intranasal spray, being developed for treatment of respiratory viral diseases. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that INNA-051 and analogues are effective against a variety of respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV- 2, influenza, and rhinovirus. INNA-051 induces a tissue-localized innate immune response with cytokine expression and infiltration of innate immune cells into the nasal epithelium that play a key role in viral clearance. The primary objective of this study (ACTRN12621000607875p) was evaluation of safety and tolerability in healthy adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study of single and multiple ascending INNA-051 intranasal doses, with the total dose split evenly across both nostrils. Sixty-four participants ages 18-55 were enrolled, with 5 cohorts (6 active:2 placebo/cohort) receiving single doses of 20μg, 60μg, 150μg, 300μg, or 600μg, and 3 cohorts (6 active:2 placebo/cohort) receiving 4 total doses of 60μg, 150μg, and 300μg administered every third day. Assessments included adverse events, clinical laboratories, peak inspiratory nasal flow (PINF), and peak expiratory flow (PEF).RESULTS: Sixtyfour participants (36 males:28 females) ages 19-55 years were enrolled. Preliminary blinded results demonstrate that INNA-051 was well tolerated across all single and multiple dose cohorts. Adverse events were predominantly mild, limited to the nasopharynx, and resolved within 24-48 hours. Across single dose cohorts, the most frequent events were nasal congestion/blockage (n=20), nasal erythema/inflammation (n=19), rhinorrhea (n=13) and headache (n=11). Except for the 20-μg cohort with only 2 reports of rhinorrhea, all other single dose cohorts had a similar incidence of the other adverse events with no obvious dose relationship. Across all 3 multiple dose cohorts, nasal erythema/inflammation (n=42) was most frequently reported, followed by nasal congestion/blockage (n=26), rhinorrhea (n=9), and headache (n=9), with no dose-dependent relationship. No participants withdrew from the study due to adverse events. There were no clinically significant changes in clinical chemistry and hematology laboratories across all single and multiple dose cohorts. No consistent decrease in post-dose PNIF assessments were observed, and there were no changes in PEF assessments to suggest lower respiratory tract airway response to intranasal INNA- 051.CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal INNA-051 was well tolerated up to single doses of 600μg and multiple doses of 300μg. Mild, self-limited nasal adverse events as described are possible indicators of tissue-localized innate immune response by INNA-051. Investigation of cytokine levels and gene expression of the intranasal epithelium are needed to specifically determine TLR2/6 engagement by INNA-051.","PeriodicalId":126856,"journal":{"name":"B31. IMMUNE CELLS AND INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DRIVING LUNG INJURY AND INFECTION - VIEWS FROM THE BENCH","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Tolerability of the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2/6 Agonist INNA-051 in Healthy Adults\",\"authors\":\"S. White, C. Lemech, R. Hari, N. Kruger, G. McLachlan, C. Demaison, F. Mercuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a2598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE: INNA-051 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2/6 agonist delivered via intranasal spray, being developed for treatment of respiratory viral diseases. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that INNA-051 and analogues are effective against a variety of respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV- 2, influenza, and rhinovirus. INNA-051 induces a tissue-localized innate immune response with cytokine expression and infiltration of innate immune cells into the nasal epithelium that play a key role in viral clearance. The primary objective of this study (ACTRN12621000607875p) was evaluation of safety and tolerability in healthy adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study of single and multiple ascending INNA-051 intranasal doses, with the total dose split evenly across both nostrils. Sixty-four participants ages 18-55 were enrolled, with 5 cohorts (6 active:2 placebo/cohort) receiving single doses of 20μg, 60μg, 150μg, 300μg, or 600μg, and 3 cohorts (6 active:2 placebo/cohort) receiving 4 total doses of 60μg, 150μg, and 300μg administered every third day. Assessments included adverse events, clinical laboratories, peak inspiratory nasal flow (PINF), and peak expiratory flow (PEF).RESULTS: Sixtyfour participants (36 males:28 females) ages 19-55 years were enrolled. Preliminary blinded results demonstrate that INNA-051 was well tolerated across all single and multiple dose cohorts. Adverse events were predominantly mild, limited to the nasopharynx, and resolved within 24-48 hours. Across single dose cohorts, the most frequent events were nasal congestion/blockage (n=20), nasal erythema/inflammation (n=19), rhinorrhea (n=13) and headache (n=11). Except for the 20-μg cohort with only 2 reports of rhinorrhea, all other single dose cohorts had a similar incidence of the other adverse events with no obvious dose relationship. Across all 3 multiple dose cohorts, nasal erythema/inflammation (n=42) was most frequently reported, followed by nasal congestion/blockage (n=26), rhinorrhea (n=9), and headache (n=9), with no dose-dependent relationship. No participants withdrew from the study due to adverse events. There were no clinically significant changes in clinical chemistry and hematology laboratories across all single and multiple dose cohorts. No consistent decrease in post-dose PNIF assessments were observed, and there were no changes in PEF assessments to suggest lower respiratory tract airway response to intranasal INNA- 051.CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal INNA-051 was well tolerated up to single doses of 600μg and multiple doses of 300μg. Mild, self-limited nasal adverse events as described are possible indicators of tissue-localized innate immune response by INNA-051. Investigation of cytokine levels and gene expression of the intranasal epithelium are needed to specifically determine TLR2/6 engagement by INNA-051.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"B31. IMMUNE CELLS AND INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DRIVING LUNG INJURY AND INFECTION - VIEWS FROM THE BENCH\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"B31. IMMUNE CELLS AND INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DRIVING LUNG INJURY AND INFECTION - VIEWS FROM THE BENCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a2598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B31. IMMUNE CELLS AND INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DRIVING LUNG INJURY AND INFECTION - VIEWS FROM THE BENCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a2598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理:INNA-051是一种toll样受体(TLR) 2/6激动剂,通过鼻内喷雾剂给药,正在开发用于治疗呼吸道病毒性疾病。临床前研究表明,INNA-051及其类似物对多种呼吸道病毒有效,包括SARS-CoV- 2、流感病毒和鼻病毒。INNA-051诱导组织定位的先天免疫反应,细胞因子表达和先天免疫细胞浸润到鼻上皮,在病毒清除中起关键作用。本研究(ACTRN12621000607875p)的主要目的是评估健康成人的安全性和耐受性。方法:这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的1期临床研究,采用单次和多次鼻腔给药,总剂量均匀分布在两个鼻孔。64名年龄在18-55岁的参与者入组,其中5个队列(6个有效组:2个安慰剂组/队列)接受单次剂量20、60、150、300或600μg, 3个队列(6个有效组:2个安慰剂组/队列)每3天接受4次总剂量60、150和300μg。评估包括不良事件、临床实验室、吸气鼻流量峰(PINF)和呼气流量峰(PEF)。结果:64名参与者(36名男性:28名女性),年龄19-55岁。初步盲法结果表明,INNA-051在所有单剂量和多剂量队列中耐受性良好。不良事件主要是轻微的,仅限于鼻咽部,并在24-48小时内消退。在单剂量队列中,最常见的事件是鼻塞/堵塞(n=20),鼻红斑/炎症(n=19),鼻漏(n=13)和头痛(n=11)。除20 μg组仅有2例鼻漏报告外,其他单剂量组其他不良事件发生率相似,且无明显剂量关系。在所有3个多剂量组中,最常见的报告是鼻红斑/炎症(n=42),其次是鼻塞/堵塞(n=26),鼻漏(n=9)和头痛(n=9),没有剂量依赖关系。没有参与者因不良事件退出研究。在所有单剂量和多剂量队列中,临床化学和血液学实验室没有临床显著变化。给药后PNIF评估没有一致下降,PEF评估也没有变化,表明鼻内INNA- 051对下呼吸道气道的反应。结论:在单次给药600μg和多次给药300μg的情况下,INNA-051鼻内耐受性良好。所描述的轻度、自限性鼻不良事件可能是INNA-051组织局部先天免疫反应的指标。为了明确确定INNA-051对TLR2/6的作用,需要研究鼻内上皮细胞因子水平和基因表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Tolerability of the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2/6 Agonist INNA-051 in Healthy Adults
RATIONALE: INNA-051 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2/6 agonist delivered via intranasal spray, being developed for treatment of respiratory viral diseases. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that INNA-051 and analogues are effective against a variety of respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV- 2, influenza, and rhinovirus. INNA-051 induces a tissue-localized innate immune response with cytokine expression and infiltration of innate immune cells into the nasal epithelium that play a key role in viral clearance. The primary objective of this study (ACTRN12621000607875p) was evaluation of safety and tolerability in healthy adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study of single and multiple ascending INNA-051 intranasal doses, with the total dose split evenly across both nostrils. Sixty-four participants ages 18-55 were enrolled, with 5 cohorts (6 active:2 placebo/cohort) receiving single doses of 20μg, 60μg, 150μg, 300μg, or 600μg, and 3 cohorts (6 active:2 placebo/cohort) receiving 4 total doses of 60μg, 150μg, and 300μg administered every third day. Assessments included adverse events, clinical laboratories, peak inspiratory nasal flow (PINF), and peak expiratory flow (PEF).RESULTS: Sixtyfour participants (36 males:28 females) ages 19-55 years were enrolled. Preliminary blinded results demonstrate that INNA-051 was well tolerated across all single and multiple dose cohorts. Adverse events were predominantly mild, limited to the nasopharynx, and resolved within 24-48 hours. Across single dose cohorts, the most frequent events were nasal congestion/blockage (n=20), nasal erythema/inflammation (n=19), rhinorrhea (n=13) and headache (n=11). Except for the 20-μg cohort with only 2 reports of rhinorrhea, all other single dose cohorts had a similar incidence of the other adverse events with no obvious dose relationship. Across all 3 multiple dose cohorts, nasal erythema/inflammation (n=42) was most frequently reported, followed by nasal congestion/blockage (n=26), rhinorrhea (n=9), and headache (n=9), with no dose-dependent relationship. No participants withdrew from the study due to adverse events. There were no clinically significant changes in clinical chemistry and hematology laboratories across all single and multiple dose cohorts. No consistent decrease in post-dose PNIF assessments were observed, and there were no changes in PEF assessments to suggest lower respiratory tract airway response to intranasal INNA- 051.CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal INNA-051 was well tolerated up to single doses of 600μg and multiple doses of 300μg. Mild, self-limited nasal adverse events as described are possible indicators of tissue-localized innate immune response by INNA-051. Investigation of cytokine levels and gene expression of the intranasal epithelium are needed to specifically determine TLR2/6 engagement by INNA-051.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信