{"title":"佛陀会说话吗Pāli?“佛空”与Pāli起源考察","authors":"Chipamong Chowdhury","doi":"10.3329/DUJL.V2I4.6899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally South and Southeast Buddhism, which we now call Theravada Buddhism, claims that the language of the Buddha is \"Pali\" and hence the language of their sacred texts (Tipitaka=three canons). In this essay, I investigate the notion of the Pali language by reconstructing existing Pali literatures and contemporary works on Pali studies. Among other issues, this investigation explores the following issues: the language (vacana) of the Buddha, the multilingualism and geopolitics, the home of Pali, and the origination of Pali. Key words: Buddhism; Pali language; Pali literatures DOI: 10.3329/dujl.v2i4.6899 Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics Vol.2(4) August 2009 pp.43-57","PeriodicalId":137374,"journal":{"name":"Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did the Buddha Speak Pāli? An Investigation of The Buddha-Vacana and Origins of Pāli\",\"authors\":\"Chipamong Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/DUJL.V2I4.6899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally South and Southeast Buddhism, which we now call Theravada Buddhism, claims that the language of the Buddha is \\\"Pali\\\" and hence the language of their sacred texts (Tipitaka=three canons). In this essay, I investigate the notion of the Pali language by reconstructing existing Pali literatures and contemporary works on Pali studies. Among other issues, this investigation explores the following issues: the language (vacana) of the Buddha, the multilingualism and geopolitics, the home of Pali, and the origination of Pali. Key words: Buddhism; Pali language; Pali literatures DOI: 10.3329/dujl.v2i4.6899 Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics Vol.2(4) August 2009 pp.43-57\",\"PeriodicalId\":137374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/DUJL.V2I4.6899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/DUJL.V2I4.6899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
传统上,南方和东南佛教,我们现在称之为小乘佛教,声称佛陀的语言是“巴利语”,因此他们的神圣文本(三藏=三经)的语言。在这篇文章中,我通过重构现存的巴利文文献和当代巴利文研究著作来研究巴利语的概念。在其他问题中,本调查探讨了以下问题:佛陀的语言(vacana),多语言和地缘政治,巴利语的故乡,以及巴利语的起源。关键词:佛教;巴利语语言;巴利文献DOI: 10.3329/dujl.v2i4.6899达卡大学语言学杂志Vol.2(4) August 2009 pp.43-57
Did the Buddha Speak Pāli? An Investigation of The Buddha-Vacana and Origins of Pāli
Traditionally South and Southeast Buddhism, which we now call Theravada Buddhism, claims that the language of the Buddha is "Pali" and hence the language of their sacred texts (Tipitaka=three canons). In this essay, I investigate the notion of the Pali language by reconstructing existing Pali literatures and contemporary works on Pali studies. Among other issues, this investigation explores the following issues: the language (vacana) of the Buddha, the multilingualism and geopolitics, the home of Pali, and the origination of Pali. Key words: Buddhism; Pali language; Pali literatures DOI: 10.3329/dujl.v2i4.6899 Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics Vol.2(4) August 2009 pp.43-57