矿山岩土风险指数的建立

Sanjive Narendranathan, M. Cheng
{"title":"矿山岩土风险指数的建立","authors":"Sanjive Narendranathan, M. Cheng","doi":"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_28_NARENDRANATHAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors have developed the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index (MGRI), which has been advanced to attribute tolerable thresholds of risk in a given transitional mine closure context. This paper presents the philosophy behind the development of the MGRI using a conceptual case study and sets out how the authors propose it could be applied by practitioners in particular scenarios only when assessing tolerable thresholds of risk. The reader should note that this approach is not intended to replace conventional engineering risk assessments, it is merely an alternative method in evaluating the ‘tolerability’ of elevated risk thresholds.","PeriodicalId":337751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index\",\"authors\":\"Sanjive Narendranathan, M. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_28_NARENDRANATHAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors have developed the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index (MGRI), which has been advanced to attribute tolerable thresholds of risk in a given transitional mine closure context. This paper presents the philosophy behind the development of the MGRI using a conceptual case study and sets out how the authors propose it could be applied by practitioners in particular scenarios only when assessing tolerable thresholds of risk. The reader should note that this approach is not intended to replace conventional engineering risk assessments, it is merely an alternative method in evaluating the ‘tolerability’ of elevated risk thresholds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_28_NARENDRANATHAN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_28_NARENDRANATHAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作者开发了矿山岩土风险指数(MGRI),该指数已被改进为在给定的过渡性矿山关闭环境中确定可容忍的风险阈值。本文通过一个概念性案例研究介绍了MGRI发展背后的理念,并阐述了作者如何建议从业人员仅在评估可容忍的风险阈值时才能在特定情况下应用它。读者应该注意到,这种方法并不打算取代传统的工程风险评估,它仅仅是评估风险阈值升高的“容忍度”的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index
The authors have developed the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index (MGRI), which has been advanced to attribute tolerable thresholds of risk in a given transitional mine closure context. This paper presents the philosophy behind the development of the MGRI using a conceptual case study and sets out how the authors propose it could be applied by practitioners in particular scenarios only when assessing tolerable thresholds of risk. The reader should note that this approach is not intended to replace conventional engineering risk assessments, it is merely an alternative method in evaluating the ‘tolerability’ of elevated risk thresholds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信