{"title":"条件简单时态网络动态一致性检验中的瞬时反应时间","authors":"Massimo Cairo, Carlo Comin, Romeo Rizzi","doi":"10.1109/TIME.2016.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conditional Simple Temporal Network CSTN is a constraint-based graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. Three notions of consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic-Consistency (DC) is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging. In order to address the DC-Checking problem, in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] we introduced ε-DC (a refined, more realistic, notion of DC), and provided an algorithmic solution to it. Next, given that DC implies ε-DC for some sufficiently small ε > 0, and that for every ε > 0 it holds that ε-DC implies DC, we offered a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction-time ε under which the two notions coincide. This delivered the first (pseudo) singly-exponential time algorithm for the DC-Checking of CSTNs. However, the ε-DC notion is interesting per se, and the ε-DC-Checking algorithm in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] rests on the assumption that the reaction-time satisfies ε > 0, leaving unsolved the question of what happens when ε = 0. In this work, we introduce and study π-DC, a sound notion of DC with an instantaneous reaction-time (i.e. one in which the planner can react to any observation at the same instant of time in which the observation is made). Firstly, we demonstrate by a counter-example that π-DC is not equivalent to 0-DC, and that 0-DC is actually inadequate for modeling DC with an instantaneous reaction-time. This shows that the main results obtained in our previous work do not apply directly, as they were formulated, to the case of ε = 0. Motivated by this observation, as a second contribution, our previous tools are extended in order to handle π-DC, and the notion of ps-tree is introduced, also pointing out a relationship between π-DC and HyTN-Consistency. Thirdly, a simple reduction from π-DC-Checking to DC-Checking is identified. This allows us to design and to analyze the first sound-and-complete π-DC-Checking procedure. Remarkably, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm remains (pseudo) singly-exponential in the number of propositional letters.","PeriodicalId":347020,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instantaneous Reaction-Time in Dynamic-Consistency Checking of Conditional Simple Temporal Networks\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Cairo, Carlo Comin, Romeo Rizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIME.2016.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conditional Simple Temporal Network CSTN is a constraint-based graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. Three notions of consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic-Consistency (DC) is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging. In order to address the DC-Checking problem, in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] we introduced ε-DC (a refined, more realistic, notion of DC), and provided an algorithmic solution to it. Next, given that DC implies ε-DC for some sufficiently small ε > 0, and that for every ε > 0 it holds that ε-DC implies DC, we offered a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction-time ε under which the two notions coincide. This delivered the first (pseudo) singly-exponential time algorithm for the DC-Checking of CSTNs. However, the ε-DC notion is interesting per se, and the ε-DC-Checking algorithm in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] rests on the assumption that the reaction-time satisfies ε > 0, leaving unsolved the question of what happens when ε = 0. In this work, we introduce and study π-DC, a sound notion of DC with an instantaneous reaction-time (i.e. one in which the planner can react to any observation at the same instant of time in which the observation is made). Firstly, we demonstrate by a counter-example that π-DC is not equivalent to 0-DC, and that 0-DC is actually inadequate for modeling DC with an instantaneous reaction-time. This shows that the main results obtained in our previous work do not apply directly, as they were formulated, to the case of ε = 0. Motivated by this observation, as a second contribution, our previous tools are extended in order to handle π-DC, and the notion of ps-tree is introduced, also pointing out a relationship between π-DC and HyTN-Consistency. Thirdly, a simple reduction from π-DC-Checking to DC-Checking is identified. This allows us to design and to analyze the first sound-and-complete π-DC-Checking procedure. Remarkably, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm remains (pseudo) singly-exponential in the number of propositional letters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2016.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2016.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
条件简单时态网络(CSTN)是一种基于约束的条件时态规划图形式。对于cstn和cstp,出现了三种一致性概念:弱、强和动态。动态一致性(DC)是最有趣的概念,但也是最具挑战性的概念。为了解决DC- checking问题,在[Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015]中,我们引入了ε-DC(一种更精确、更现实的DC概念),并提供了一种算法解决方案。其次,假设对于足够小的ε > 0, DC意味着ε-DC,并且对于每一个ε > 0, ε-DC意味着DC,我们对反应时间ε的临界值给出了一个锐利的下限分析,在这个临界值下,两个概念重合。这为cstn的dc检查提供了第一个(伪)单指数时间算法。然而,ε- dc概念本身就很有趣,[Comin和Rizzi, TIME 2015]中的ε- dc - checking算法基于反应时间满足ε >的假设,没有解决ε = 0时会发生什么的问题。在这项工作中,我们引入并研究了π-DC,一个具有瞬时反应时间(即计划者可以在观察的同一时刻对任何观察做出反应)的DC的合理概念。首先,我们通过反例证明π-DC不等于0-DC,并且0-DC实际上不足以模拟具有瞬时反应时间的直流。这表明,在我们以前的工作中得到的主要结果并不直接适用于ε = 0的情况。受此启发,作为第二项贡献,我们扩展了之前的工具来处理π-DC,引入了ps树的概念,并指出π-DC与HyTN-Consistency之间的关系。第三,将π-DC-Checking简化为DC-Checking。这使我们能够设计和分析第一个完整的π- dc校验程序。值得注意的是,该算法的时间复杂度在命题字母的数量上保持(伪)单指数。
Instantaneous Reaction-Time in Dynamic-Consistency Checking of Conditional Simple Temporal Networks
Conditional Simple Temporal Network CSTN is a constraint-based graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. Three notions of consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic-Consistency (DC) is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging. In order to address the DC-Checking problem, in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] we introduced ε-DC (a refined, more realistic, notion of DC), and provided an algorithmic solution to it. Next, given that DC implies ε-DC for some sufficiently small ε > 0, and that for every ε > 0 it holds that ε-DC implies DC, we offered a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction-time ε under which the two notions coincide. This delivered the first (pseudo) singly-exponential time algorithm for the DC-Checking of CSTNs. However, the ε-DC notion is interesting per se, and the ε-DC-Checking algorithm in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] rests on the assumption that the reaction-time satisfies ε > 0, leaving unsolved the question of what happens when ε = 0. In this work, we introduce and study π-DC, a sound notion of DC with an instantaneous reaction-time (i.e. one in which the planner can react to any observation at the same instant of time in which the observation is made). Firstly, we demonstrate by a counter-example that π-DC is not equivalent to 0-DC, and that 0-DC is actually inadequate for modeling DC with an instantaneous reaction-time. This shows that the main results obtained in our previous work do not apply directly, as they were formulated, to the case of ε = 0. Motivated by this observation, as a second contribution, our previous tools are extended in order to handle π-DC, and the notion of ps-tree is introduced, also pointing out a relationship between π-DC and HyTN-Consistency. Thirdly, a simple reduction from π-DC-Checking to DC-Checking is identified. This allows us to design and to analyze the first sound-and-complete π-DC-Checking procedure. Remarkably, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm remains (pseudo) singly-exponential in the number of propositional letters.