Raskita J.F. Surbakti
{"title":"ANALISIS HUKUM PENGGUNAAN SURAT KUASA YANG MELEBIHI TUJUANNYA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1189K/Pdt/2017 dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong Nomor 104//Pdt.G/2012/Pn. Cbn.)","authors":"Raskita J.F. Surbakti","doi":"10.51622/njlo.v3i1.414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Misuse of power of attorney in a civil case includes, among other things, if the power of attorney contains beyond the limit of authority granted by the power of attorney to the recipient of the power of attorney, so that the power of attorney can be used to commit a legal act that is inconsistent with or deviates from the intention or purpose of the person giving the power of attorney. power. The power of attorney is often a problem in view of the restrictions, legal consequences and protections that connect with third parties. The problem of power in this thesis is reviewed based on the decision No. 104 / PDT.G / 2012 / PN.Cbn and Decision Number 1189K / Pdt / 2017. The formulation of the research problem is: discussing the regulation of limiting the provision of power of attorney based on civil law in Indonesia, due to the legal agreement of the beneficiary that exceeds his authority and legal protection of third parties who suffer losses due to the use of a power of attorney beyond their authority The type of research used in this thesis is normative legal research, the nature of the research used is descriptive analytical research. \nThis study uses library data collection techniques (library research). The data analysis used in this thesis research is qualitative data analysis. The limitations on granting power of attorney in the Civil Code are seen in Article 1794 to Article 1798 of the Civil Code which explains the granting of power based on what the giver is responsible for with the substance of the power of attorney's wages, form of power, power of attorney, provisions for exercising power of attorney and whoever can receive power. \nDecision Number 1189K / Pdt / 2017, the power of attorney even in the form of apparent power of attorney made based on the receivables of the power of attorney is not allowed by the court to make a sale and purchase deed based on a power of attorney against him even though the power of attorney has a debt against him Decision No. 104 / PDT.G / 2012 / PN.Cbn explained that in relation to the legal position based on the results of the court punishing the power of attorney to return what is the right of the power of attorney is a form of proof of the power to bind the power of attorney as a form of agreement. The agreement that has been agreed upon is only to offer and find a buyer but is carried out in fact selling the object of the dispute. Third party protection is obtained based on Article 1491 of the Civil Code which reads: \"The coverage which is the obligation of the seller to the buyer is to guarantee two things, namely: first, control of the goods being sold in a safe and secure manner; second, for the existence of hidden defects in the goods, or in such a way as to issue a reason for the cancellation of the purchase ”.","PeriodicalId":443920,"journal":{"name":"Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v3i1.414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

民事案件中滥用委托书的行为,除其他外,包括委托书中包含超出委托书授予委托书受让人的权限,使委托书被用来实施与授予委托书人的意图或目的不一致或偏离的法律行为。权力。鉴于与第三方有关的限制、法律后果和保护,委托书往往是一个问题。本文以104 / PDT号决定为基础,对功率问题进行了回顾。G / 2012 / pn。Cbn和决定号1189K / Pdt / 2017。研究问题的提法是:探讨印尼基于民法对限制委托书规定的规制,由于受益人的法律约定超出其权限以及第三人因使用超出其权限的委托书而遭受损失的法律保护。本文所采用的研究类型为规范性法律研究,所采用的研究性质为描述性分析研究。本研究使用图书馆数据收集技术(图书馆研究)。本论文研究使用的数据分析是定性数据分析。《民法典》第1794条至第1798条对授予委托书的限制进行了说明,该规定根据委托书工资的实质、委托书的形式、委托书、行使委托书的规定以及谁可以接受委托书来解释授予委托书的责任。第1189K / Pdt / 2017号决定,法院不允许根据委托书的应收款项以表见委托书的形式订立基于委托书的买卖契约,即使委托书对他负有债务。第104 / Pdt号决定。G / 2012 / pn。Cbn解释说,在关系到法律立场的基础上,法院处罚委托书的结果是什么,委托书是一种证明权力的形式,对委托书作为一种协议形式具有约束力。所达成的协议只是提供和寻找买家,但实际上是出售争议的对象。《民法典》第1491条规定:“作为卖方对买方的义务的保险,是为了保证两件事,即:第一,以安全可靠的方式控制所出售的货物;二是针对货物存在隐蔽缺陷,或者以“出具取消购买理由”的方式办理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS HUKUM PENGGUNAAN SURAT KUASA YANG MELEBIHI TUJUANNYA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1189K/Pdt/2017 dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong Nomor 104//Pdt.G/2012/Pn. Cbn.)
Misuse of power of attorney in a civil case includes, among other things, if the power of attorney contains beyond the limit of authority granted by the power of attorney to the recipient of the power of attorney, so that the power of attorney can be used to commit a legal act that is inconsistent with or deviates from the intention or purpose of the person giving the power of attorney. power. The power of attorney is often a problem in view of the restrictions, legal consequences and protections that connect with third parties. The problem of power in this thesis is reviewed based on the decision No. 104 / PDT.G / 2012 / PN.Cbn and Decision Number 1189K / Pdt / 2017. The formulation of the research problem is: discussing the regulation of limiting the provision of power of attorney based on civil law in Indonesia, due to the legal agreement of the beneficiary that exceeds his authority and legal protection of third parties who suffer losses due to the use of a power of attorney beyond their authority The type of research used in this thesis is normative legal research, the nature of the research used is descriptive analytical research. This study uses library data collection techniques (library research). The data analysis used in this thesis research is qualitative data analysis. The limitations on granting power of attorney in the Civil Code are seen in Article 1794 to Article 1798 of the Civil Code which explains the granting of power based on what the giver is responsible for with the substance of the power of attorney's wages, form of power, power of attorney, provisions for exercising power of attorney and whoever can receive power. Decision Number 1189K / Pdt / 2017, the power of attorney even in the form of apparent power of attorney made based on the receivables of the power of attorney is not allowed by the court to make a sale and purchase deed based on a power of attorney against him even though the power of attorney has a debt against him Decision No. 104 / PDT.G / 2012 / PN.Cbn explained that in relation to the legal position based on the results of the court punishing the power of attorney to return what is the right of the power of attorney is a form of proof of the power to bind the power of attorney as a form of agreement. The agreement that has been agreed upon is only to offer and find a buyer but is carried out in fact selling the object of the dispute. Third party protection is obtained based on Article 1491 of the Civil Code which reads: "The coverage which is the obligation of the seller to the buyer is to guarantee two things, namely: first, control of the goods being sold in a safe and secure manner; second, for the existence of hidden defects in the goods, or in such a way as to issue a reason for the cancellation of the purchase ”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信