{"title":"国际私法中的礼让与正义的基本原则","authors":"James J. Edelman, Madeleine Salinger","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers the underlying rationale for the principle of comity in private international law. It explains the meaning and operation of a widely accepted limit to the principle which applies when comity runs contrary to fundamental principles of justice, by drawing on insights provided by Adrian Briggs in his lectures on comity to the Hague Academy of International Law. The essay uses the principle of privacy as a case study to assess whether new fundamental principles of justice might arise and, if so, how they might be recognised.","PeriodicalId":333808,"journal":{"name":"A Conflict Of Laws Companion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comity in Private International Law and Fundamental Principles of Justice\",\"authors\":\"James J. Edelman, Madeleine Salinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay considers the underlying rationale for the principle of comity in private international law. It explains the meaning and operation of a widely accepted limit to the principle which applies when comity runs contrary to fundamental principles of justice, by drawing on insights provided by Adrian Briggs in his lectures on comity to the Hague Academy of International Law. The essay uses the principle of privacy as a case study to assess whether new fundamental principles of justice might arise and, if so, how they might be recognised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Conflict Of Laws Companion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Conflict Of Laws Companion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Conflict Of Laws Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了国际私法中礼让原则的基本原理。通过借鉴阿德里安·布里格斯(Adrian Briggs)在海牙国际法学院(Hague Academy of International Law)关于礼让的讲座中提供的见解,解释了在礼让与正义的基本原则相违背时,适用于礼让的原则的广泛接受的限制的含义和操作。本文以隐私原则为个案研究,评估是否可能出现新的基本正义原则,如果出现,它们将如何得到认可。
Comity in Private International Law and Fundamental Principles of Justice
This essay considers the underlying rationale for the principle of comity in private international law. It explains the meaning and operation of a widely accepted limit to the principle which applies when comity runs contrary to fundamental principles of justice, by drawing on insights provided by Adrian Briggs in his lectures on comity to the Hague Academy of International Law. The essay uses the principle of privacy as a case study to assess whether new fundamental principles of justice might arise and, if so, how they might be recognised.