你会相信自己吗?论相互信任的长期稳定性

Philipp Schliffke
{"title":"你会相信自己吗?论相互信任的长期稳定性","authors":"Philipp Schliffke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1709467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preferences for reciprocity of the Falk-Fischbacher type are applied to a game of trust. After deriving the reciprocity equilibrium, the evolution of preferences is analysed showing that a medium level of reciprocity is evolutionary stable. If players exhibit different inclinations regarding positive and negative reciprocity, a medium level of positive reciprocity remains stable but negative reciprocity must vanish. In both cases, players should show a level of reciprocity such that they would exactly trust themselves. The evolutionary equilibrium is characterized neither by efficiency (besides perfect information) nor by equity, although equity is used as a reference standard.","PeriodicalId":113084,"journal":{"name":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Would You Trust Yourself? On the Long-Run Stability of Reciprocal Trust\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Schliffke\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1709467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preferences for reciprocity of the Falk-Fischbacher type are applied to a game of trust. After deriving the reciprocity equilibrium, the evolution of preferences is analysed showing that a medium level of reciprocity is evolutionary stable. If players exhibit different inclinations regarding positive and negative reciprocity, a medium level of positive reciprocity remains stable but negative reciprocity must vanish. In both cases, players should show a level of reciprocity such that they would exactly trust themselves. The evolutionary equilibrium is characterized neither by efficiency (besides perfect information) nor by equity, although equity is used as a reference standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Prosociality eJournal\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Prosociality eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1709467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1709467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

福克-费舍巴赫类型的互惠偏好适用于信任博弈。在导出互惠均衡后,对偏好的演化进行了分析,表明中等水平的互惠是进化稳定的。如果玩家在积极互惠和消极互惠方面表现出不同的倾向,那么中等水平的积极互惠会保持稳定,而消极互惠则会消失。在这两种情况下,玩家都应该表现出一定程度的互惠,这样他们才会完全信任自己。进化均衡的特征既不是效率(除了完全信息),也不是公平,尽管公平被用作参考标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Would You Trust Yourself? On the Long-Run Stability of Reciprocal Trust
Preferences for reciprocity of the Falk-Fischbacher type are applied to a game of trust. After deriving the reciprocity equilibrium, the evolution of preferences is analysed showing that a medium level of reciprocity is evolutionary stable. If players exhibit different inclinations regarding positive and negative reciprocity, a medium level of positive reciprocity remains stable but negative reciprocity must vanish. In both cases, players should show a level of reciprocity such that they would exactly trust themselves. The evolutionary equilibrium is characterized neither by efficiency (besides perfect information) nor by equity, although equity is used as a reference standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信