{"title":"对上帝存在的宗教论证的批判性审视:关于帕姆奎斯特的分析","authors":"Juyong Kim","doi":"10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"one is back ever further ad infinitum in the series of subjective determining bases. (Rel., 6:25) In this article, I critically examine the religious argument for the existence of God, which Palmquist formulated from Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. After showing the structure of the argument, I point the problematic point of the argument and focus on the concept of Gesinnung. The privateness of Gesinnung is problematized in the analysis of it, and I briefly suggest that an alternative account of the Gesinnung is possible. Yet I emphasize the advantage that this argument has compared to other competing arguments.","PeriodicalId":162215,"journal":{"name":"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Examination on the Religious Argument for God's Existence: Concerning Palmquist's Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Juyong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"one is back ever further ad infinitum in the series of subjective determining bases. (Rel., 6:25) In this article, I critically examine the religious argument for the existence of God, which Palmquist formulated from Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. After showing the structure of the argument, I point the problematic point of the argument and focus on the concept of Gesinnung. The privateness of Gesinnung is problematized in the analysis of it, and I briefly suggest that an alternative account of the Gesinnung is possible. Yet I emphasize the advantage that this argument has compared to other competing arguments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Critical Examination on the Religious Argument for God's Existence: Concerning Palmquist's Analysis
one is back ever further ad infinitum in the series of subjective determining bases. (Rel., 6:25) In this article, I critically examine the religious argument for the existence of God, which Palmquist formulated from Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. After showing the structure of the argument, I point the problematic point of the argument and focus on the concept of Gesinnung. The privateness of Gesinnung is problematized in the analysis of it, and I briefly suggest that an alternative account of the Gesinnung is possible. Yet I emphasize the advantage that this argument has compared to other competing arguments.