对上帝存在的宗教论证的批判性审视:关于帕姆奎斯特的分析

Juyong Kim
{"title":"对上帝存在的宗教论证的批判性审视:关于帕姆奎斯特的分析","authors":"Juyong Kim","doi":"10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"one is back ever further ad infinitum in the series of subjective determining bases. (Rel., 6:25) In this article, I critically examine the religious argument for the existence of God, which Palmquist formulated from Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. After showing the structure of the argument, I point the problematic point of the argument and focus on the concept of Gesinnung. The privateness of Gesinnung is problematized in the analysis of it, and I briefly suggest that an alternative account of the Gesinnung is possible. Yet I emphasize the advantage that this argument has compared to other competing arguments.","PeriodicalId":162215,"journal":{"name":"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Examination on the Religious Argument for God's Existence: Concerning Palmquist's Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Juyong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"one is back ever further ad infinitum in the series of subjective determining bases. (Rel., 6:25) In this article, I critically examine the religious argument for the existence of God, which Palmquist formulated from Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. After showing the structure of the argument, I point the problematic point of the argument and focus on the concept of Gesinnung. The privateness of Gesinnung is problematized in the analysis of it, and I briefly suggest that an alternative account of the Gesinnung is possible. Yet I emphasize the advantage that this argument has compared to other competing arguments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theological Research Institute of Sahmyook University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56035/tod.2020.22.1.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一系列主观的决定基础中,我们可以追溯到更早的无限。(雷尔书6:25)在这篇文章中,我批判性地考察了帕姆奎斯特从康德的《纯粹理性范围内的宗教》中阐述的关于上帝存在的宗教论点。在展示了论证的结构之后,我指出了论证的问题点,并将重点放在了gesisung的概念上。格西农的私密性在分析中受到质疑,我简要地提出格西农的另一种解释是可能的。然而,我要强调的是,与其他与之竞争的论点相比,这一论点具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Examination on the Religious Argument for God's Existence: Concerning Palmquist's Analysis
one is back ever further ad infinitum in the series of subjective determining bases. (Rel., 6:25) In this article, I critically examine the religious argument for the existence of God, which Palmquist formulated from Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. After showing the structure of the argument, I point the problematic point of the argument and focus on the concept of Gesinnung. The privateness of Gesinnung is problematized in the analysis of it, and I briefly suggest that an alternative account of the Gesinnung is possible. Yet I emphasize the advantage that this argument has compared to other competing arguments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信