{"title":"关于两个模拟基准的说明","authors":"D. House","doi":"10.1145/84222.84228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note presents the results of a comparative study done on the popular simulation languages SLAM and GPSS. The models that we tested were executed on a CDC Cyber 750, a multiprogramming system with 3770008 words of main memory and no virtual memory. A single server queueing model and a multiqueuing model for simulating a token ring local area network were used for the comparison. In addition to SLAM and GPSS, we also develop FORTRAN versions of the models to obtain an idea of how a low level model performs in comparison to a model constructed in a well developed simulation language. The note includes a discussion and some graphical results that may be useful to a modelling practitioner in planning a simulation study.","PeriodicalId":138785,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigsim Simulation Digest","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A note on two simulation benchmarks\",\"authors\":\"D. House\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/84222.84228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note presents the results of a comparative study done on the popular simulation languages SLAM and GPSS. The models that we tested were executed on a CDC Cyber 750, a multiprogramming system with 3770008 words of main memory and no virtual memory. A single server queueing model and a multiqueuing model for simulating a token ring local area network were used for the comparison. In addition to SLAM and GPSS, we also develop FORTRAN versions of the models to obtain an idea of how a low level model performs in comparison to a model constructed in a well developed simulation language. The note includes a discussion and some graphical results that may be useful to a modelling practitioner in planning a simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigsim Simulation Digest\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigsim Simulation Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/84222.84228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigsim Simulation Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/84222.84228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This note presents the results of a comparative study done on the popular simulation languages SLAM and GPSS. The models that we tested were executed on a CDC Cyber 750, a multiprogramming system with 3770008 words of main memory and no virtual memory. A single server queueing model and a multiqueuing model for simulating a token ring local area network were used for the comparison. In addition to SLAM and GPSS, we also develop FORTRAN versions of the models to obtain an idea of how a low level model performs in comparison to a model constructed in a well developed simulation language. The note includes a discussion and some graphical results that may be useful to a modelling practitioner in planning a simulation study.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
