确定借款人信誉的信用评分模型的开发

Amjad Ali, Muhammad Rafi
{"title":"确定借款人信誉的信用评分模型的开发","authors":"Amjad Ali, Muhammad Rafi","doi":"10.31645/2014.12.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explosive growth of data in banking sector is common phenomena. It is due to early adaptation of information system by Banks. This vast volume of historical data related to financial position of individuals and organizations compel banks to evaluate credit worthiness of clients to offers new services. Credit scoring can be defined as a technique that facilitates lenders in deciding to grant or reject credit to consumers. A credit score is a product of advanced analytical models that catch a snapshot of the consumer credit history and translate it into a numeric number that signify the amount of risks that will be generated in a specific deal by the consumer. Automated Credit scoring mechanism has replaced onerous, error-prone labour-intensive manual reviews that were less transparent and lacks statistical-soundness in almost all financial organizations. The credit scoring functionality is a type of classification problem for the new customer. There are numerous data classification algorithm proposed and each one has its pros and cons. This independent study focuses on comparing three data classification algorithms namely: Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network and Bagging, for credit scoring task. An extensive series of experiments are performed on three standard credit scoring datasets: (i) German credit dataset, (ii) Australian credit dataset and (iii) Pakistan credit dataset. One of the main contributions of this study is to introduced Pakistan credit dataset; it is collected from local credit repository, and transformed accordingly to be used in the study. The studies compare the experimental results of different selected algorithms for classification, their standard evaluation measures, performance on the three datasets, and conclude the major findings.","PeriodicalId":412730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Credit Scoring Model to Determine the Creditworthiness of Borrowers\",\"authors\":\"Amjad Ali, Muhammad Rafi\",\"doi\":\"10.31645/2014.12.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The explosive growth of data in banking sector is common phenomena. It is due to early adaptation of information system by Banks. This vast volume of historical data related to financial position of individuals and organizations compel banks to evaluate credit worthiness of clients to offers new services. Credit scoring can be defined as a technique that facilitates lenders in deciding to grant or reject credit to consumers. A credit score is a product of advanced analytical models that catch a snapshot of the consumer credit history and translate it into a numeric number that signify the amount of risks that will be generated in a specific deal by the consumer. Automated Credit scoring mechanism has replaced onerous, error-prone labour-intensive manual reviews that were less transparent and lacks statistical-soundness in almost all financial organizations. The credit scoring functionality is a type of classification problem for the new customer. There are numerous data classification algorithm proposed and each one has its pros and cons. This independent study focuses on comparing three data classification algorithms namely: Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network and Bagging, for credit scoring task. An extensive series of experiments are performed on three standard credit scoring datasets: (i) German credit dataset, (ii) Australian credit dataset and (iii) Pakistan credit dataset. One of the main contributions of this study is to introduced Pakistan credit dataset; it is collected from local credit repository, and transformed accordingly to be used in the study. The studies compare the experimental results of different selected algorithms for classification, their standard evaluation measures, performance on the three datasets, and conclude the major findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31645/2014.12.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31645/2014.12.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

银行业数据爆炸式增长是一个普遍现象。这是由于银行较早地适应了信息系统。与个人和组织的财务状况相关的大量历史数据迫使银行评估客户的信用价值,以提供新的服务。信用评分可以定义为一种技术,帮助贷款人决定授予或拒绝信贷给消费者。信用评分是高级分析模型的产物,它捕捉消费者信用历史的快照,并将其转换为数字,表示消费者在特定交易中将产生的风险量。在几乎所有的金融机构中,自动信用评分机制已经取代了繁重的、容易出错的、劳动密集型的、不那么透明且缺乏统计可靠性的人工审查。信用评分功能是新客户的一类分类问题。目前提出的数据分类算法很多,每一种算法都有其优缺点。本独立研究重点比较了信用评分任务中的三种数据分类算法:Naïve Bayes、Bayesian Network和Bagging。在三个标准信用评分数据集上进行了一系列广泛的实验:(i)德国信用数据集,(ii)澳大利亚信用数据集和(iii)巴基斯坦信用数据集。本研究的主要贡献之一是引入了巴基斯坦信贷数据集;从本地信用库中收集,并进行相应的转换以用于研究。本研究比较了所选择的不同分类算法的实验结果、标准评价指标、在三种数据集上的性能,并总结了主要发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Credit Scoring Model to Determine the Creditworthiness of Borrowers
The explosive growth of data in banking sector is common phenomena. It is due to early adaptation of information system by Banks. This vast volume of historical data related to financial position of individuals and organizations compel banks to evaluate credit worthiness of clients to offers new services. Credit scoring can be defined as a technique that facilitates lenders in deciding to grant or reject credit to consumers. A credit score is a product of advanced analytical models that catch a snapshot of the consumer credit history and translate it into a numeric number that signify the amount of risks that will be generated in a specific deal by the consumer. Automated Credit scoring mechanism has replaced onerous, error-prone labour-intensive manual reviews that were less transparent and lacks statistical-soundness in almost all financial organizations. The credit scoring functionality is a type of classification problem for the new customer. There are numerous data classification algorithm proposed and each one has its pros and cons. This independent study focuses on comparing three data classification algorithms namely: Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network and Bagging, for credit scoring task. An extensive series of experiments are performed on three standard credit scoring datasets: (i) German credit dataset, (ii) Australian credit dataset and (iii) Pakistan credit dataset. One of the main contributions of this study is to introduced Pakistan credit dataset; it is collected from local credit repository, and transformed accordingly to be used in the study. The studies compare the experimental results of different selected algorithms for classification, their standard evaluation measures, performance on the three datasets, and conclude the major findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信