诽谤

J. Baker
{"title":"诽谤","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the history of the tort of defamation. Although early slander actions are found in manorial courts, the common law at first regarded defamation as beyond its purview and as more appropriate for ecclesiastical courts. But ecclesiastical courts could not deal with accusations of temporal crime or award damages. Soon after 1500 actions on the case were brought for damages caused by injury to reputation, not only by accusations of crime but also by accusations affecting a profession or calling. After some qualms, they could also be brought for spiritual matters, such as unchastity, provided temporal damage was shown. The actions proved embarrassingly popular, and the courts devised ways of deterring plaintiffs, in particular the artificial construction of words in the mildest possible sense (in mitiori sensu). The distinction between libel and slander is explained. Finally, there are observations on libel in printed publications.","PeriodicalId":321735,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to English Legal History","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defamation\",\"authors\":\"J. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter addresses the history of the tort of defamation. Although early slander actions are found in manorial courts, the common law at first regarded defamation as beyond its purview and as more appropriate for ecclesiastical courts. But ecclesiastical courts could not deal with accusations of temporal crime or award damages. Soon after 1500 actions on the case were brought for damages caused by injury to reputation, not only by accusations of crime but also by accusations affecting a profession or calling. After some qualms, they could also be brought for spiritual matters, such as unchastity, provided temporal damage was shown. The actions proved embarrassingly popular, and the courts devised ways of deterring plaintiffs, in particular the artificial construction of words in the mildest possible sense (in mitiori sensu). The distinction between libel and slander is explained. Finally, there are observations on libel in printed publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Introduction to English Legal History\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Introduction to English Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to English Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章论述了诽谤侵权的历史。虽然早期的诽谤诉讼是在庄园法院进行的,但普通法最初认为诽谤超出了它的权限,更适合于教会法院。但教会法庭不能处理世俗犯罪的指控或赔偿损失。1500年之后不久,针对此案的诉讼因名誉受损而引起的损害赔偿,不仅包括对犯罪的指控,还包括对影响职业或职业的指控。在一些不安之后,他们也可以被带到精神上的问题,比如不贞,只要有暂时的损害。事实证明,这些行动令人尴尬地广受欢迎,法院想出了阻止原告的方法,特别是在最温和的意义上(在mitiori sense上)人为地构建词语。解释了诽谤和诽谤的区别。最后,对印刷出版物中的诽谤进行了评述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defamation
This chapter addresses the history of the tort of defamation. Although early slander actions are found in manorial courts, the common law at first regarded defamation as beyond its purview and as more appropriate for ecclesiastical courts. But ecclesiastical courts could not deal with accusations of temporal crime or award damages. Soon after 1500 actions on the case were brought for damages caused by injury to reputation, not only by accusations of crime but also by accusations affecting a profession or calling. After some qualms, they could also be brought for spiritual matters, such as unchastity, provided temporal damage was shown. The actions proved embarrassingly popular, and the courts devised ways of deterring plaintiffs, in particular the artificial construction of words in the mildest possible sense (in mitiori sensu). The distinction between libel and slander is explained. Finally, there are observations on libel in printed publications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信