关于女孩和扳手:女权主义政治,女性身体和男性行业

G. Clarsen
{"title":"关于女孩和扳手:女权主义政治,女性身体和男性行业","authors":"G. Clarsen","doi":"10.22459/er.2019.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In mid-2017, a federal Senate Committee inquiring into gender segregation in the Australian workforce tabled its final report, after nine months of deliberation.1 The committee was set up to investigate ongoing industrial and occupational gender segregation in Australia, its economic consequences for women and to recommend approaches for addressing it. The aims are wearingly familiar. How many such inquiries have been held at state and federal level, I wonder, following feminists’ renewed activism around women’s employment since the 1970s? How many individuals, organisations and agencies have undertaken research, collated data, compiled reports and volunteered their time to table submissions? How many research papers and reports languish in archives and desk drawers around the nation? What, indeed, will be the fate of this latest Senate Committee report?","PeriodicalId":384625,"journal":{"name":"Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality and Culture in 1970s Australia","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of girls and spanners: Feminist politics, women’s bodies and the male trades\",\"authors\":\"G. Clarsen\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/er.2019.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In mid-2017, a federal Senate Committee inquiring into gender segregation in the Australian workforce tabled its final report, after nine months of deliberation.1 The committee was set up to investigate ongoing industrial and occupational gender segregation in Australia, its economic consequences for women and to recommend approaches for addressing it. The aims are wearingly familiar. How many such inquiries have been held at state and federal level, I wonder, following feminists’ renewed activism around women’s employment since the 1970s? How many individuals, organisations and agencies have undertaken research, collated data, compiled reports and volunteered their time to table submissions? How many research papers and reports languish in archives and desk drawers around the nation? What, indeed, will be the fate of this latest Senate Committee report?\",\"PeriodicalId\":384625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality and Culture in 1970s Australia\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality and Culture in 1970s Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/er.2019.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality and Culture in 1970s Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/er.2019.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2017年年中,经过9个月的审议,联邦参议院委员会对澳大利亚劳动力中的性别隔离问题进行了调查,并提交了最终报告设立该委员会的目的是调查澳大利亚目前的工业和职业性别隔离及其对妇女的经济影响,并就解决这一问题的办法提出建议。其目标已令人厌倦地熟悉。我想知道,自上世纪70年代以来,随着女权主义者围绕女性就业问题的新一轮行动,在州和联邦一级进行了多少这样的调查?有多少个人、组织和机构进行了研究,整理了数据,编写了报告,并自愿花时间提交了意见书?全国有多少研究论文和报告在档案馆和书桌抽屉里枯萎?参议院委员会这份最新报告的命运究竟如何?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of girls and spanners: Feminist politics, women’s bodies and the male trades
In mid-2017, a federal Senate Committee inquiring into gender segregation in the Australian workforce tabled its final report, after nine months of deliberation.1 The committee was set up to investigate ongoing industrial and occupational gender segregation in Australia, its economic consequences for women and to recommend approaches for addressing it. The aims are wearingly familiar. How many such inquiries have been held at state and federal level, I wonder, following feminists’ renewed activism around women’s employment since the 1970s? How many individuals, organisations and agencies have undertaken research, collated data, compiled reports and volunteered their time to table submissions? How many research papers and reports languish in archives and desk drawers around the nation? What, indeed, will be the fate of this latest Senate Committee report?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信