基于瑞利信道的两种典型中继选择策略的BEP性能

Shaoling Hu, Xuanli Wu, Zhongzhao Zhang
{"title":"基于瑞利信道的两种典型中继选择策略的BEP性能","authors":"Shaoling Hu, Xuanli Wu, Zhongzhao Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICCI-CC.2015.7259418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we provide an analysis of bit error probability (BEP) of two typical relay selection strategies based on threshold-based selection cooperation in detail, at arbitrary signal to noise ratios (SNRs) and number of available relays. We assume that all relays adopt decode-and forward (DF) scheme and all channels follow the Rayleigh fading. One of these two typical strategies has the best the source-to-relay channel (FHSC) and the other has the best the relay-to-destination channel (SHSC). Usually, an approximation will be taken when the selected relay does a wrong decoding. But in this paper, both the situations in which the data, at the relay node, are decoded correctly and not are taken into consideration, precisely. Numerical results demonstrate that when the threshold is low, the source-to-destination link is well and the SNR is relatively high, FHSC will outperform SHSC; otherwise, SHSC will have an advantage over FHSC.","PeriodicalId":167843,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BEP performance of two typical relay selection strategies based on Rayleigh channel\",\"authors\":\"Shaoling Hu, Xuanli Wu, Zhongzhao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCI-CC.2015.7259418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we provide an analysis of bit error probability (BEP) of two typical relay selection strategies based on threshold-based selection cooperation in detail, at arbitrary signal to noise ratios (SNRs) and number of available relays. We assume that all relays adopt decode-and forward (DF) scheme and all channels follow the Rayleigh fading. One of these two typical strategies has the best the source-to-relay channel (FHSC) and the other has the best the relay-to-destination channel (SHSC). Usually, an approximation will be taken when the selected relay does a wrong decoding. But in this paper, both the situations in which the data, at the relay node, are decoded correctly and not are taken into consideration, precisely. Numerical results demonstrate that when the threshold is low, the source-to-destination link is well and the SNR is relatively high, FHSC will outperform SHSC; otherwise, SHSC will have an advantage over FHSC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCI-CC.2015.7259418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCI-CC.2015.7259418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们详细分析了在任意信噪比(SNRs)和可用继电器数量下,基于阈值选择合作的两种典型中继选择策略的误码率(BEP)。我们假设所有中继都采用译码转发(DF)方案,所有信道都遵循瑞利衰落。这两种典型策略中,一种具有最佳的源到中继信道(FHSC),另一种具有最佳的中继到目标信道(SHSC)。通常,当所选中继进行错误解码时,将采取近似方法。但本文精确地考虑了中继节点上数据正确解码和不解码的两种情况。数值结果表明,当阈值较低、源到目的链路良好、信噪比较高时,FHSC优于SHSC;否则,SHSC将比FHSC具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BEP performance of two typical relay selection strategies based on Rayleigh channel
In this paper, we provide an analysis of bit error probability (BEP) of two typical relay selection strategies based on threshold-based selection cooperation in detail, at arbitrary signal to noise ratios (SNRs) and number of available relays. We assume that all relays adopt decode-and forward (DF) scheme and all channels follow the Rayleigh fading. One of these two typical strategies has the best the source-to-relay channel (FHSC) and the other has the best the relay-to-destination channel (SHSC). Usually, an approximation will be taken when the selected relay does a wrong decoding. But in this paper, both the situations in which the data, at the relay node, are decoded correctly and not are taken into consideration, precisely. Numerical results demonstrate that when the threshold is low, the source-to-destination link is well and the SNR is relatively high, FHSC will outperform SHSC; otherwise, SHSC will have an advantage over FHSC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信