论英国合同法中诚信的一般概念

Celina Esther V. Cua
{"title":"论英国合同法中诚信的一般概念","authors":"Celina Esther V. Cua","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2297037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English law has time and again denounced the existence of an overriding principle of good faith in its jurisdiction. Contrary to its civil law counterparts in Europe that embrace the general principle of good faith, it has chosen only to apply good faith in a piecemeal fashion and for specific areas. It asserts that the general principle of good faith is totally repugnant to the fundamentals of its legal system that favors creating incremental and specific solutions to legal issues, that adheres to the legal principle of party autonomy and holds sacred legal certainty. It is adamant that it does not need a general principle of good faith for it has its own homegrown rules to ensure that justice, fairness and reasonableness prevails in its legal system. In the recent years, the unwavering position of English law against good faith is continuously being tested. For one, the duty of good faith has found its way into English law via various European Union harmonisation instruments such as The Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 implementing Council Directive 86/653/EEC and The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999 implementing Council Directive 93/13/EEC, and with more harmonisation efforts expected in the near future with current talks of a European Sales Code and the presence of Principles of European Contract Law by the Lando Commission. For another, the current economy has already shifted from a domestic concern into a global one. Consequently, contracts at this day and age cease to be a national affair. This means that the good faith principle, which exists in most countries with civil and mixed legal systems making up the majority of not only European countries but the rest of the world, will continuously govern or form part of many contracts touching English law whether it likes it or not.Moreover, the growing acceptance of the principle of good faith in other common law countries has attracted many writings by English law scholars in the recent years and this has also inspired recent English court decisions to give good faith a second look or even impute it in contractual obligations. In fact, Longmore LJ expressed his sentiment to reconsider the House of Lords’ dictum in Walford v. Miles citing Lord Steyn who criticised such narrow approach. Lord Steyn even stated that the principle of good faith is not a world of difference from English law’s doctrine of reasonable expectations of the parties and that duties of good faith, when imposed on the parties, can easily be accommodated by English law. Some authors suggest that English law’s often resort to the implication of terms and other legal doctrines that give more emphasis to party loyalty, the protection of reliance, cooperation, consideration of the other party’s interest, and substantive fairness, signals its movement away from the will theory and thus ready to revive the ethical foundations of contract law existing before the 19th century. With all the foregoing developments on the principle of good faith in English law and its continuous growing influence, it is time to revisit whether English law’s open denunciation of a general principle of good faith remains true today. English law is described to be a dynamic legal system which always transforms to meet the needs of the times and to create conditions conducive for growth and development. Given the current global economy, the need to adapt to the European and global dimension of contract law carrying more complex transactions and relationships which renders the old and simple system of English contract law no longer sufficient to determine the parties’ intricate contractual obligations and their manner of performance, is English law now ready to abandon its headstrong position that it does not accept the general duty of good faith and is in fact heading towards this direction in contract law? The objective of this work is to answer this question by comparing the treatment and the level of acceptance of good faith in prominent European civil law systems, common law systems and of course, in English law. It will take into account recent developments in English law and with these, benchmark the current level of acceptance of good faith by English law and determine whether it is going towards a general principle or not.","PeriodicalId":430410,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a General Notion of Good Faith in English Contract Law\",\"authors\":\"Celina Esther V. Cua\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2297037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English law has time and again denounced the existence of an overriding principle of good faith in its jurisdiction. Contrary to its civil law counterparts in Europe that embrace the general principle of good faith, it has chosen only to apply good faith in a piecemeal fashion and for specific areas. It asserts that the general principle of good faith is totally repugnant to the fundamentals of its legal system that favors creating incremental and specific solutions to legal issues, that adheres to the legal principle of party autonomy and holds sacred legal certainty. It is adamant that it does not need a general principle of good faith for it has its own homegrown rules to ensure that justice, fairness and reasonableness prevails in its legal system. In the recent years, the unwavering position of English law against good faith is continuously being tested. For one, the duty of good faith has found its way into English law via various European Union harmonisation instruments such as The Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 implementing Council Directive 86/653/EEC and The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999 implementing Council Directive 93/13/EEC, and with more harmonisation efforts expected in the near future with current talks of a European Sales Code and the presence of Principles of European Contract Law by the Lando Commission. For another, the current economy has already shifted from a domestic concern into a global one. Consequently, contracts at this day and age cease to be a national affair. This means that the good faith principle, which exists in most countries with civil and mixed legal systems making up the majority of not only European countries but the rest of the world, will continuously govern or form part of many contracts touching English law whether it likes it or not.Moreover, the growing acceptance of the principle of good faith in other common law countries has attracted many writings by English law scholars in the recent years and this has also inspired recent English court decisions to give good faith a second look or even impute it in contractual obligations. In fact, Longmore LJ expressed his sentiment to reconsider the House of Lords’ dictum in Walford v. Miles citing Lord Steyn who criticised such narrow approach. Lord Steyn even stated that the principle of good faith is not a world of difference from English law’s doctrine of reasonable expectations of the parties and that duties of good faith, when imposed on the parties, can easily be accommodated by English law. Some authors suggest that English law’s often resort to the implication of terms and other legal doctrines that give more emphasis to party loyalty, the protection of reliance, cooperation, consideration of the other party’s interest, and substantive fairness, signals its movement away from the will theory and thus ready to revive the ethical foundations of contract law existing before the 19th century. With all the foregoing developments on the principle of good faith in English law and its continuous growing influence, it is time to revisit whether English law’s open denunciation of a general principle of good faith remains true today. English law is described to be a dynamic legal system which always transforms to meet the needs of the times and to create conditions conducive for growth and development. Given the current global economy, the need to adapt to the European and global dimension of contract law carrying more complex transactions and relationships which renders the old and simple system of English contract law no longer sufficient to determine the parties’ intricate contractual obligations and their manner of performance, is English law now ready to abandon its headstrong position that it does not accept the general duty of good faith and is in fact heading towards this direction in contract law? The objective of this work is to answer this question by comparing the treatment and the level of acceptance of good faith in prominent European civil law systems, common law systems and of course, in English law. It will take into account recent developments in English law and with these, benchmark the current level of acceptance of good faith by English law and determine whether it is going towards a general principle or not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2297037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2297037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国法律一再谴责在其管辖范围内存在着压倒一切的诚信原则。与欧洲的民法同行接受诚信的一般原则相反,它选择只以零零碎碎的方式和在特定领域适用诚信。它声称,诚信的一般原则完全违背其法律制度的基本原则,该法律制度赞成为法律问题创造渐进和具体的解决办法,坚持当事人自治的法律原则,并持有神圣的法律确定性。中国坚持认为,中国不需要普遍的诚信原则,因为中国有自己的规则,以确保其法律体系中公正、公平和合理。近年来,英国法律反对诚信的坚定立场不断受到考验。首先,诚信义务已通过各种欧盟协调文书进入英国法律,如执行理事会指令86/653/EEC的1993年《商业代理人(理事会指令)条例》和执行理事会指令93/13/EEC的1999年《消费者合同中的不公平条款条例》。预计在不久的将来会有更多的协调工作,目前正在讨论欧洲销售法典和兰多委员会制定的欧洲合同法原则。另一方面,当前的经济已经从国内问题转变为全球问题。因此,在这个时代,合同不再是国家事务。这意味着,无论英国法律是否愿意,存在于大多数民法和混合法系国家(不仅是欧洲国家,而且是世界其他地区的大多数)的诚信原则,将继续支配或构成许多涉及英国法律的合同的一部分。此外,其他普通法国家对诚信原则的接受程度越来越高,近年来吸引了英国法律学者的许多著作,这也启发了最近英国法院的判决,重新审视诚信原则,甚至将其归咎于合同义务。事实上,Longmore LJ在Walford v. Miles案中引用了批评这种狭隘方法的Lord Steyn的话,表达了他对重新考虑上议院的格言的看法。斯泰恩勋爵甚至表示,诚信原则与英国法律中当事人的合理期望原则并无天各一方之别,而当对当事人施加诚信义务时,英国法律可以很容易地予以适应。一些作者认为,英国法经常诉诸于条款的含义和其他法律理论,这些法律理论更加强调当事人的忠诚、对信赖的保护、合作、考虑对方的利益和实质性的公平,这标志着它正在远离意志理论,从而准备恢复19世纪以前存在的合同法的伦理基础。鉴于英国法律中诚信原则的所有上述发展及其不断增长的影响,现在是时候重新审视英国法律对一般诚信原则的公开谴责今天是否仍然正确了。英国法律被描述为一个动态的法律体系,它总是根据时代的需要而变化,并创造有利于成长和发展的条件。鉴于当前的全球经济,需要适应欧洲和全球合同法的维度,其中包含更复杂的交易和关系,这使得旧的和简单的英国合同法系统不再足以确定各方复杂的合同义务及其履行方式,英国法律现在是否准备放弃其顽固的立场,即它不接受普遍的诚信义务,实际上正在朝着合同法的这个方向发展?本研究的目的是通过比较欧洲大陆法系、英美法系,当然还有英国法系对诚信的处理和接受程度,来回答这个问题。它将考虑到英国法律的最新发展,并以此为基准,衡量英国法律对诚信的当前接受水平,并确定它是否正在走向一般原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a General Notion of Good Faith in English Contract Law
English law has time and again denounced the existence of an overriding principle of good faith in its jurisdiction. Contrary to its civil law counterparts in Europe that embrace the general principle of good faith, it has chosen only to apply good faith in a piecemeal fashion and for specific areas. It asserts that the general principle of good faith is totally repugnant to the fundamentals of its legal system that favors creating incremental and specific solutions to legal issues, that adheres to the legal principle of party autonomy and holds sacred legal certainty. It is adamant that it does not need a general principle of good faith for it has its own homegrown rules to ensure that justice, fairness and reasonableness prevails in its legal system. In the recent years, the unwavering position of English law against good faith is continuously being tested. For one, the duty of good faith has found its way into English law via various European Union harmonisation instruments such as The Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 implementing Council Directive 86/653/EEC and The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999 implementing Council Directive 93/13/EEC, and with more harmonisation efforts expected in the near future with current talks of a European Sales Code and the presence of Principles of European Contract Law by the Lando Commission. For another, the current economy has already shifted from a domestic concern into a global one. Consequently, contracts at this day and age cease to be a national affair. This means that the good faith principle, which exists in most countries with civil and mixed legal systems making up the majority of not only European countries but the rest of the world, will continuously govern or form part of many contracts touching English law whether it likes it or not.Moreover, the growing acceptance of the principle of good faith in other common law countries has attracted many writings by English law scholars in the recent years and this has also inspired recent English court decisions to give good faith a second look or even impute it in contractual obligations. In fact, Longmore LJ expressed his sentiment to reconsider the House of Lords’ dictum in Walford v. Miles citing Lord Steyn who criticised such narrow approach. Lord Steyn even stated that the principle of good faith is not a world of difference from English law’s doctrine of reasonable expectations of the parties and that duties of good faith, when imposed on the parties, can easily be accommodated by English law. Some authors suggest that English law’s often resort to the implication of terms and other legal doctrines that give more emphasis to party loyalty, the protection of reliance, cooperation, consideration of the other party’s interest, and substantive fairness, signals its movement away from the will theory and thus ready to revive the ethical foundations of contract law existing before the 19th century. With all the foregoing developments on the principle of good faith in English law and its continuous growing influence, it is time to revisit whether English law’s open denunciation of a general principle of good faith remains true today. English law is described to be a dynamic legal system which always transforms to meet the needs of the times and to create conditions conducive for growth and development. Given the current global economy, the need to adapt to the European and global dimension of contract law carrying more complex transactions and relationships which renders the old and simple system of English contract law no longer sufficient to determine the parties’ intricate contractual obligations and their manner of performance, is English law now ready to abandon its headstrong position that it does not accept the general duty of good faith and is in fact heading towards this direction in contract law? The objective of this work is to answer this question by comparing the treatment and the level of acceptance of good faith in prominent European civil law systems, common law systems and of course, in English law. It will take into account recent developments in English law and with these, benchmark the current level of acceptance of good faith by English law and determine whether it is going towards a general principle or not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信