狄奥尼修斯的本体论与欲望论

M. Rose
{"title":"狄奥尼修斯的本体论与欲望论","authors":"M. Rose","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvdtpk9q.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on a discussion of the work of Dionysius the Areopagite, a key figure in the formation of the Christian mystical tradition. The chapter explores Dionysius’s work, its distinctive characteristics—which arise principally from Dionysius’s idiosyncratic coupling of Christian theology and Neoplatonism—and the mixed legacy he bequeaths to his theological offspring. The chapter sketches the key contours of the Dionysian problematic to which subsequent discussions in the book will return, focusing in particular on his conjunction of eros and ontology and the consequences of this marriage for his account of freedom, materiality, hierarchy, and universality. This Dionysian legacy contains crucial antagonisms with which his intellectual descendants must grapple: the structural homology of creation and fall, the dual desire to escape and to affirm the material world, the problematic association of the hierarchies of ecclesial authority and being itself, and an account that simultaneously denies and embodies the transformation of Christianity by the encounter with that which is foreign to it. As a result, it is not straightforwardly—if at all—possible to be simply faithful to Dionysius’s work, which is itself internally inconsistent.","PeriodicalId":199579,"journal":{"name":"A Theology of Failure","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ontology and Desire in Dionysius the Areopagite\",\"authors\":\"M. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvdtpk9q.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter focuses on a discussion of the work of Dionysius the Areopagite, a key figure in the formation of the Christian mystical tradition. The chapter explores Dionysius’s work, its distinctive characteristics—which arise principally from Dionysius’s idiosyncratic coupling of Christian theology and Neoplatonism—and the mixed legacy he bequeaths to his theological offspring. The chapter sketches the key contours of the Dionysian problematic to which subsequent discussions in the book will return, focusing in particular on his conjunction of eros and ontology and the consequences of this marriage for his account of freedom, materiality, hierarchy, and universality. This Dionysian legacy contains crucial antagonisms with which his intellectual descendants must grapple: the structural homology of creation and fall, the dual desire to escape and to affirm the material world, the problematic association of the hierarchies of ecclesial authority and being itself, and an account that simultaneously denies and embodies the transformation of Christianity by the encounter with that which is foreign to it. As a result, it is not straightforwardly—if at all—possible to be simply faithful to Dionysius’s work, which is itself internally inconsistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Theology of Failure\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Theology of Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdtpk9q.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Theology of Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdtpk9q.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章主要讨论狄奥尼修斯的著作,狄奥尼修斯是基督教神秘主义传统形成的关键人物。这一章探讨了狄奥尼修斯的作品,其独特的特点-主要来自狄奥尼修斯对基督教神学和新柏拉图主义的独特结合-以及他留给他的神学后代的混合遗产。这一章勾勒出酒神问题的关键轮廓,书中随后的讨论将会回到这个问题上,特别关注他对爱欲和本体论的结合,以及他对自由、物质性、等级和普遍性的描述所带来的这种婚姻的后果。酒神的遗产包含了他的知识分子后代必须解决的关键对抗:创造和堕落的结构同一性,逃避和肯定物质世界的双重愿望,教会权威的等级制度和存在本身的有问题的联系,同时否认和体现了基督教通过与异己相遇而发生的转变。因此,要简单地忠实于狄奥尼修斯的著作是不可能的,因为狄奥尼修斯的著作本身就自相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ontology and Desire in Dionysius the Areopagite
This chapter focuses on a discussion of the work of Dionysius the Areopagite, a key figure in the formation of the Christian mystical tradition. The chapter explores Dionysius’s work, its distinctive characteristics—which arise principally from Dionysius’s idiosyncratic coupling of Christian theology and Neoplatonism—and the mixed legacy he bequeaths to his theological offspring. The chapter sketches the key contours of the Dionysian problematic to which subsequent discussions in the book will return, focusing in particular on his conjunction of eros and ontology and the consequences of this marriage for his account of freedom, materiality, hierarchy, and universality. This Dionysian legacy contains crucial antagonisms with which his intellectual descendants must grapple: the structural homology of creation and fall, the dual desire to escape and to affirm the material world, the problematic association of the hierarchies of ecclesial authority and being itself, and an account that simultaneously denies and embodies the transformation of Christianity by the encounter with that which is foreign to it. As a result, it is not straightforwardly—if at all—possible to be simply faithful to Dionysius’s work, which is itself internally inconsistent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信