{"title":"基于类颜色的降维技术评估的完整性检查","authors":"Michaël Aupetit","doi":"10.1145/2669557.2669578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dimension Reduction techniques used to visualize multidimensional data provide a scatterplot spatialization of data similarities. A widespread way to evaluate the quality of such DR techniques is to use labeled data as a ground truth and to call the reader as a witness to qualify the visualization by looking at class-cluster correlations within the scatterplot. We expose the pitfalls of this evaluation process and we propose a principled solution to guide researchers to improve the way they use this visual evaluation of DR techniques.","PeriodicalId":179584,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanity check for class-coloring-based evaluation of dimension reduction techniques\",\"authors\":\"Michaël Aupetit\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2669557.2669578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dimension Reduction techniques used to visualize multidimensional data provide a scatterplot spatialization of data similarities. A widespread way to evaluate the quality of such DR techniques is to use labeled data as a ground truth and to call the reader as a witness to qualify the visualization by looking at class-cluster correlations within the scatterplot. We expose the pitfalls of this evaluation process and we propose a principled solution to guide researchers to improve the way they use this visual evaluation of DR techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sanity check for class-coloring-based evaluation of dimension reduction techniques
Dimension Reduction techniques used to visualize multidimensional data provide a scatterplot spatialization of data similarities. A widespread way to evaluate the quality of such DR techniques is to use labeled data as a ground truth and to call the reader as a witness to qualify the visualization by looking at class-cluster correlations within the scatterplot. We expose the pitfalls of this evaluation process and we propose a principled solution to guide researchers to improve the way they use this visual evaluation of DR techniques.