基于通用漏洞评分系统的分析式攻击建模与安全评估

E. Doynikova, A. Chechulin, Igor Kotenko
{"title":"基于通用漏洞评分系统的分析式攻击建模与安全评估","authors":"E. Doynikova, A. Chechulin, Igor Kotenko","doi":"10.23919/FRUCT.2017.8071292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes an approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment on the base of the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) format, considering different modifications that appeared in the new version of the CVSS specification. The common approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment was suggested by the authors earlier. The paper outlines disadvantages of previous CVSS version that influenced negatively on the results of the attack modeling and security assessment. Differences between new and previous CVSS versions are analyzed. Modifications of the approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment that follow from the CVSS modifications are suggested. Advantages of the modified approach are described. Case study that illustrates enhanced approach is provided.","PeriodicalId":114353,"journal":{"name":"2017 20th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical attack modeling and security assessment based on the common vulnerability scoring system\",\"authors\":\"E. Doynikova, A. Chechulin, Igor Kotenko\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/FRUCT.2017.8071292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyzes an approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment on the base of the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) format, considering different modifications that appeared in the new version of the CVSS specification. The common approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment was suggested by the authors earlier. The paper outlines disadvantages of previous CVSS version that influenced negatively on the results of the attack modeling and security assessment. Differences between new and previous CVSS versions are analyzed. Modifications of the approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment that follow from the CVSS modifications are suggested. Advantages of the modified approach are described. Case study that illustrates enhanced approach is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 20th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 20th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT.2017.8071292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 20th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT.2017.8071292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文分析了一种基于通用漏洞评分系统(Common Vulnerability Scoring System, CVSS)格式的分析攻击建模和安全评估方法,并考虑了新版本CVSS规范中出现的不同修改。分析攻击建模和安全评估的常用方法是作者在前面提出的。本文概述了以前的CVSS版本对攻击建模和安全评估结果产生负面影响的缺点。分析了新的和以前的CVSS版本之间的差异。建议对CVSS修改后的分析攻击建模和安全评估方法进行修改。介绍了改进方法的优点。提供了一个案例研究,说明了增强的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytical attack modeling and security assessment based on the common vulnerability scoring system
The paper analyzes an approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment on the base of the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) format, considering different modifications that appeared in the new version of the CVSS specification. The common approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment was suggested by the authors earlier. The paper outlines disadvantages of previous CVSS version that influenced negatively on the results of the attack modeling and security assessment. Differences between new and previous CVSS versions are analyzed. Modifications of the approach to the analytical attack modeling and security assessment that follow from the CVSS modifications are suggested. Advantages of the modified approach are described. Case study that illustrates enhanced approach is provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信