非工会雇员的第三方代表——工作场所隐私或公平待遇的问题

Michael Aiello
{"title":"非工会雇员的第三方代表——工作场所隐私或公平待遇的问题","authors":"Michael Aiello","doi":"10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nonunion employee has a right to protect his/her privacy interests and employment status during investigatory and disciplinary interviews. In the nonunion workplace, the lack of collective bargaining and employee organi­ zation give rise to serious concerns about employee protection. The nonunion employee is often forced to confront and overcome the significant power imbalance inherent in the employer-employee relationship. This imbalance is more evident and threatening in the nonunion workplace where employers are not challenged by a union shop steward and have no reason to suspect an organized response by disgruntled employees. The nonunion employee must be allowed to employ the assistance of her coworker during exchanges with her employer. While the assistance of the coworker is not a substitute for a union representative or union organization, it would serve to increase equality and diminish the power imbalance. The presence of a coworker, known as the right to third-party representation, is available to union employees, however, nonunion employees are not able to seek the protection of third-party repre­ sentation. The right to third-party representation must be made available to all employees—union and nonunion employees. The National Labor Relations Board has deprived nonunion employees of the opportunity, the right, to engage in concerted activity for mutual aid and protection. This right is afforded all employees under section seven of the National Labor Relations Act. The board and the courts initially held that this right did extend to nonunion, as well as, union employees. In 1988, however, the board reversed its position by ignoring the mandates of section seven and the needs of nonunion employees. The board relied on speculation in distinguishing the needs and necessarily the rights of union and nonunion employees. The policy supporting the right to third-party representation in the union workplace is met, if not overcome, in the nonunion workplace. The right to representation at investigatory interviews is a form of fundamental concerted activity for © 1994, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 113 doi: 10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3 http://baywood.com","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-Party Representation for Nonunion Employees—A Question of Privacy or Just Equal Treatment in the Workplace\",\"authors\":\"Michael Aiello\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The nonunion employee has a right to protect his/her privacy interests and employment status during investigatory and disciplinary interviews. In the nonunion workplace, the lack of collective bargaining and employee organi­ zation give rise to serious concerns about employee protection. The nonunion employee is often forced to confront and overcome the significant power imbalance inherent in the employer-employee relationship. This imbalance is more evident and threatening in the nonunion workplace where employers are not challenged by a union shop steward and have no reason to suspect an organized response by disgruntled employees. The nonunion employee must be allowed to employ the assistance of her coworker during exchanges with her employer. While the assistance of the coworker is not a substitute for a union representative or union organization, it would serve to increase equality and diminish the power imbalance. The presence of a coworker, known as the right to third-party representation, is available to union employees, however, nonunion employees are not able to seek the protection of third-party repre­ sentation. The right to third-party representation must be made available to all employees—union and nonunion employees. The National Labor Relations Board has deprived nonunion employees of the opportunity, the right, to engage in concerted activity for mutual aid and protection. This right is afforded all employees under section seven of the National Labor Relations Act. The board and the courts initially held that this right did extend to nonunion, as well as, union employees. In 1988, however, the board reversed its position by ignoring the mandates of section seven and the needs of nonunion employees. The board relied on speculation in distinguishing the needs and necessarily the rights of union and nonunion employees. The policy supporting the right to third-party representation in the union workplace is met, if not overcome, in the nonunion workplace. The right to representation at investigatory interviews is a form of fundamental concerted activity for © 1994, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 113 doi: 10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3 http://baywood.com\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在调查和纪律面谈期间,非工会雇员有权保护他/她的隐私利益和就业状况。在无工会的工作场所,缺乏集体谈判和员工组织引起了对员工保护的严重关注。非工会雇员经常被迫面对和克服雇主-雇员关系中固有的重大权力不平衡。这种不平衡在非工会的工作场所更为明显和具有威胁性,因为雇主没有受到工会车间管理人员的挑战,也没有理由怀疑心怀不满的员工会有组织的回应。非工会雇员必须被允许在与雇主交流时雇用同事的协助。虽然同事的协助不能代替工会代表或工会组织,但它有助于增加平等,减少权力不平衡。同事在场,被称为第三方代表权,工会员工可以使用,但是,非工会员工不能寻求第三方代表权的保护。第三方代表的权利必须提供给所有员工——工会和非工会员工。国家劳工关系委员会剥夺了非工会雇员为互助和保护而参与协调一致活动的机会和权利。根据《国家劳动关系法》第7条,所有雇员都享有这项权利。董事会和法院最初认为,这项权利确实延伸到非工会和工会雇员。然而,在1988年,董事会改变了立场,无视第七章的规定和非工会雇员的需要。董事会依靠猜测来区分工会和非工会雇员的需求和必要的权利。支持在工会工作场所有第三方代表权利的政策在非工会工作场所得到了满足(如果不是克服的话)。调查访谈中的代表权是©1994,Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 113 doi: 10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3 http://baywood.com的一种基本协调活动形式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third-Party Representation for Nonunion Employees—A Question of Privacy or Just Equal Treatment in the Workplace
The nonunion employee has a right to protect his/her privacy interests and employment status during investigatory and disciplinary interviews. In the nonunion workplace, the lack of collective bargaining and employee organi­ zation give rise to serious concerns about employee protection. The nonunion employee is often forced to confront and overcome the significant power imbalance inherent in the employer-employee relationship. This imbalance is more evident and threatening in the nonunion workplace where employers are not challenged by a union shop steward and have no reason to suspect an organized response by disgruntled employees. The nonunion employee must be allowed to employ the assistance of her coworker during exchanges with her employer. While the assistance of the coworker is not a substitute for a union representative or union organization, it would serve to increase equality and diminish the power imbalance. The presence of a coworker, known as the right to third-party representation, is available to union employees, however, nonunion employees are not able to seek the protection of third-party repre­ sentation. The right to third-party representation must be made available to all employees—union and nonunion employees. The National Labor Relations Board has deprived nonunion employees of the opportunity, the right, to engage in concerted activity for mutual aid and protection. This right is afforded all employees under section seven of the National Labor Relations Act. The board and the courts initially held that this right did extend to nonunion, as well as, union employees. In 1988, however, the board reversed its position by ignoring the mandates of section seven and the needs of nonunion employees. The board relied on speculation in distinguishing the needs and necessarily the rights of union and nonunion employees. The policy supporting the right to third-party representation in the union workplace is met, if not overcome, in the nonunion workplace. The right to representation at investigatory interviews is a form of fundamental concerted activity for © 1994, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 113 doi: 10.2190/B853-5671-UMGK-6YA3 http://baywood.com
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信