通货紧缩会导致经济枯竭吗?关于非单调不动点归纳

E. Grädel, S. Kreutzer
{"title":"通货紧缩会导致经济枯竭吗?关于非单调不动点归纳","authors":"E. Grädel, S. Kreutzer","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2003.1210055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We survey logical formalisms based on inflationary and deflationary fixed points, and compare them to the (more familiar) logics based on least and greatest fixed points.","PeriodicalId":280809,"journal":{"name":"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will deflation lead to depletion? On non-monotone fixed point inductions\",\"authors\":\"E. Grädel, S. Kreutzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.2003.1210055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We survey logical formalisms based on inflationary and deflationary fixed points, and compare them to the (more familiar) logics based on least and greatest fixed points.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2003.1210055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2003.1210055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们考察了基于通货膨胀不动点和通货紧缩不动点的逻辑形式,并将它们与(更熟悉的)基于最小不动点和最大不动点的逻辑进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Will deflation lead to depletion? On non-monotone fixed point inductions
We survey logical formalisms based on inflationary and deflationary fixed points, and compare them to the (more familiar) logics based on least and greatest fixed points.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信