Lukas Beierlieb, Lukas Iffländer, T. Schneider, Thomas Prantl, Samuel Kounev
{"title":"使用自动评分教学软件测试","authors":"Lukas Beierlieb, Lukas Iffländer, T. Schneider, Thomas Prantl, Samuel Kounev","doi":"10.18420/abp2021-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software testing has become a standard for most software projects. However, there is a lack of testing in many curricula, and if present, courses lack instant feedback using automated systems. In this work, we show our realization of an exercise to teach software testing using an automated grading system. We illustrate our didactic goals, describe the task design and technical implementation. Evaluation shows that students experience only a slight increase in difficulty compared to other tasks and perceive the task description as sufficient.","PeriodicalId":170086,"journal":{"name":"Workshop Automatische Bewertung von Programmieraufgaben","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Software Testing Using Automated Grading\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Beierlieb, Lukas Iffländer, T. Schneider, Thomas Prantl, Samuel Kounev\",\"doi\":\"10.18420/abp2021-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software testing has become a standard for most software projects. However, there is a lack of testing in many curricula, and if present, courses lack instant feedback using automated systems. In this work, we show our realization of an exercise to teach software testing using an automated grading system. We illustrate our didactic goals, describe the task design and technical implementation. Evaluation shows that students experience only a slight increase in difficulty compared to other tasks and perceive the task description as sufficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop Automatische Bewertung von Programmieraufgaben\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop Automatische Bewertung von Programmieraufgaben\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18420/abp2021-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop Automatische Bewertung von Programmieraufgaben","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18420/abp2021-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Software testing has become a standard for most software projects. However, there is a lack of testing in many curricula, and if present, courses lack instant feedback using automated systems. In this work, we show our realization of an exercise to teach software testing using an automated grading system. We illustrate our didactic goals, describe the task design and technical implementation. Evaluation shows that students experience only a slight increase in difficulty compared to other tasks and perceive the task description as sufficient.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
