建筑中的独创性与抄袭和相似性:建筑设计的版权问题

G. Wojtkun
{"title":"建筑中的独创性与抄袭和相似性:建筑设计的版权问题","authors":"G. Wojtkun","doi":"10.21005/pif.2022.52.b-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual property protection via copyright in architecture has been a matter of much controversy. This stemmed from the complex nature of the architectural creative process and its often long duration. Here, there were accusations of the means and scope of copyright protection of architectural designs being insufficiently precise, especially with respect to the inalienability of the author–work link and the lack of economic balance between the designer and the client. The subject of the unintentional infringement on another’s intellectual property in architecture in the context of plagiarism itself.","PeriodicalId":414139,"journal":{"name":"Space&FORM","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ORIGINALITY VERSUS PLAGIARISM AND SIMILARITY IN ARCHITECTURE: COPYRIGHT ASPECTS OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN\",\"authors\":\"G. Wojtkun\",\"doi\":\"10.21005/pif.2022.52.b-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intellectual property protection via copyright in architecture has been a matter of much controversy. This stemmed from the complex nature of the architectural creative process and its often long duration. Here, there were accusations of the means and scope of copyright protection of architectural designs being insufficiently precise, especially with respect to the inalienability of the author–work link and the lack of economic balance between the designer and the client. The subject of the unintentional infringement on another’s intellectual property in architecture in the context of plagiarism itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Space&FORM\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Space&FORM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2022.52.b-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space&FORM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2022.52.b-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过建筑版权保护知识产权一直是一个有争议的问题。这源于建筑创作过程的复杂性及其持续时间的长。在这里,有人指责建筑设计的版权保护方式和范围不够精确,特别是在作者与作品之间的不可剥夺性和设计师与客户之间缺乏经济平衡方面。在抄袭本身的背景下,无意侵犯他人建筑知识产权的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ORIGINALITY VERSUS PLAGIARISM AND SIMILARITY IN ARCHITECTURE: COPYRIGHT ASPECTS OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
Intellectual property protection via copyright in architecture has been a matter of much controversy. This stemmed from the complex nature of the architectural creative process and its often long duration. Here, there were accusations of the means and scope of copyright protection of architectural designs being insufficiently precise, especially with respect to the inalienability of the author–work link and the lack of economic balance between the designer and the client. The subject of the unintentional infringement on another’s intellectual property in architecture in the context of plagiarism itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信