Franciszek Chwałczyk
{"title":"Techniczna konstrukcja/odkrywanie prawd (1): odkrycie Talesa i miary średniowieczne","authors":"Franciszek Chwałczyk","doi":"10.14746/h.2019.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing about the relationship between Martin Heidegger’s philosophy and Marxist philosophy, Jean Beaufret states (after Hegel) that it was in Descartes philospohy that the very essence of truth was resolved in a new way. I interpret it as follows: it is not statement mainly about the fact that its content – what is considered to be true – has changed. This has been changing many times, depending on time and place. What has changed is the truth itself; what (and why) is considered true; by what means truth spreads and reproduces. So I am less interested in what the Truth is - in itself, in its essence (especially that it seems to be historically changeable) - or (making distinction) what are those different truths (modern or not; that what is currently true or considered as such). I am going to focus here on this very resolution: how Truth was (re-)constructed, how one discovers/constructs truths and what conditions they must fulfill according to given Truth. It is a two-part text, and this is first part.","PeriodicalId":312956,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/h.2019.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于马丁·海德格尔哲学和马克思主义哲学之间的关系,让·博弗雷特(在黑格尔之后)指出,正是在笛卡尔哲学中,真理的本质以一种新的方式得到了解决。我对它的解释如下:它主要不是关于它的内容——被认为是真实的东西——已经改变这一事实的陈述。这已经改变了很多次,取决于时间和地点。改变的是真相本身;什么(以及为什么)被认为是正确的;真相是如何传播和复制的?因此,我对真理是什么——就其本身而言,就其本质而言(尤其是它似乎在历史上是可变的)——或(加以区分)那些不同的真理是什么(现代的或不是;这是目前真实的或被认为是真实的)。我将在这里集中讨论这个问题:真理是如何被(重新)建构的,一个人如何发现/建构真理,以及根据给定的真理,他们必须满足什么条件。全文分为两部分,这是第一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techniczna konstrukcja/odkrywanie prawd (1): odkrycie Talesa i miary średniowieczne
Writing about the relationship between Martin Heidegger’s philosophy and Marxist philosophy, Jean Beaufret states (after Hegel) that it was in Descartes philospohy that the very essence of truth was resolved in a new way. I interpret it as follows: it is not statement mainly about the fact that its content – what is considered to be true – has changed. This has been changing many times, depending on time and place. What has changed is the truth itself; what (and why) is considered true; by what means truth spreads and reproduces. So I am less interested in what the Truth is - in itself, in its essence (especially that it seems to be historically changeable) - or (making distinction) what are those different truths (modern or not; that what is currently true or considered as such). I am going to focus here on this very resolution: how Truth was (re-)constructed, how one discovers/constructs truths and what conditions they must fulfill according to given Truth. It is a two-part text, and this is first part.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信