自管理P2P流媒体的评估

M. Alhaisoni, A. Liotta, M. Ghanbari
{"title":"自管理P2P流媒体的评估","authors":"M. Alhaisoni, A. Liotta, M. Ghanbari","doi":"10.1109/ICAS.2009.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer-to-Peer (P2P) IPTV applications have increasingly been considered as a potential approach to online broadcasting. These overcome fundamental client-server issues and introduce new, self-management features that help improving performance. Recently, many applications such as PPlive, PPStream, Sopcast, and Joost have been deployed to deliver live and Video-on-Demand streaming via P2P. However, the P2P approach has also shown some points of failure and limitations. In this paper we analyze, assess and compare two popular Live and Video-on-Demand P2P streaming applications, Sopcast and Joost. Our goal is not simply to underline similarities and differences from the architectural and functional point of view, but also to highlight their performance in terms of traffic behavior and network efficiency; thus our experiments have been conducted in different scenarios including a large-scale event (Euro 2008).","PeriodicalId":258907,"journal":{"name":"2009 Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems","volume":"289 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Self-Managed P2P Streaming\",\"authors\":\"M. Alhaisoni, A. Liotta, M. Ghanbari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAS.2009.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peer-to-Peer (P2P) IPTV applications have increasingly been considered as a potential approach to online broadcasting. These overcome fundamental client-server issues and introduce new, self-management features that help improving performance. Recently, many applications such as PPlive, PPStream, Sopcast, and Joost have been deployed to deliver live and Video-on-Demand streaming via P2P. However, the P2P approach has also shown some points of failure and limitations. In this paper we analyze, assess and compare two popular Live and Video-on-Demand P2P streaming applications, Sopcast and Joost. Our goal is not simply to underline similarities and differences from the architectural and functional point of view, but also to highlight their performance in terms of traffic behavior and network efficiency; thus our experiments have been conducted in different scenarios including a large-scale event (Euro 2008).\",\"PeriodicalId\":258907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems\",\"volume\":\"289 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAS.2009.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAS.2009.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

点对点(P2P) IPTV应用越来越被认为是一种潜在的在线广播方式。这些解决了基本的客户机-服务器问题,并引入了有助于提高性能的新的自我管理特性。最近,许多应用程序如PPlive、PPStream、Sopcast和Joost已经被部署到通过P2P提供直播和视频点播流媒体。然而,P2P方法也显示出一些失败点和局限性。在本文中,我们分析,评估和比较两种流行的直播和视频点播P2P流媒体应用,Sopcast和Joost。我们的目标不仅仅是从架构和功能的角度强调它们的异同,还强调它们在交通行为和网络效率方面的表现;因此,我们的实验是在不同的场景下进行的,包括大型事件(2008年欧洲杯)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of Self-Managed P2P Streaming
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) IPTV applications have increasingly been considered as a potential approach to online broadcasting. These overcome fundamental client-server issues and introduce new, self-management features that help improving performance. Recently, many applications such as PPlive, PPStream, Sopcast, and Joost have been deployed to deliver live and Video-on-Demand streaming via P2P. However, the P2P approach has also shown some points of failure and limitations. In this paper we analyze, assess and compare two popular Live and Video-on-Demand P2P streaming applications, Sopcast and Joost. Our goal is not simply to underline similarities and differences from the architectural and functional point of view, but also to highlight their performance in terms of traffic behavior and network efficiency; thus our experiments have been conducted in different scenarios including a large-scale event (Euro 2008).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信