多项选择:特伦斯·海斯的回应诗歌与非裔美国人抒情诗《我们》

Christopher Spaide
{"title":"多项选择:特伦斯·海斯的回应诗歌与非裔美国人抒情诗《我们》","authors":"Christopher Spaide","doi":"10.1093/camqtly/bfz019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay explores the African American lyric ‘we’, past and present, through the bifocal lenses of the contemporary poet Terrance Hayes. Irreverently responding in verse to Robert Hayden, Gwendolyn Brooks, and Amiri Baraka, Hayes mines his subject matter from the African American poet’s choices between ‘I’ and ‘we’, between speaking for oneself and speaking for one’s people. Exercising the ‘multiple choice’ of post-Civil Rights generation poets, Hayes strives for all the above. The essay examines three forms of response to the tradition: confrontational ‘talking back’ in Hip Logic, ‘Blue’ ventriloquism in Wind in the Box, and collaboration with the dead in Lighthead.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.","PeriodicalId":374258,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Quarterly","volume":"9 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Choice: Terrance Hayes’s Response-Poems and the African American Lyric ‘We’\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Spaide\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/camqtly/bfz019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay explores the African American lyric ‘we’, past and present, through the bifocal lenses of the contemporary poet Terrance Hayes. Irreverently responding in verse to Robert Hayden, Gwendolyn Brooks, and Amiri Baraka, Hayes mines his subject matter from the African American poet’s choices between ‘I’ and ‘we’, between speaking for oneself and speaking for one’s people. Exercising the ‘multiple choice’ of post-Civil Rights generation poets, Hayes strives for all the above. The essay examines three forms of response to the tradition: confrontational ‘talking back’ in Hip Logic, ‘Blue’ ventriloquism in Wind in the Box, and collaboration with the dead in Lighthead.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"9 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文通过当代诗人特伦斯·海斯的双焦点镜头,探讨了非裔美国人抒情诗“我们”的过去和现在。海耶斯用诗歌不敬地回应了罗伯特·海登、格温多林·布鲁克斯和阿米里·巴拉卡,从这位非裔美国诗人在“我”和“我们”之间、在为自己说话和为自己的人民说话之间的选择中挖掘出他的主题。运用民权运动后一代诗人的“多重选择”,海斯努力实现上述所有目标。本文考察了对传统的三种回应形式:《嘻哈逻辑》中对抗性的“顶嘴”,《盒子里的风》中的“蓝色”腹语,以及《灯塔》中与死者的合作。这篇文章是《剑桥季刊》第48卷第48期题为“诗歌的我们”的四篇文章之一。3.这四篇文章形成了一个整体,有许多共同的关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple Choice: Terrance Hayes’s Response-Poems and the African American Lyric ‘We’
Abstract:This essay explores the African American lyric ‘we’, past and present, through the bifocal lenses of the contemporary poet Terrance Hayes. Irreverently responding in verse to Robert Hayden, Gwendolyn Brooks, and Amiri Baraka, Hayes mines his subject matter from the African American poet’s choices between ‘I’ and ‘we’, between speaking for oneself and speaking for one’s people. Exercising the ‘multiple choice’ of post-Civil Rights generation poets, Hayes strives for all the above. The essay examines three forms of response to the tradition: confrontational ‘talking back’ in Hip Logic, ‘Blue’ ventriloquism in Wind in the Box, and collaboration with the dead in Lighthead.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信