在民事诉讼中,在审判结束而未作出判决的情况下,退还法庭费用的法律机制

U. Vorobel
{"title":"在民事诉讼中,在审判结束而未作出判决的情况下,退还法庭费用的法律机制","authors":"U. Vorobel","doi":"10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-57-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The peculiarities of the legal mechanism of returning the court fee in case of completion of civil cases without a court decision are analyzed, issues of these applications practical resolving are considered, as well as suggestions for improving the legal regulation in case of the closure of the proceedings or leaving the application without consideration are proposed. While analyzing examples of case law, it was established that the lack of legislative regulation of the procedure for confirming or denying the existence of grounds for the amount of court fees refund causes a lot of confusion and contradictory solutions to the judiciary in this regard. The position on the impossibility of equalization due to the different procedural nature of leaving without consideration of statements on procedural issues, such as: on providing evidence, on securing a claim, on dismissal of a judge, and leaving without considering a statement of claim as a civil procedural institute, regulated by Art. 257 of CPC of Ukraine are justified. It has been concluded that in case the court finds circumstances that are grounds for the application of the institute of leaving the application without consideration and provided for in Art. 257 of CPS of Ukraine, when considering applications on procedural issues, should apply such a special legal consequence as a return of the application without consideration. It has been established that returning an application on procedural issues without consideration and leaving an application without consideration are completely different legal categories. Return of applications on procedural issues without consideration due to its legal nature is a special basis for the application of the return of the application institute, and therefore the legal consequence of such an application would be considered not filed at all. In this connection, it has been proposed to enshrine in the legislation the provisions on the refund of the court fee in case of return without consideration of the application on procedural issues, for the submission of which such payment was paid.","PeriodicalId":331578,"journal":{"name":"Social & Legal Studios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEGAL MECHANISM OF THE COURT FEE REFUND IN CASE OF TRIAL COMPLETION WITHOUT ADOPTION OF A JUDGEMENT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS\",\"authors\":\"U. Vorobel\",\"doi\":\"10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-57-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The peculiarities of the legal mechanism of returning the court fee in case of completion of civil cases without a court decision are analyzed, issues of these applications practical resolving are considered, as well as suggestions for improving the legal regulation in case of the closure of the proceedings or leaving the application without consideration are proposed. While analyzing examples of case law, it was established that the lack of legislative regulation of the procedure for confirming or denying the existence of grounds for the amount of court fees refund causes a lot of confusion and contradictory solutions to the judiciary in this regard. The position on the impossibility of equalization due to the different procedural nature of leaving without consideration of statements on procedural issues, such as: on providing evidence, on securing a claim, on dismissal of a judge, and leaving without considering a statement of claim as a civil procedural institute, regulated by Art. 257 of CPC of Ukraine are justified. It has been concluded that in case the court finds circumstances that are grounds for the application of the institute of leaving the application without consideration and provided for in Art. 257 of CPS of Ukraine, when considering applications on procedural issues, should apply such a special legal consequence as a return of the application without consideration. It has been established that returning an application on procedural issues without consideration and leaving an application without consideration are completely different legal categories. Return of applications on procedural issues without consideration due to its legal nature is a special basis for the application of the return of the application institute, and therefore the legal consequence of such an application would be considered not filed at all. In this connection, it has been proposed to enshrine in the legislation the provisions on the refund of the court fee in case of return without consideration of the application on procedural issues, for the submission of which such payment was paid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social & Legal Studios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social & Legal Studios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-57-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-57-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析了民事结案不经判决退还诉讼费法律机制的特殊性,探讨了这类申请在实际解决中存在的问题,并提出了完善民事结案不经审理或不经审理的法律规制的建议。通过对判例法实例的分析发现,由于缺乏对确认或否认法院费用退还数额理由存在的程序的立法规定,导致司法部门在这方面产生了许多混乱和矛盾的解决办法。由于不考虑关于程序问题的陈述而离开的不同程序性质,例如:关于提供证据,关于获得索赔,关于解雇法官,以及不考虑作为民事诉讼机构的索赔陈述而离开,乌克兰CPC第257条规定的不可能实现平等的立场是合理的。已得出的结论是,如果法院发现存在乌克兰《刑事诉讼法》第257条所规定的、作为不经审议而不予受理申请的理由的情况,则在审议关于程序问题的申请时,应适用一种特殊的法律后果,即不经审议而退回申请。已经确定的是,不经审议就程序问题退回申请和不经审议就放弃申请是完全不同的法律类别。由于其法律性质而不考虑就程序问题退回申请是申请机构退回申请的特殊依据,因此这种申请的法律后果将被视为根本不提交。在这方面,有人建议在立法中列入关于在返回的情况下退还法院费用而不考虑关于程序问题的申请的规定,因为提交的申请已支付了这笔费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LEGAL MECHANISM OF THE COURT FEE REFUND IN CASE OF TRIAL COMPLETION WITHOUT ADOPTION OF A JUDGEMENT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
The peculiarities of the legal mechanism of returning the court fee in case of completion of civil cases without a court decision are analyzed, issues of these applications practical resolving are considered, as well as suggestions for improving the legal regulation in case of the closure of the proceedings or leaving the application without consideration are proposed. While analyzing examples of case law, it was established that the lack of legislative regulation of the procedure for confirming or denying the existence of grounds for the amount of court fees refund causes a lot of confusion and contradictory solutions to the judiciary in this regard. The position on the impossibility of equalization due to the different procedural nature of leaving without consideration of statements on procedural issues, such as: on providing evidence, on securing a claim, on dismissal of a judge, and leaving without considering a statement of claim as a civil procedural institute, regulated by Art. 257 of CPC of Ukraine are justified. It has been concluded that in case the court finds circumstances that are grounds for the application of the institute of leaving the application without consideration and provided for in Art. 257 of CPS of Ukraine, when considering applications on procedural issues, should apply such a special legal consequence as a return of the application without consideration. It has been established that returning an application on procedural issues without consideration and leaving an application without consideration are completely different legal categories. Return of applications on procedural issues without consideration due to its legal nature is a special basis for the application of the return of the application institute, and therefore the legal consequence of such an application would be considered not filed at all. In this connection, it has been proposed to enshrine in the legislation the provisions on the refund of the court fee in case of return without consideration of the application on procedural issues, for the submission of which such payment was paid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信