基于翻译模型和降维方法的文献扩展研究

Saeid Balaneshinkordan, Alexander Kotov
{"title":"基于翻译模型和降维方法的文献扩展研究","authors":"Saeid Balaneshinkordan, Alexander Kotov","doi":"10.1145/2970398.2970439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over a decade of research on document expansion methods resulted in several independent avenues, including smoothing methods, translation models, and dimensionality reduction techniques, such as matrix decompositions and topic models. Although these research avenues have been individually explored in many previous studies, there is still a lack of understanding of how state-of-the-art methods for each of these directions compare with each other in terms of retrieval accuracy. This paper eliminates this gap by reporting the results of an empirical comparison of document expansion methods using translation models estimated based on word co-occurrence and cosine similarity between low-dimensional word embeddings, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), on standard TREC collections. Experimental results indicate that LDA-based document expansion consistently outperforms both types of translation models and NMF according to all evaluation metrics for all and difficult queries, which is closely followed by translation model using word embeddings.","PeriodicalId":443715,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Document Expansion using Translation Models and Dimensionality Reduction Methods\",\"authors\":\"Saeid Balaneshinkordan, Alexander Kotov\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2970398.2970439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over a decade of research on document expansion methods resulted in several independent avenues, including smoothing methods, translation models, and dimensionality reduction techniques, such as matrix decompositions and topic models. Although these research avenues have been individually explored in many previous studies, there is still a lack of understanding of how state-of-the-art methods for each of these directions compare with each other in terms of retrieval accuracy. This paper eliminates this gap by reporting the results of an empirical comparison of document expansion methods using translation models estimated based on word co-occurrence and cosine similarity between low-dimensional word embeddings, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), on standard TREC collections. Experimental results indicate that LDA-based document expansion consistently outperforms both types of translation models and NMF according to all evaluation metrics for all and difficult queries, which is closely followed by translation model using word embeddings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970398.2970439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970398.2970439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

十多年来对文档扩展方法的研究产生了几种独立的方法,包括平滑方法、翻译模型和降维技术,如矩阵分解和主题模型。尽管这些研究途径已经在许多先前的研究中单独探索过,但仍然缺乏对这些方向的最先进方法在检索精度方面的相互比较的理解。本文通过报告在标准TREC集合上使用基于低维词嵌入、潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)和非负矩阵分解(NMF)之间的词共现和余弦相似性估计的翻译模型的文档扩展方法的经验比较结果来消除这一差距。实验结果表明,基于lda的文档扩展在所有和困难查询的所有评估指标上都优于两种翻译模型和NMF,紧随其后的是使用词嵌入的翻译模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Document Expansion using Translation Models and Dimensionality Reduction Methods
Over a decade of research on document expansion methods resulted in several independent avenues, including smoothing methods, translation models, and dimensionality reduction techniques, such as matrix decompositions and topic models. Although these research avenues have been individually explored in many previous studies, there is still a lack of understanding of how state-of-the-art methods for each of these directions compare with each other in terms of retrieval accuracy. This paper eliminates this gap by reporting the results of an empirical comparison of document expansion methods using translation models estimated based on word co-occurrence and cosine similarity between low-dimensional word embeddings, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), on standard TREC collections. Experimental results indicate that LDA-based document expansion consistently outperforms both types of translation models and NMF according to all evaluation metrics for all and difficult queries, which is closely followed by translation model using word embeddings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信