{"title":"第一浪漫主义关键时期的斯宾诺莎主义和反讽","authors":"Vicente Serrano","doi":"10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the question of irony in the irruption of early Romanticism, in particular in the work of Friedrich Schegel. It interprets the notion of irony from a poetic and not a strictly philosophical approach, according to the reception model of Spinoza’s work, which, philosophically interpreted by post-Kantian systems, gives results quite different from the aesthetic position from which it is received by the Romantics.","PeriodicalId":282621,"journal":{"name":"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPINOZISMO E IRONÍA EN LOS AÑOS CRUCIALES DEL PRIMER ROMANTICISMO\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the question of irony in the irruption of early Romanticism, in particular in the work of Friedrich Schegel. It interprets the notion of irony from a poetic and not a strictly philosophical approach, according to the reception model of Spinoza’s work, which, philosophically interpreted by post-Kantian systems, gives results quite different from the aesthetic position from which it is received by the Romantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
SPINOZISMO E IRONÍA EN LOS AÑOS CRUCIALES DEL PRIMER ROMANTICISMO
This article analyzes the question of irony in the irruption of early Romanticism, in particular in the work of Friedrich Schegel. It interprets the notion of irony from a poetic and not a strictly philosophical approach, according to the reception model of Spinoza’s work, which, philosophically interpreted by post-Kantian systems, gives results quite different from the aesthetic position from which it is received by the Romantics.