第一浪漫主义关键时期的斯宾诺莎主义和反讽

Vicente Serrano
{"title":"第一浪漫主义关键时期的斯宾诺莎主义和反讽","authors":"Vicente Serrano","doi":"10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the question of irony in the irruption of early Romanticism, in particular in the work of Friedrich Schegel. It interprets the notion of irony from a poetic and not a strictly philosophical approach, according to the reception model of Spinoza’s work, which, philosophically interpreted by post-Kantian systems, gives results quite different from the aesthetic position from which it is received by the Romantics.","PeriodicalId":282621,"journal":{"name":"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPINOZISMO E IRONÍA EN LOS AÑOS CRUCIALES DEL PRIMER ROMANTICISMO\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the question of irony in the irruption of early Romanticism, in particular in the work of Friedrich Schegel. It interprets the notion of irony from a poetic and not a strictly philosophical approach, according to the reception model of Spinoza’s work, which, philosophically interpreted by post-Kantian systems, gives results quite different from the aesthetic position from which it is received by the Romantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445x.607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了早期浪漫主义,特别是弗里德里希·谢格尔作品中的反讽问题。它根据斯宾诺莎作品的接受模式,从诗意而不是严格的哲学角度来解释反讽的概念,后康德体系对其进行哲学解释,得出的结果与浪漫主义者所接受的美学立场截然不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SPINOZISMO E IRONÍA EN LOS AÑOS CRUCIALES DEL PRIMER ROMANTICISMO
This article analyzes the question of irony in the irruption of early Romanticism, in particular in the work of Friedrich Schegel. It interprets the notion of irony from a poetic and not a strictly philosophical approach, according to the reception model of Spinoza’s work, which, philosophically interpreted by post-Kantian systems, gives results quite different from the aesthetic position from which it is received by the Romantics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信