塞尔维亚共和国小额价值纠纷的经济分析

Čedomir Gligorić, Jana Rodic, M. Pavlović, V. Grdinić
{"title":"塞尔维亚共和国小额价值纠纷的经济分析","authors":"Čedomir Gligorić, Jana Rodic, M. Pavlović, V. Grdinić","doi":"10.37708/el.swu.v5i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small value disputes in the Republic of Serbia represent a great burden on the efficient working of the civil courts. Based on the setting of different expectations model, the economic analysis of small value claims shows tendency to initiate frivolous litigation, large disproportion between litigation costs and the value of a small claim, uneconomical litigation, excessive incentives for litigation and too established high threshold value. The paper analyses the economic effects of the planned changes in civil procedural rules of small value disputes. Based on the proposed changes, it is expected: the reduction of litigation costs, especially the attorney's fees the more economical litigation procedure and that lowering the threshold value of small dispute, will be more harmonized with the average monthly salary and GDP. Based on the set model of settlement, it's expected that the lowering the threshold value of a small dispute should lead to a higher settlement rate, as well as that any increase in court fees and reduction of the opposing party’s optimism can lead to higher probability of settlement. The paper presents concrete proposals for improving the efficiency of resolving small value disputes.","PeriodicalId":438310,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Law","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SMALL VALUE DISPUTES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA\",\"authors\":\"Čedomir Gligorić, Jana Rodic, M. Pavlović, V. Grdinić\",\"doi\":\"10.37708/el.swu.v5i1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small value disputes in the Republic of Serbia represent a great burden on the efficient working of the civil courts. Based on the setting of different expectations model, the economic analysis of small value claims shows tendency to initiate frivolous litigation, large disproportion between litigation costs and the value of a small claim, uneconomical litigation, excessive incentives for litigation and too established high threshold value. The paper analyses the economic effects of the planned changes in civil procedural rules of small value disputes. Based on the proposed changes, it is expected: the reduction of litigation costs, especially the attorney's fees the more economical litigation procedure and that lowering the threshold value of small dispute, will be more harmonized with the average monthly salary and GDP. Based on the set model of settlement, it's expected that the lowering the threshold value of a small dispute should lead to a higher settlement rate, as well as that any increase in court fees and reduction of the opposing party’s optimism can lead to higher probability of settlement. The paper presents concrete proposals for improving the efficiency of resolving small value disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Law\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37708/el.swu.v5i1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/el.swu.v5i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塞尔维亚共和国的小额纠纷对民事法院的有效工作是一个很大的负担。基于不同期望模型的设置,小额索赔的经济学分析表明,小额索赔容易引发无谓诉讼、诉讼成本与小额索赔价值不成比例、诉讼不经济、诉讼激励过度、诉讼门槛过高。本文分析了拟修改小额纠纷民事诉讼规则的经济效应。根据提议的变化,预计诉讼费用特别是律师费的降低,更经济的诉讼程序,小纠纷的门槛的降低,将与平均月薪和国内生产总值更加协调。根据既定的和解模型,可以预期,小纠纷的门槛值降低会导致更高的和解率,而法庭费用的增加和对方乐观情绪的降低会导致更高的和解概率。本文提出了提高小额纠纷解决效率的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SMALL VALUE DISPUTES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Small value disputes in the Republic of Serbia represent a great burden on the efficient working of the civil courts. Based on the setting of different expectations model, the economic analysis of small value claims shows tendency to initiate frivolous litigation, large disproportion between litigation costs and the value of a small claim, uneconomical litigation, excessive incentives for litigation and too established high threshold value. The paper analyses the economic effects of the planned changes in civil procedural rules of small value disputes. Based on the proposed changes, it is expected: the reduction of litigation costs, especially the attorney's fees the more economical litigation procedure and that lowering the threshold value of small dispute, will be more harmonized with the average monthly salary and GDP. Based on the set model of settlement, it's expected that the lowering the threshold value of a small dispute should lead to a higher settlement rate, as well as that any increase in court fees and reduction of the opposing party’s optimism can lead to higher probability of settlement. The paper presents concrete proposals for improving the efficiency of resolving small value disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信