追踪纽约州教师短缺:2013年和2017年学校和教师调查报告

A. Stanley, Rhonda E. Maneval, Linda Millenbach, M. Nettleton, D. Elliott, Gertrude B. Hutchinson, M. Stapleton, Yvonne Johnston
{"title":"追踪纽约州教师短缺:2013年和2017年学校和教师调查报告","authors":"A. Stanley, Rhonda E. Maneval, Linda Millenbach, M. Nettleton, D. Elliott, Gertrude B. Hutchinson, M. Stapleton, Yvonne Johnston","doi":"10.47988/janany.23587684.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This secondary analysis of existing data compared the results of the 2013 New York State (NYS) Nursing Schools and Faculty Report Survey to the results of a replication study completed in 2017. The NYS Council of Deans representing baccalaureate and higher degree programs in NYS and the Council of Associate Degree Nursing were surveyed in academic years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017 (referenced as 2013 and 2017, respectively). Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide detailed and aggregate baseline data about NYS nursing schools' capacity in relation to the number, characteristics, distribution, vacancy rates, and retirement plans of faculty and to contextualize these findings in current national trends. While the issue of nursing faculty shortage is not new in NYS, two studies were conducted in academic years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017, respectively, that examined the rate of nursing faculty vacancies and factors contributing to the nursing faculty shortage. In addition, the secondary analysis revealed trends that have implications for the current and future state of New York States' ability to prepare an adequate nursing workforce. Methodology: Data analysis included 22 questions that appeared on both surveys. The survey response rate was 71.4% in 2013 and 43% in 2017. SPSS was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics summarize the data and identify patterns and trends between the two data collection points. Results: Faculty gender composition remained unchanged from 2013 to 2017, with 92% women and 8% men. Race and ethnicity of faculty also remained stable in 2013 and 2017, with 78% and 79% of faculty reported as White, respectively. There was little change in the percentage of minority faculty. Most faculty were between the ages of 50 and 59 years (35% in 2013 and 31% in 2017). The master's degree was the highest level of degree for most nursing faculty at 64% in 2013 and 63% in 2017. The top strategy used by nursing schools to fill vacancies was to hire more adjunct faculty, while the most cited strategy to recruit full-time faculty was to increase salaries. The most cited reason for the separation of faculty in 2013 was that faculty accepted a position elsewhere (31%), and in 2017 the most cited reason was retirement (49%). Limitations: The limitations of this analysis include: (a) decrease in survey response rates between the two survey periods, since response rates are a potential source of bias, and (b) the wording of questions was not identical in some cases, which could have led to different responses based on how the question was worded. Conclusions and Recommendations: Complex factors contribute to the NYS faculty shortage and include an aging faculty, increasing retirements, lack of diversity, and low compensation. These results mirror the results of national surveys on the faculty shortage, indicating that NYS needs to take action now to address the nursing pipeline issue.","PeriodicalId":192372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking the New York State Faculty Shortage: Report on the Schools and Faculty Survey 2013 and 2017\",\"authors\":\"A. Stanley, Rhonda E. Maneval, Linda Millenbach, M. Nettleton, D. Elliott, Gertrude B. Hutchinson, M. Stapleton, Yvonne Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.47988/janany.23587684.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This secondary analysis of existing data compared the results of the 2013 New York State (NYS) Nursing Schools and Faculty Report Survey to the results of a replication study completed in 2017. The NYS Council of Deans representing baccalaureate and higher degree programs in NYS and the Council of Associate Degree Nursing were surveyed in academic years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017 (referenced as 2013 and 2017, respectively). Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide detailed and aggregate baseline data about NYS nursing schools' capacity in relation to the number, characteristics, distribution, vacancy rates, and retirement plans of faculty and to contextualize these findings in current national trends. While the issue of nursing faculty shortage is not new in NYS, two studies were conducted in academic years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017, respectively, that examined the rate of nursing faculty vacancies and factors contributing to the nursing faculty shortage. In addition, the secondary analysis revealed trends that have implications for the current and future state of New York States' ability to prepare an adequate nursing workforce. Methodology: Data analysis included 22 questions that appeared on both surveys. The survey response rate was 71.4% in 2013 and 43% in 2017. SPSS was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics summarize the data and identify patterns and trends between the two data collection points. Results: Faculty gender composition remained unchanged from 2013 to 2017, with 92% women and 8% men. Race and ethnicity of faculty also remained stable in 2013 and 2017, with 78% and 79% of faculty reported as White, respectively. There was little change in the percentage of minority faculty. Most faculty were between the ages of 50 and 59 years (35% in 2013 and 31% in 2017). The master's degree was the highest level of degree for most nursing faculty at 64% in 2013 and 63% in 2017. The top strategy used by nursing schools to fill vacancies was to hire more adjunct faculty, while the most cited strategy to recruit full-time faculty was to increase salaries. The most cited reason for the separation of faculty in 2013 was that faculty accepted a position elsewhere (31%), and in 2017 the most cited reason was retirement (49%). Limitations: The limitations of this analysis include: (a) decrease in survey response rates between the two survey periods, since response rates are a potential source of bias, and (b) the wording of questions was not identical in some cases, which could have led to different responses based on how the question was worded. Conclusions and Recommendations: Complex factors contribute to the NYS faculty shortage and include an aging faculty, increasing retirements, lack of diversity, and low compensation. These results mirror the results of national surveys on the faculty shortage, indicating that NYS needs to take action now to address the nursing pipeline issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47988/janany.23587684.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47988/janany.23587684.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:这项对现有数据的二次分析将2013年纽约州护理学校和教师报告调查的结果与2017年完成的一项重复研究的结果进行了比较。在2012-2013学年和2016-2017学年(分别参考2013学年和2017学年),对代表纽约大学学士学位和更高学位课程的纽约大学院长委员会和副学士学位护理委员会进行了调查。目的:本研究的目的是提供详细和汇总的基线数据,了解纽约州护理学校的师资数量、特点、分布、空缺率和退休计划,并将这些发现与当前的国家趋势联系起来。虽然护理师资短缺的问题在纽约并不新鲜,但分别在2012-2013学年和2016-2017学年进行了两项研究,调查了护理师资空缺率和导致护理师资短缺的因素。此外,二级分析揭示了趋势,对纽约州目前和未来的能力,准备一个足够的护理队伍的影响。方法:数据分析包括两个调查中出现的22个问题。2013年的调查回复率为71.4%,2017年为43%。采用SPSS软件进行数据分析。描述性统计总结数据并确定两个数据收集点之间的模式和趋势。结果:从2013年到2017年,教师的性别构成保持不变,女性占92%,男性占8%。2013年和2017年,教师的种族和民族也保持稳定,分别有78%和79%的教师是白人。少数族裔教师的比例几乎没有变化。大多数教师的年龄在50至59岁之间(2013年为35%,2017年为31%)。硕士学位是大多数护理学院的最高学位,2013年为64%,2017年为63%。护理学校填补空缺的首要策略是雇佣更多的兼职教师,而招聘全职教师的最常用策略是提高工资。2013年,教师离职最常见的原因是教师接受了其他职位(31%),2017年最常见的原因是退休(49%)。局限性:该分析的局限性包括:(a)两个调查期间的调查回复率下降,因为回复率是偏见的潜在来源,(b)在某些情况下,问题的措辞不相同,这可能导致基于问题措辞的不同反应。结论和建议:导致纽约大学师资短缺的因素很复杂,包括师资老龄化、退休人数增加、缺乏多样性和低薪酬。这些结果反映了全国教师短缺调查的结果,表明纽约现在需要采取行动解决护理管道问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking the New York State Faculty Shortage: Report on the Schools and Faculty Survey 2013 and 2017
Background: This secondary analysis of existing data compared the results of the 2013 New York State (NYS) Nursing Schools and Faculty Report Survey to the results of a replication study completed in 2017. The NYS Council of Deans representing baccalaureate and higher degree programs in NYS and the Council of Associate Degree Nursing were surveyed in academic years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017 (referenced as 2013 and 2017, respectively). Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide detailed and aggregate baseline data about NYS nursing schools' capacity in relation to the number, characteristics, distribution, vacancy rates, and retirement plans of faculty and to contextualize these findings in current national trends. While the issue of nursing faculty shortage is not new in NYS, two studies were conducted in academic years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017, respectively, that examined the rate of nursing faculty vacancies and factors contributing to the nursing faculty shortage. In addition, the secondary analysis revealed trends that have implications for the current and future state of New York States' ability to prepare an adequate nursing workforce. Methodology: Data analysis included 22 questions that appeared on both surveys. The survey response rate was 71.4% in 2013 and 43% in 2017. SPSS was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics summarize the data and identify patterns and trends between the two data collection points. Results: Faculty gender composition remained unchanged from 2013 to 2017, with 92% women and 8% men. Race and ethnicity of faculty also remained stable in 2013 and 2017, with 78% and 79% of faculty reported as White, respectively. There was little change in the percentage of minority faculty. Most faculty were between the ages of 50 and 59 years (35% in 2013 and 31% in 2017). The master's degree was the highest level of degree for most nursing faculty at 64% in 2013 and 63% in 2017. The top strategy used by nursing schools to fill vacancies was to hire more adjunct faculty, while the most cited strategy to recruit full-time faculty was to increase salaries. The most cited reason for the separation of faculty in 2013 was that faculty accepted a position elsewhere (31%), and in 2017 the most cited reason was retirement (49%). Limitations: The limitations of this analysis include: (a) decrease in survey response rates between the two survey periods, since response rates are a potential source of bias, and (b) the wording of questions was not identical in some cases, which could have led to different responses based on how the question was worded. Conclusions and Recommendations: Complex factors contribute to the NYS faculty shortage and include an aging faculty, increasing retirements, lack of diversity, and low compensation. These results mirror the results of national surveys on the faculty shortage, indicating that NYS needs to take action now to address the nursing pipeline issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信