项目经理胜任力模型中的数字化胜任力领域转型

Dmytro Lukianov, Krystsina Mazhei, V. Gogunskii, O. Kolesnikov
{"title":"项目经理胜任力模型中的数字化胜任力领域转型","authors":"Dmytro Lukianov, Krystsina Mazhei, V. Gogunskii, O. Kolesnikov","doi":"10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competency-based approach to project management in world practice and theory has long been universally recognised. The most famous models in this area are the models of the Project Management Institute (PMI) PMCDF 3.0 and the International Project Management Association (IPMA) ICB 4.0.After a deeper acquaintance with the elements of each of the presented models, there is a desire to combine them completely, which suggests that the «integrated competency model» in this case most likely guaranteed the holder of such competencies the ability to comply with ISO 21500.On the other hand, now they are increasingly talking about the need for the so-called «T-shaped professionals». This approach was used by both PMI and IPMA to differentiate their standards, but in the context of differences in requirements in the logic of «portfolio-program-project». This approach also was present in the logic of the IPMA certification model in terms of the scale of the project (-s) managed by the applicant, which subsequently switched to the logic of programs and project portfolios.The research will contribute to the further development of standards, in relation to: definition of criteria for referring to the «digital» competencies of the project manager; building a model of «digital» competencies of the project manager; determine the approach to assessing the «digital» competencies of the project manager; understand of ways to integrate the model of \"digital\" competencies and the functionality of the project management information system.","PeriodicalId":318915,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformation Digital Competence Area in the Competence Model of Project Managers\",\"authors\":\"Dmytro Lukianov, Krystsina Mazhei, V. Gogunskii, O. Kolesnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The competency-based approach to project management in world practice and theory has long been universally recognised. The most famous models in this area are the models of the Project Management Institute (PMI) PMCDF 3.0 and the International Project Management Association (IPMA) ICB 4.0.After a deeper acquaintance with the elements of each of the presented models, there is a desire to combine them completely, which suggests that the «integrated competency model» in this case most likely guaranteed the holder of such competencies the ability to comply with ISO 21500.On the other hand, now they are increasingly talking about the need for the so-called «T-shaped professionals». This approach was used by both PMI and IPMA to differentiate their standards, but in the context of differences in requirements in the logic of «portfolio-program-project». This approach also was present in the logic of the IPMA certification model in terms of the scale of the project (-s) managed by the applicant, which subsequently switched to the logic of programs and project portfolios.The research will contribute to the further development of standards, in relation to: definition of criteria for referring to the «digital» competencies of the project manager; building a model of «digital» competencies of the project manager; determine the approach to assessing the «digital» competencies of the project manager; understand of ways to integrate the model of \\\"digital\\\" competencies and the functionality of the project management information system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于能力的项目管理方法在世界实践和理论中早已得到普遍认可。该领域最著名的模型是项目管理协会(PMI)的PMCDF 3.0模型和国际项目管理协会(IPMA)的ICB 4.0模型。在深入了解了所提出的每个模型的元素之后,人们希望将它们完全结合起来,这表明,在这种情况下,“集成能力模型”最有可能保证这种能力的持有者遵守ISO 21500的能力。另一方面,现在他们越来越多地谈论对所谓的“t型专业人士”的需求。PMI和IPMA都使用这种方法来区分他们的标准,但在“投资组合-计划-项目”逻辑中的需求差异的背景下。这种方法也出现在IPMA认证模式的逻辑中,即申请人管理的项目规模(-s),随后转向项目和项目组合的逻辑。该研究将有助于进一步制定标准,涉及:定义项目经理“数字”能力的标准;建立项目经理的“数字化”能力模型;确定评估项目经理“数字化”能力的方法;理解整合“数字”能力模型和项目管理信息系统功能的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transformation Digital Competence Area in the Competence Model of Project Managers
The competency-based approach to project management in world practice and theory has long been universally recognised. The most famous models in this area are the models of the Project Management Institute (PMI) PMCDF 3.0 and the International Project Management Association (IPMA) ICB 4.0.After a deeper acquaintance with the elements of each of the presented models, there is a desire to combine them completely, which suggests that the «integrated competency model» in this case most likely guaranteed the holder of such competencies the ability to comply with ISO 21500.On the other hand, now they are increasingly talking about the need for the so-called «T-shaped professionals». This approach was used by both PMI and IPMA to differentiate their standards, but in the context of differences in requirements in the logic of «portfolio-program-project». This approach also was present in the logic of the IPMA certification model in terms of the scale of the project (-s) managed by the applicant, which subsequently switched to the logic of programs and project portfolios.The research will contribute to the further development of standards, in relation to: definition of criteria for referring to the «digital» competencies of the project manager; building a model of «digital» competencies of the project manager; determine the approach to assessing the «digital» competencies of the project manager; understand of ways to integrate the model of "digital" competencies and the functionality of the project management information system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信