莎士比亚、服务学习和四面楚歌的人文学科

Hillary Eklund
{"title":"莎士比亚、服务学习和四面楚歌的人文学科","authors":"Hillary Eklund","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides an evolving model for uniting educational practices often believed to be quite remote: service learning and literary analysis. Although one mode ostensibly attends to utility while the other dwells in academic abstraction, pursuing both in tandem reveals more shared interpretive practices than one might expect. Hillary Eklund argues that “when we free ourselves from the burden of proving the relevance of Shakespeare,” and instead create frameworks that collate classroom and community learning, we “heighten both the intellectual and civic stakes of our teaching.” Key to this model is a process that compares “problem-solving frameworks” as a way to foreground metacognition and self-reflection.","PeriodicalId":186553,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shakespeare, Service Learning, and the Embattled Humanities\",\"authors\":\"Hillary Eklund\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter provides an evolving model for uniting educational practices often believed to be quite remote: service learning and literary analysis. Although one mode ostensibly attends to utility while the other dwells in academic abstraction, pursuing both in tandem reveals more shared interpretive practices than one might expect. Hillary Eklund argues that “when we free ourselves from the burden of proving the relevance of Shakespeare,” and instead create frameworks that collate classroom and community learning, we “heighten both the intellectual and civic stakes of our teaching.” Key to this model is a process that compares “problem-solving frameworks” as a way to foreground metacognition and self-reflection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章提供了一种不断发展的模式,用于统一通常被认为相当遥远的教育实践:服务学习和文学分析。虽然一种模式表面上关注效用,而另一种模式则停留在学术抽象中,但两者的结合揭示了比人们预期的更多的共同解释实践。希拉里·埃克伦德(Hillary Eklund)认为,“当我们把自己从证明莎士比亚的相关性的负担中解放出来”,而是创建框架来整理课堂和社区学习,我们“提高了我们教学的智力和公民利益”。这个模型的关键是将“问题解决框架”作为前景元认知和自我反思的一种方式进行比较的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shakespeare, Service Learning, and the Embattled Humanities
This chapter provides an evolving model for uniting educational practices often believed to be quite remote: service learning and literary analysis. Although one mode ostensibly attends to utility while the other dwells in academic abstraction, pursuing both in tandem reveals more shared interpretive practices than one might expect. Hillary Eklund argues that “when we free ourselves from the burden of proving the relevance of Shakespeare,” and instead create frameworks that collate classroom and community learning, we “heighten both the intellectual and civic stakes of our teaching.” Key to this model is a process that compares “problem-solving frameworks” as a way to foreground metacognition and self-reflection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信