希尔顿-伊特战争

R. Bruner, S. Vakharia, S. Carr
{"title":"希尔顿-伊特战争","authors":"R. Bruner, S. Vakharia, S. Carr","doi":"10.1108/CASE.DARDEN.2016.000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case provides a vehicle for discussing analytical approaches to understanding bidding strategies in a hostile tender offer setting. In 1997, Hilton Hotels Corporation offered to acquire ITT Corporation in an unsolicited tender offer. ITT resisted in several ways. At the date of the case (July 17, 1997), ITT announces a restructuring of the firm aimed at delivering about $70 a share to its shareholders. The task for the student is to understand why Hilton's takeover attempt has failed thus far, and what the possible responses might be at this stage. The case contains a completed valuation analysis of ITT (prepared by the casewriter), which suggests that ITT is worth, at most, $89 a share to Hilton. In preparing a possibly higher bid for the firm, the student must weigh the probability of another bidder's entering the fray and that competitor's bid price. The instructor can use this setting to compare the target shareholders' outlook with the classic \"prisoner's dilemma\" and to discuss the expected value of not tendering--both concepts are important in devising a bidding response.","PeriodicalId":373500,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hilton-Itt Wars\",\"authors\":\"R. Bruner, S. Vakharia, S. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/CASE.DARDEN.2016.000306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case provides a vehicle for discussing analytical approaches to understanding bidding strategies in a hostile tender offer setting. In 1997, Hilton Hotels Corporation offered to acquire ITT Corporation in an unsolicited tender offer. ITT resisted in several ways. At the date of the case (July 17, 1997), ITT announces a restructuring of the firm aimed at delivering about $70 a share to its shareholders. The task for the student is to understand why Hilton's takeover attempt has failed thus far, and what the possible responses might be at this stage. The case contains a completed valuation analysis of ITT (prepared by the casewriter), which suggests that ITT is worth, at most, $89 a share to Hilton. In preparing a possibly higher bid for the firm, the student must weigh the probability of another bidder's entering the fray and that competitor's bid price. The instructor can use this setting to compare the target shareholders' outlook with the classic \\\"prisoner's dilemma\\\" and to discuss the expected value of not tendering--both concepts are important in devising a bidding response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/CASE.DARDEN.2016.000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CASE.DARDEN.2016.000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例提供了一个工具,讨论分析方法,以了解在恶意收购要约设置投标策略。1997年,希尔顿酒店集团主动提出收购ITT公司。ITT在几个方面进行了抵制。在案件发生之日(1997年7月17日),ITT宣布公司重组,目标是向股东提供每股70美元的收益。学生的任务是理解为什么希尔顿的收购尝试到目前为止失败了,以及在这个阶段可能的反应是什么。该案例包含了一份完整的ITT估值分析(由案例编写者准备),该分析表明,对希尔顿来说,ITT每股最多值89美元。在为公司准备一个可能更高的出价时,学生必须权衡其他竞标者进入竞争的可能性和竞争对手的出价。讲师可以使用这种设置来比较目标股东的前景与经典的“囚徒困境”,并讨论不投标的预期价值——这两个概念在设计投标响应时都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Hilton-Itt Wars
This case provides a vehicle for discussing analytical approaches to understanding bidding strategies in a hostile tender offer setting. In 1997, Hilton Hotels Corporation offered to acquire ITT Corporation in an unsolicited tender offer. ITT resisted in several ways. At the date of the case (July 17, 1997), ITT announces a restructuring of the firm aimed at delivering about $70 a share to its shareholders. The task for the student is to understand why Hilton's takeover attempt has failed thus far, and what the possible responses might be at this stage. The case contains a completed valuation analysis of ITT (prepared by the casewriter), which suggests that ITT is worth, at most, $89 a share to Hilton. In preparing a possibly higher bid for the firm, the student must weigh the probability of another bidder's entering the fray and that competitor's bid price. The instructor can use this setting to compare the target shareholders' outlook with the classic "prisoner's dilemma" and to discuss the expected value of not tendering--both concepts are important in devising a bidding response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信