对H2O和SINGA两个深度学习平台的独立研究

S. S. Y. Ng, W. Zhu, W. W. S. Tang, L. C. H. Wan, A. Y. W. Wat
{"title":"对H2O和SINGA两个深度学习平台的独立研究","authors":"S. S. Y. Ng, W. Zhu, W. W. S. Tang, L. C. H. Wan, A. Y. W. Wat","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two open source distributed machine learning/deep learning platforms, namely H2O and Apache SINGA, compared their deep learning performances using multilayer perceptron on the classic MNIST database for hand written digits recognition. However, the results reported by both parties differ and neither of them can repeat the results reported by the other side. This paper is an independent study of the performances of H2O and SINGA on deep learning, considering both testing accuracies and time required for model training. We reproduced the performance benchmark, then we designed our experiments to test the performances using a 1-node and a 4-node cluster. We repeated the test for multiple runs and checked the difference in accuracy with a paired t-test. Our study showed that H2O generated stable and accurate performance. SINGA could be trained more efficiently in a short time but the accuracy deviates a lot from the expected if training details were changed.","PeriodicalId":114906,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An independent study of two deep learning platforms - H2O and SINGA\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Y. Ng, W. Zhu, W. W. S. Tang, L. C. H. Wan, A. Y. W. Wat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two open source distributed machine learning/deep learning platforms, namely H2O and Apache SINGA, compared their deep learning performances using multilayer perceptron on the classic MNIST database for hand written digits recognition. However, the results reported by both parties differ and neither of them can repeat the results reported by the other side. This paper is an independent study of the performances of H2O and SINGA on deep learning, considering both testing accuracies and time required for model training. We reproduced the performance benchmark, then we designed our experiments to test the performances using a 1-node and a 4-node cluster. We repeated the test for multiple runs and checked the difference in accuracy with a paired t-test. Our study showed that H2O generated stable and accurate performance. SINGA could be trained more efficiently in a short time but the accuracy deviates a lot from the expected if training details were changed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

两个开源的分布式机器学习/深度学习平台H2O和Apache SINGA,在经典的MNIST数据库上使用多层感知器进行手写体数字识别,比较了它们的深度学习性能。但是,双方报告的结果不同,任何一方都不能重复对方报告的结果。本文是独立研究H2O和SINGA在深度学习上的性能,同时考虑了测试精度和模型训练所需的时间。我们重现了性能基准,然后设计了我们的实验,使用1节点和4节点集群测试性能。我们对多次运行重复测试,并使用配对t检验检查准确性的差异。我们的研究表明H2O产生了稳定准确的性能。SINGA可以在短时间内进行更有效的训练,但如果改变训练细节,准确度会与预期偏差很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An independent study of two deep learning platforms - H2O and SINGA
Two open source distributed machine learning/deep learning platforms, namely H2O and Apache SINGA, compared their deep learning performances using multilayer perceptron on the classic MNIST database for hand written digits recognition. However, the results reported by both parties differ and neither of them can repeat the results reported by the other side. This paper is an independent study of the performances of H2O and SINGA on deep learning, considering both testing accuracies and time required for model training. We reproduced the performance benchmark, then we designed our experiments to test the performances using a 1-node and a 4-node cluster. We repeated the test for multiple runs and checked the difference in accuracy with a paired t-test. Our study showed that H2O generated stable and accurate performance. SINGA could be trained more efficiently in a short time but the accuracy deviates a lot from the expected if training details were changed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信