非母语听者对人工耳蜗模拟语音中韵律标记焦点的解读

Marita K Everhardt, A. Sarampalis, M. Coler, D. Başkent, W. Lowie
{"title":"非母语听者对人工耳蜗模拟语音中韵律标记焦点的解读","authors":"Marita K Everhardt, A. Sarampalis, M. Coler, D. Başkent, W. Lowie","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses how a cochlear implant (CI) simulation influences the interpretation of prosodically marked linguistic focus in a non-native language. In an online experiment, two groups of normal-hearing native Dutch learners of English of different ages (12–14 year-old adolescents vs. 18 + year-old adults) and with different proficiency levels in English (A2 vs. B2/C1) were asked to listen to CI-simulated and non-CI-simulated English sentences differing in prosodically marked focus and indicate which of four possible context questions the speaker answered. Results show that, as expected, focus interpretation is significantly less accurate in the CI-simulated condition compared to the non-CI-simulated condition and that more proficient non-native listeners outperform less proficient non-native listeners. However, there was no interaction between the influence of the spectro-temporal degradation of the CI-simulated speech signal and that of the English proficiency level of the non-native listeners, suggesting that less proficient nonnative listeners are not more strongly affected by the spectro-temporal degradation of an electric speech signal than more proficient non-native listeners.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation of prosodically marked focus in cochlear implant-simulated speech by non-native listeners\",\"authors\":\"Marita K Everhardt, A. Sarampalis, M. Coler, D. Başkent, W. Lowie\",\"doi\":\"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assesses how a cochlear implant (CI) simulation influences the interpretation of prosodically marked linguistic focus in a non-native language. In an online experiment, two groups of normal-hearing native Dutch learners of English of different ages (12–14 year-old adolescents vs. 18 + year-old adults) and with different proficiency levels in English (A2 vs. B2/C1) were asked to listen to CI-simulated and non-CI-simulated English sentences differing in prosodically marked focus and indicate which of four possible context questions the speaker answered. Results show that, as expected, focus interpretation is significantly less accurate in the CI-simulated condition compared to the non-CI-simulated condition and that more proficient non-native listeners outperform less proficient non-native listeners. However, there was no interaction between the influence of the spectro-temporal degradation of the CI-simulated speech signal and that of the English proficiency level of the non-native listeners, suggesting that less proficient nonnative listeners are not more strongly affected by the spectro-temporal degradation of an electric speech signal than more proficient non-native listeners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Speech Prosody 2022\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Speech Prosody 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估人工耳蜗(CI)模拟如何影响非母语中韵律标记语言焦点的解释。在一项在线实验中,两组不同年龄(12-14岁的青少年与18岁以上的成年人)和不同英语熟练程度(A2与B2/C1)的听力正常的母语荷兰英语学习者被要求听不同韵律标记焦点的ci模拟和非ci模拟英语句子,并指出说话者回答了四个可能的上下文问题中的哪一个。结果表明,与非ci模拟条件相比,在ci模拟条件下焦点解释的准确性显著降低,并且熟练程度较高的非母语听者表现优于不熟练的非母语听者。然而,ci模拟语音信号的频谱-时间退化与非母语听众的英语水平之间不存在交互作用,这表明不熟练的非母语听众受电语音信号频谱-时间退化的影响并不比熟练的非母语听众更强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpretation of prosodically marked focus in cochlear implant-simulated speech by non-native listeners
This study assesses how a cochlear implant (CI) simulation influences the interpretation of prosodically marked linguistic focus in a non-native language. In an online experiment, two groups of normal-hearing native Dutch learners of English of different ages (12–14 year-old adolescents vs. 18 + year-old adults) and with different proficiency levels in English (A2 vs. B2/C1) were asked to listen to CI-simulated and non-CI-simulated English sentences differing in prosodically marked focus and indicate which of four possible context questions the speaker answered. Results show that, as expected, focus interpretation is significantly less accurate in the CI-simulated condition compared to the non-CI-simulated condition and that more proficient non-native listeners outperform less proficient non-native listeners. However, there was no interaction between the influence of the spectro-temporal degradation of the CI-simulated speech signal and that of the English proficiency level of the non-native listeners, suggesting that less proficient nonnative listeners are not more strongly affected by the spectro-temporal degradation of an electric speech signal than more proficient non-native listeners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信