{"title":"研究论文#6:集体诉讼补救措施:cy - pr<e:1>;“一个不可能的问题的不完美解决方案”","authors":"P. Cashman, A. Simpson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3765085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we revisit the recommendation of the Victorian Law Reform Commission in 2008 that the courts be given an express power to grant cy-pres remedies. We discuss the use of cy-pres remedies in class actions in the United States of America and Canada is reviewed and the existing practice of granting cy-pres distributions in limited circumstances. It is suggested that the courts should have an express statutory power to grant cy-pres remedies.","PeriodicalId":172026,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Paper #6: Class Action Remedies: Cy-près; ‘An Imperfect Solution to an Impossible Problem’\",\"authors\":\"P. Cashman, A. Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3765085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we revisit the recommendation of the Victorian Law Reform Commission in 2008 that the courts be given an express power to grant cy-pres remedies. We discuss the use of cy-pres remedies in class actions in the United States of America and Canada is reviewed and the existing practice of granting cy-pres distributions in limited circumstances. It is suggested that the courts should have an express statutory power to grant cy-pres remedies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research Paper #6: Class Action Remedies: Cy-près; ‘An Imperfect Solution to an Impossible Problem’
In this paper, we revisit the recommendation of the Victorian Law Reform Commission in 2008 that the courts be given an express power to grant cy-pres remedies. We discuss the use of cy-pres remedies in class actions in the United States of America and Canada is reviewed and the existing practice of granting cy-pres distributions in limited circumstances. It is suggested that the courts should have an express statutory power to grant cy-pres remedies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
