利用自组织签名监测和影响大规模自治系统

A. Taleb-Bendiab, P. Miseldine, D. Lamb
{"title":"利用自组织签名监测和影响大规模自治系统","authors":"A. Taleb-Bendiab, P. Miseldine, D. Lamb","doi":"10.1109/EASE.2007.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of large distributed systems makes the monitoring, necessary for self governance and autonomic functions, very problematic. Systems will be ordered hierarchically, consisting of systems of systems. Furthermore a system may be constructed from systems that are fundamentally different in topology from itself. This means that a monitoring strategy that is successful in one part of the system will not necessarily perform well in another system sector. This work considers a phase transition through four system topologies, observed to occur in the evolution of many self organising systems, starting at a regular circular 2D lattice to a scale-free phase. The best monitoring strategy for a scale-free system is considered with a form of acquaintance monitoring proposed. Thus when a system is observed to be acting in a scale-free manner the most suitable monitoring strategy can be deployed. This paper presents two applications that use the results of this work to monitor and influence distinct layers in network topologies","PeriodicalId":239972,"journal":{"name":"Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (EASe'07)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Signatures of Self-Organisation for Monitoring and Influencing Large Scale Autonomic Systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Taleb-Bendiab, P. Miseldine, D. Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EASE.2007.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complexity of large distributed systems makes the monitoring, necessary for self governance and autonomic functions, very problematic. Systems will be ordered hierarchically, consisting of systems of systems. Furthermore a system may be constructed from systems that are fundamentally different in topology from itself. This means that a monitoring strategy that is successful in one part of the system will not necessarily perform well in another system sector. This work considers a phase transition through four system topologies, observed to occur in the evolution of many self organising systems, starting at a regular circular 2D lattice to a scale-free phase. The best monitoring strategy for a scale-free system is considered with a form of acquaintance monitoring proposed. Thus when a system is observed to be acting in a scale-free manner the most suitable monitoring strategy can be deployed. This paper presents two applications that use the results of this work to monitor and influence distinct layers in network topologies\",\"PeriodicalId\":239972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (EASe'07)\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (EASe'07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EASE.2007.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (EASe'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EASE.2007.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

大型分布式系统的复杂性使得自我管理和自治功能所必需的监控非常成问题。系统将按层次顺序排列,由系统的系统组成。此外,一个系统可以由在拓扑结构上与自身根本不同的系统构建而成。这意味着在系统的一个部分成功的监控策略不一定在系统的另一个部分表现良好。这项工作考虑了通过四种系统拓扑的相变,观察到发生在许多自组织系统的进化中,从规则的圆形二维晶格到无标度相位。考虑了无标度系统的最佳监测策略,提出了一种熟人监测形式。因此,当观察到系统以无标度方式运行时,可以部署最合适的监控策略。本文提出了两个应用程序,使用这项工作的结果来监视和影响网络拓扑中的不同层
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Signatures of Self-Organisation for Monitoring and Influencing Large Scale Autonomic Systems
The complexity of large distributed systems makes the monitoring, necessary for self governance and autonomic functions, very problematic. Systems will be ordered hierarchically, consisting of systems of systems. Furthermore a system may be constructed from systems that are fundamentally different in topology from itself. This means that a monitoring strategy that is successful in one part of the system will not necessarily perform well in another system sector. This work considers a phase transition through four system topologies, observed to occur in the evolution of many self organising systems, starting at a regular circular 2D lattice to a scale-free phase. The best monitoring strategy for a scale-free system is considered with a form of acquaintance monitoring proposed. Thus when a system is observed to be acting in a scale-free manner the most suitable monitoring strategy can be deployed. This paper presents two applications that use the results of this work to monitor and influence distinct layers in network topologies
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信