看跌期权和资产风险水平

Kuo-Ping Chang
{"title":"看跌期权和资产风险水平","authors":"Kuo-Ping Chang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3920521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper defines an asset’s risk as the likelihood that the asset can deliver at least a specific rate of return. Every asset which provides uncertain payoff has a corresponding put-call parity. The paper uses put option to construct the p-index to measure risk levels (likelihoods) of asset’s providing various rates of return, i.e., risk structure of asset. It shows that in the binomial case with up move and down move, (1) assets having lower down move have higher p-index, i.e., higher risk; (2) all call options have the same p-index, i.e., the same risk level, and all put options have the same p-index; and (3) underlying asset may be riskier than its put option and may have the same risk level as its call option. The trinomial example shows that the ranking of risk levels of assets’ providing different rates of returns could reverse. In the Black-Scholes-Merton model, assets having higher volatility have higher risk.","PeriodicalId":306152,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Put Option and Risk Level of Asset\",\"authors\":\"Kuo-Ping Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3920521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper defines an asset’s risk as the likelihood that the asset can deliver at least a specific rate of return. Every asset which provides uncertain payoff has a corresponding put-call parity. The paper uses put option to construct the p-index to measure risk levels (likelihoods) of asset’s providing various rates of return, i.e., risk structure of asset. It shows that in the binomial case with up move and down move, (1) assets having lower down move have higher p-index, i.e., higher risk; (2) all call options have the same p-index, i.e., the same risk level, and all put options have the same p-index; and (3) underlying asset may be riskier than its put option and may have the same risk level as its call option. The trinomial example shows that the ranking of risk levels of assets’ providing different rates of returns could reverse. In the Black-Scholes-Merton model, assets having higher volatility have higher risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3920521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3920521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将一项资产的风险定义为该资产能够提供至少一个特定收益率的可能性。每一种提供不确定收益的资产都有相应的看跌期权平价。本文利用看跌期权构造p指数来衡量资产提供不同收益率的风险水平(可能性),即资产的风险结构。结果表明,在上下移动的二项情况下,(1)下移动越小的资产p指数越高,即风险越高;(2)所有看涨期权具有相同的p指数,即相同的风险水平,所有看跌期权具有相同的p指数;(3)标的资产可能比看跌期权风险更大,并可能与看涨期权具有相同的风险水平。三叉例子表明,提供不同收益率的资产的风险水平排序可能会反转。在Black-Scholes-Merton模型中,波动性越大的资产风险越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Put Option and Risk Level of Asset
This paper defines an asset’s risk as the likelihood that the asset can deliver at least a specific rate of return. Every asset which provides uncertain payoff has a corresponding put-call parity. The paper uses put option to construct the p-index to measure risk levels (likelihoods) of asset’s providing various rates of return, i.e., risk structure of asset. It shows that in the binomial case with up move and down move, (1) assets having lower down move have higher p-index, i.e., higher risk; (2) all call options have the same p-index, i.e., the same risk level, and all put options have the same p-index; and (3) underlying asset may be riskier than its put option and may have the same risk level as its call option. The trinomial example shows that the ranking of risk levels of assets’ providing different rates of returns could reverse. In the Black-Scholes-Merton model, assets having higher volatility have higher risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信