{"title":"导弹自动驾驶仪对不确定气动鲁棒性的六种鲁棒性试验比较","authors":"K. Wise","doi":"10.2514/3.20918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The robustness of a bank-to-turn missile autopilot to uncertain aerodynamic parameters is determined using six robustness tests. The six robustness tests are: 1) small gain theorem; 2) structured singular value; 3) stability hypersphere - polynomial; 4) stability hypersphere - Lyapunov; 5) Kharitonov's theorem; and 6) multiloop stability margin. Exact parameter variation tolerances were determined by a Monte Carlo eigen analysis and are compared with the theoretical predictions.","PeriodicalId":307181,"journal":{"name":"1990 American Control Conference","volume":"54 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Six Robustness Tests Evaluating Missile Autopilot Robustness to Uncertain Aerodynamics\",\"authors\":\"K. Wise\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/3.20918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The robustness of a bank-to-turn missile autopilot to uncertain aerodynamic parameters is determined using six robustness tests. The six robustness tests are: 1) small gain theorem; 2) structured singular value; 3) stability hypersphere - polynomial; 4) stability hypersphere - Lyapunov; 5) Kharitonov's theorem; and 6) multiloop stability margin. Exact parameter variation tolerances were determined by a Monte Carlo eigen analysis and are compared with the theoretical predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1990 American Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"54 Suppl 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1990 American Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1990 American Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparison of Six Robustness Tests Evaluating Missile Autopilot Robustness to Uncertain Aerodynamics
The robustness of a bank-to-turn missile autopilot to uncertain aerodynamic parameters is determined using six robustness tests. The six robustness tests are: 1) small gain theorem; 2) structured singular value; 3) stability hypersphere - polynomial; 4) stability hypersphere - Lyapunov; 5) Kharitonov's theorem; and 6) multiloop stability margin. Exact parameter variation tolerances were determined by a Monte Carlo eigen analysis and are compared with the theoretical predictions.