在海洋之外:英国刑事案件科学证据的美国观

J. A. Moreno
{"title":"在海洋之外:英国刑事案件科学证据的美国观","authors":"J. A. Moreno","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul Roberts' and Adrian Zuckerman's ambitious new book, Criminal Evidence, applies the authors' \"contexualized approach to evidence and proof\" to study the question of how scientific evidence is used in English criminal trials. This review provides a critical read of Roberts' and Zuckerman's analysis and compares their review of the English evidentiary rules to the American law. The review also examines how the rules of evidence should change in response to the series of recent high profile exonerations that have occurred in each country.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Sea: An American View of Scientific Evidence in English Criminal Cases\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1554-4567.1031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paul Roberts' and Adrian Zuckerman's ambitious new book, Criminal Evidence, applies the authors' \\\"contexualized approach to evidence and proof\\\" to study the question of how scientific evidence is used in English criminal trials. This review provides a critical read of Roberts' and Zuckerman's analysis and compares their review of the English evidentiary rules to the American law. The review also examines how the rules of evidence should change in response to the series of recent high profile exonerations that have occurred in each country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Commentary on Evidence\",\"volume\":\"16 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Commentary on Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Commentary on Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保罗·罗伯茨(Paul Roberts)和阿德里安·祖克曼(Adrian Zuckerman)雄心勃勃的新书《犯罪证据》(Criminal Evidence),将两位作者的“证据和证明的情境化方法”应用于研究英国刑事审判中如何使用科学证据的问题。这篇评论对罗伯茨和祖克曼的分析进行了批判性解读,并将他们对英国证据规则的评论与美国法律进行了比较。审查还审查了证据规则应如何改变,以应对各国最近发生的一系列引人注目的无罪释放事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Sea: An American View of Scientific Evidence in English Criminal Cases
Paul Roberts' and Adrian Zuckerman's ambitious new book, Criminal Evidence, applies the authors' "contexualized approach to evidence and proof" to study the question of how scientific evidence is used in English criminal trials. This review provides a critical read of Roberts' and Zuckerman's analysis and compares their review of the English evidentiary rules to the American law. The review also examines how the rules of evidence should change in response to the series of recent high profile exonerations that have occurred in each country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信