自我麻醉品滥用者的定罪问题

S. Satriadi
{"title":"自我麻醉品滥用者的定罪问题","authors":"S. Satriadi","doi":"10.35673/al-bayyinah.v5i2.1825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problematics of crimination of self narcotics abusers in Law no. 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics is now an actual issue that must get a legal conclusion. The response to narcotics abuse for oneself is urgent to be interpreted in a legal framework by revealing factual and representative answers. This research is classified as normative research, the data obtained through literature study, by collecting primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis used in the form of qualitative normative then described in descriptive analytical. The findings in this study indicate that the type of crime (strafsoort) of narcotics abusers for oneself uses a single system formulation that is absolute and imperative, so that it does not provide space for judges to impose alternative punishments other than imprisonment. The duration of the sentence (strafmaat) uses a special maximum system. The punishment for group I is four years, for group II for two years and for group III for a maximum of one year, the threat of punishment is very heavy, because self narcotics abusers should prioritize coaching over imprisonment. The imposition of a criminal (strafmodus) is only imprisonment. The absence of action sanctions shows that the Narcotics Law prioritizes providing a deterrent effect rather than providing guidance to self narcotics abuser.","PeriodicalId":178562,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bayyinah","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problematics of Crimination of Self Narcotics Abusers\",\"authors\":\"S. Satriadi\",\"doi\":\"10.35673/al-bayyinah.v5i2.1825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problematics of crimination of self narcotics abusers in Law no. 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics is now an actual issue that must get a legal conclusion. The response to narcotics abuse for oneself is urgent to be interpreted in a legal framework by revealing factual and representative answers. This research is classified as normative research, the data obtained through literature study, by collecting primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis used in the form of qualitative normative then described in descriptive analytical. The findings in this study indicate that the type of crime (strafsoort) of narcotics abusers for oneself uses a single system formulation that is absolute and imperative, so that it does not provide space for judges to impose alternative punishments other than imprisonment. The duration of the sentence (strafmaat) uses a special maximum system. The punishment for group I is four years, for group II for two years and for group III for a maximum of one year, the threat of punishment is very heavy, because self narcotics abusers should prioritize coaching over imprisonment. The imposition of a criminal (strafmodus) is only imprisonment. The absence of action sanctions shows that the Narcotics Law prioritizes providing a deterrent effect rather than providing guidance to self narcotics abuser.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Bayyinah\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Bayyinah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v5i2.1825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bayyinah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v5i2.1825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第1号法对自我滥用麻醉品者的定罪问题。2009年第35号《麻醉品法案》现在是一个必须得到法律结论的实际问题。迫切需要在法律框架内解释对自己滥用麻醉品的反应,揭示事实性和代表性的答案。本研究被归类为规范性研究,通过文献研究获得的数据,通过使用法定方法和概念方法收集一级,二级和三级法律材料。分析采用定性规范的形式,然后用描述性分析的形式加以描述。本研究的结果表明,滥用麻醉品者对自己的犯罪类型(strafsoort)采用了一种绝对和必要的单一制度,因此它没有给法官施加监禁以外的其他惩罚的余地。刑期(strafmaat)使用一个特殊的最长时间系统。第一组的处罚为四年,第二组为两年,第三组最多为一年,惩罚的威胁非常重,因为自我滥用毒品者应该优先考虑指导而不是监禁。对罪犯的强制处罚只是监禁。没有采取行动制裁表明,《麻醉品法》优先考虑提供威慑作用,而不是向自我滥用麻醉品者提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problematics of Crimination of Self Narcotics Abusers
The problematics of crimination of self narcotics abusers in Law no. 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics is now an actual issue that must get a legal conclusion. The response to narcotics abuse for oneself is urgent to be interpreted in a legal framework by revealing factual and representative answers. This research is classified as normative research, the data obtained through literature study, by collecting primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis used in the form of qualitative normative then described in descriptive analytical. The findings in this study indicate that the type of crime (strafsoort) of narcotics abusers for oneself uses a single system formulation that is absolute and imperative, so that it does not provide space for judges to impose alternative punishments other than imprisonment. The duration of the sentence (strafmaat) uses a special maximum system. The punishment for group I is four years, for group II for two years and for group III for a maximum of one year, the threat of punishment is very heavy, because self narcotics abusers should prioritize coaching over imprisonment. The imposition of a criminal (strafmodus) is only imprisonment. The absence of action sanctions shows that the Narcotics Law prioritizes providing a deterrent effect rather than providing guidance to self narcotics abuser.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信