D. Borra, Daniela Portas, A. Andalò, C. Fabbri, C. Corsi
{"title":"基于LGE-MRI数据的左心房分割深度学习方法的性能比较","authors":"D. Borra, Daniela Portas, A. Andalò, C. Fabbri, C. Corsi","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantification of viable left atrial (LA) tissue is a reliable information which should be used to support therapy selection in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is employed for the non-invasive assessment of LA fibrotic tissue. Unfortunately, the analysis of LGE-MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries. This task is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability. Therefore, an automatic approach for LA wall detection would be very helpful. In this study, we compared the performance of different deep architectures - U-Net and attention U-Net (AttnU-Net) - and different loss functions - Dice loss (DL) and focal Tversky loss (FTL) to automatically detect LA boundaries from LGE-MRI data. In addition, AttnU-Net was trained without deep supervision (DS) and multi-scale inputs (MI), with DS and with DS+MI. No statistically significant differences were found training the networks with DL or FTL. U-Net was the best-performing algorithm overall, outperforming significantly AttnU-Net with a Dice Coefficient of 0.9015±0.0308 (mean ± standard deviation). However, no significant differences were found between U-Net and AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI. Based on these results, using a DL or FTL does not affect the performance and U-Net was the best-performing solution.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Left Atrium Segmentation From LGE-MRI Data\",\"authors\":\"D. Borra, Daniela Portas, A. Andalò, C. Fabbri, C. Corsi\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2020.306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantification of viable left atrial (LA) tissue is a reliable information which should be used to support therapy selection in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is employed for the non-invasive assessment of LA fibrotic tissue. Unfortunately, the analysis of LGE-MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries. This task is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability. Therefore, an automatic approach for LA wall detection would be very helpful. In this study, we compared the performance of different deep architectures - U-Net and attention U-Net (AttnU-Net) - and different loss functions - Dice loss (DL) and focal Tversky loss (FTL) to automatically detect LA boundaries from LGE-MRI data. In addition, AttnU-Net was trained without deep supervision (DS) and multi-scale inputs (MI), with DS and with DS+MI. No statistically significant differences were found training the networks with DL or FTL. U-Net was the best-performing algorithm overall, outperforming significantly AttnU-Net with a Dice Coefficient of 0.9015±0.0308 (mean ± standard deviation). However, no significant differences were found between U-Net and AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI. Based on these results, using a DL or FTL does not affect the performance and U-Net was the best-performing solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
活左房组织的定量是一个可靠的信息,应用于支持心房颤动(AF)患者的治疗选择。晚期钆增强磁共振成像(LGE-MRI)用于LA纤维化组织的非侵入性评估。不幸的是,LGE-MRI的分析依赖于手动跟踪LA边界。这个任务很耗时,而且容易在观察者之间产生很大的差异。因此,一种自动检测LA壁的方法将非常有帮助。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同深度架构——U-Net和注意力U-Net (AttnU-Net)——和不同损失函数——Dice loss (DL)和focal Tversky loss (FTL)在从大磁共振成像数据中自动检测LA边界方面的性能。此外,在没有深度监督(DS)和多尺度输入(MI)的情况下,使用DS和DS+MI对AttnU-Net进行训练。用DL或FTL训练网络没有统计学上的显著差异。U-Net是整体表现最好的算法,其Dice系数为0.9015±0.0308(平均值±标准差),显著优于AttnU-Net。而U-Net和AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI之间无显著差异。基于这些结果,使用DL或FTL不会影响性能,U-Net是性能最好的解决方案。
Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Left Atrium Segmentation From LGE-MRI Data
Quantification of viable left atrial (LA) tissue is a reliable information which should be used to support therapy selection in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is employed for the non-invasive assessment of LA fibrotic tissue. Unfortunately, the analysis of LGE-MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries. This task is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability. Therefore, an automatic approach for LA wall detection would be very helpful. In this study, we compared the performance of different deep architectures - U-Net and attention U-Net (AttnU-Net) - and different loss functions - Dice loss (DL) and focal Tversky loss (FTL) to automatically detect LA boundaries from LGE-MRI data. In addition, AttnU-Net was trained without deep supervision (DS) and multi-scale inputs (MI), with DS and with DS+MI. No statistically significant differences were found training the networks with DL or FTL. U-Net was the best-performing algorithm overall, outperforming significantly AttnU-Net with a Dice Coefficient of 0.9015±0.0308 (mean ± standard deviation). However, no significant differences were found between U-Net and AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI. Based on these results, using a DL or FTL does not affect the performance and U-Net was the best-performing solution.