青年与流动性:十字路口和新出现的问题

Anastasia Christou, Andreas Herz
{"title":"青年与流动性:十字路口和新出现的问题","authors":"Anastasia Christou, Andreas Herz","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2018.1511364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-border geographical mobility in young adulthood is often seen as a process which opens up new perspectives and allows for alternative modes of social positioning and identification, of development and relating to others. Young people are meant to search for new places and social spaces to develop and unfold. While the definition of “youth” (Luedtke, 2016) and the parameters of “mobility” (Cohen & Sirkeci, 2011) continue to be fluid and often contested, as a component of social justice and public policy, the focus on young mobiles in relation to education, training, housing, health, and employment are of particular interest in how youth are shaping their futures and the new societies they are residing in, while others are indeed not mobile. In this sense, mobility understood as movement in geographical space is not independent of social status and social mobility. Reasons for being mobile during youth can be manifold such as studying or doing voluntary work abroad, being on a student exchange, or for employment and entrepreneurial activities. In the European Union (EU), youth mobility policies have been one of the most important objectives that EU institutions have promoted in the past decade. Many programs such as Erasmus or the European Voluntary Service are meant to offer young people opportunities to move abroad. At the same time, the EU is not devoid of geographical, regional, and socio-economic inequalities (Amelina & Vasilache, 2014). As a result, critical events such as economic crises, high unemployment, and/or socioeconomic inequality between countries also foster youth mobility. Specifically amongst this constellation of social, political, and economic crises challenging and shaping European societies, the region has recently experienced one of the most significant influxes of migrants and refugees in its history. In this context, it is indeed difficult to compartmentalize youth mobiles as a general population given the inherent diversity of their ages, genders, race, ethnic and family backgrounds, status, class, socio-economic and regional origin, sexuality, dis/ability, aspirations, etc. Given such complexity of diversities involved in the discussion of youth mobiles, by extension, the specific issues, challenges, and policy implications arising from their mobilities and processes of settlement in new destinations undoubtedly vary vastly.","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth and mobility: Crossroads and emerging issues\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Christou, Andreas Herz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21931674.2018.1511364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cross-border geographical mobility in young adulthood is often seen as a process which opens up new perspectives and allows for alternative modes of social positioning and identification, of development and relating to others. Young people are meant to search for new places and social spaces to develop and unfold. While the definition of “youth” (Luedtke, 2016) and the parameters of “mobility” (Cohen & Sirkeci, 2011) continue to be fluid and often contested, as a component of social justice and public policy, the focus on young mobiles in relation to education, training, housing, health, and employment are of particular interest in how youth are shaping their futures and the new societies they are residing in, while others are indeed not mobile. In this sense, mobility understood as movement in geographical space is not independent of social status and social mobility. Reasons for being mobile during youth can be manifold such as studying or doing voluntary work abroad, being on a student exchange, or for employment and entrepreneurial activities. In the European Union (EU), youth mobility policies have been one of the most important objectives that EU institutions have promoted in the past decade. Many programs such as Erasmus or the European Voluntary Service are meant to offer young people opportunities to move abroad. At the same time, the EU is not devoid of geographical, regional, and socio-economic inequalities (Amelina & Vasilache, 2014). As a result, critical events such as economic crises, high unemployment, and/or socioeconomic inequality between countries also foster youth mobility. Specifically amongst this constellation of social, political, and economic crises challenging and shaping European societies, the region has recently experienced one of the most significant influxes of migrants and refugees in its history. In this context, it is indeed difficult to compartmentalize youth mobiles as a general population given the inherent diversity of their ages, genders, race, ethnic and family backgrounds, status, class, socio-economic and regional origin, sexuality, dis/ability, aspirations, etc. Given such complexity of diversities involved in the discussion of youth mobiles, by extension, the specific issues, challenges, and policy implications arising from their mobilities and processes of settlement in new destinations undoubtedly vary vastly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Social Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Social Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1511364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1511364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青年时期的跨国界地理流动往往被视为一种进程,它开辟了新的视角,并允许社会定位和认同、发展和与他人有关的其他模式。年轻人注定要寻找新的地方和社会空间来发展和展现。虽然“青年”的定义(Luedtke, 2016)和“流动性”的参数(Cohen & Sirkeci, 2011)作为社会正义和公共政策的一个组成部分,仍然是不稳定的,而且经常受到争议,但与教育、培训、住房、健康和就业有关的年轻人流动的关注,对年轻人如何塑造他们的未来和他们所居住的新社会特别感兴趣,而其他人确实没有流动。从这个意义上说,流动性被理解为地理空间的运动,并不独立于社会地位和社会流动性。在青年时期流动的原因可以是多方面的,例如在国外学习或从事志愿工作,参加学生交换,或就业和创业活动。在欧盟(EU),青年流动政策是欧盟机构在过去十年中推动的最重要目标之一。许多项目,如伊拉斯谟或欧洲志愿服务,旨在为年轻人提供移居国外的机会。与此同时,欧盟并非没有地理、区域和社会经济不平等(Amelina & Vasilache, 2014)。因此,经济危机、高失业率和/或国家间社会经济不平等等重大事件也会促进青年流动。特别是在挑战和塑造欧洲社会的社会、政治和经济危机中,该地区最近经历了其历史上最重大的移民和难民涌入之一。在这种情况下,鉴于青年流动人口的年龄、性别、种族、民族和家庭背景、地位、阶级、社会经济和地区出身、性别、残疾/能力、愿望等固有的多样性,确实很难将其划分为一般人口。考虑到青年流动讨论的复杂性和多样性,因此,他们在新目的地的流动和定居过程所产生的具体问题、挑战和政策影响无疑差别很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Youth and mobility: Crossroads and emerging issues
Cross-border geographical mobility in young adulthood is often seen as a process which opens up new perspectives and allows for alternative modes of social positioning and identification, of development and relating to others. Young people are meant to search for new places and social spaces to develop and unfold. While the definition of “youth” (Luedtke, 2016) and the parameters of “mobility” (Cohen & Sirkeci, 2011) continue to be fluid and often contested, as a component of social justice and public policy, the focus on young mobiles in relation to education, training, housing, health, and employment are of particular interest in how youth are shaping their futures and the new societies they are residing in, while others are indeed not mobile. In this sense, mobility understood as movement in geographical space is not independent of social status and social mobility. Reasons for being mobile during youth can be manifold such as studying or doing voluntary work abroad, being on a student exchange, or for employment and entrepreneurial activities. In the European Union (EU), youth mobility policies have been one of the most important objectives that EU institutions have promoted in the past decade. Many programs such as Erasmus or the European Voluntary Service are meant to offer young people opportunities to move abroad. At the same time, the EU is not devoid of geographical, regional, and socio-economic inequalities (Amelina & Vasilache, 2014). As a result, critical events such as economic crises, high unemployment, and/or socioeconomic inequality between countries also foster youth mobility. Specifically amongst this constellation of social, political, and economic crises challenging and shaping European societies, the region has recently experienced one of the most significant influxes of migrants and refugees in its history. In this context, it is indeed difficult to compartmentalize youth mobiles as a general population given the inherent diversity of their ages, genders, race, ethnic and family backgrounds, status, class, socio-economic and regional origin, sexuality, dis/ability, aspirations, etc. Given such complexity of diversities involved in the discussion of youth mobiles, by extension, the specific issues, challenges, and policy implications arising from their mobilities and processes of settlement in new destinations undoubtedly vary vastly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信