多次MRI增强检查患者钆造影剂潴留的比较

R. Fisher, V. Jain, J. Glaab, Aubrey McMillan
{"title":"多次MRI增强检查患者钆造影剂潴留的比较","authors":"R. Fisher, V. Jain, J. Glaab, Aubrey McMillan","doi":"10.5220/0008909101090115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Gadolinium-based contrast agents have long been utilized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance image quality. Aside from the few reported cases of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in patients with severely compromised renal function, these contrast agents have generally been viewed as safe. However, recent studies have shown evidence of the retention of potentially toxic gadolinium well beyond the previously recognized clearing times in patients with normal renal function. This retention has been shown via persistent hyper-intense signal in certain brain regions in unenhanced MRI exams. The exact form of retained gadolinium and its long-term potential health effects remain unknown at this time. Due to concerns over retained gadolinium, our hospital switched to a more stably bound contrast agent in the spring of 2018. This study examined brain MRI images from patients with multiple contrast-enhanced exams using either the older, more unstable, linear agent, and the newer, more stable, macrocyclic agent. Signal intensities were measured in the globus pallidus and dentate nucleus; regions of the brain that have previously been shown to accumulate heavy metals such as gadolinium. Statistically significant increases in signal intensity were seen in the dentate nucleus in the linear contrast agent group, but not in the macrocyclic agent group. No significant signal increases were seen with either agent in the globus pallidus region of the brain. No correlation was seen between signal increase and the volume of contrast agent administered for either region or contrast agent.","PeriodicalId":162397,"journal":{"name":"Bioimaging (Bristol. Print)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Gadolinium Contrast Agent Retention in Patients Receiving Multiple Contrast-enhanced MRI Exams\",\"authors\":\"R. Fisher, V. Jain, J. Glaab, Aubrey McMillan\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0008909101090115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Gadolinium-based contrast agents have long been utilized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance image quality. Aside from the few reported cases of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in patients with severely compromised renal function, these contrast agents have generally been viewed as safe. However, recent studies have shown evidence of the retention of potentially toxic gadolinium well beyond the previously recognized clearing times in patients with normal renal function. This retention has been shown via persistent hyper-intense signal in certain brain regions in unenhanced MRI exams. The exact form of retained gadolinium and its long-term potential health effects remain unknown at this time. Due to concerns over retained gadolinium, our hospital switched to a more stably bound contrast agent in the spring of 2018. This study examined brain MRI images from patients with multiple contrast-enhanced exams using either the older, more unstable, linear agent, and the newer, more stable, macrocyclic agent. Signal intensities were measured in the globus pallidus and dentate nucleus; regions of the brain that have previously been shown to accumulate heavy metals such as gadolinium. Statistically significant increases in signal intensity were seen in the dentate nucleus in the linear contrast agent group, but not in the macrocyclic agent group. No significant signal increases were seen with either agent in the globus pallidus region of the brain. No correlation was seen between signal increase and the volume of contrast agent administered for either region or contrast agent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioimaging (Bristol. Print)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioimaging (Bristol. Print)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0008909101090115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioimaging (Bristol. Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0008909101090115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钆基造影剂长期以来被用于磁共振成像(MRI)以提高图像质量。除了少数报道的肾功能严重受损患者肾源性全身性纤维化病例外,这些造影剂通常被认为是安全的。然而,最近的研究表明,在肾功能正常的患者中,潜在毒性钆的滞留时间远远超过了先前认为的清除时间。在非增强MRI检查中,这种保留通过大脑某些区域持续的高强度信号显示出来。残留钆的确切形式及其对健康的长期潜在影响目前尚不清楚。由于担心残留钆,我们医院在2018年春季改用了一种结合更稳定的造影剂。本研究使用较老的、更不稳定的线性剂和较新、更稳定的大环剂,检查了多次对比增强检查患者的脑MRI图像。测量苍白球和齿状核的信号强度;大脑的某些区域先前已被证明会积聚重金属,如钆。线性造影剂组齿状核的信号强度有统计学意义的增加,而大环造影剂组则没有。两种药物在大脑苍白球区域均未见明显的信号增加。信号的增加和注射造影剂的剂量没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Gadolinium Contrast Agent Retention in Patients Receiving Multiple Contrast-enhanced MRI Exams
: Gadolinium-based contrast agents have long been utilized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance image quality. Aside from the few reported cases of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in patients with severely compromised renal function, these contrast agents have generally been viewed as safe. However, recent studies have shown evidence of the retention of potentially toxic gadolinium well beyond the previously recognized clearing times in patients with normal renal function. This retention has been shown via persistent hyper-intense signal in certain brain regions in unenhanced MRI exams. The exact form of retained gadolinium and its long-term potential health effects remain unknown at this time. Due to concerns over retained gadolinium, our hospital switched to a more stably bound contrast agent in the spring of 2018. This study examined brain MRI images from patients with multiple contrast-enhanced exams using either the older, more unstable, linear agent, and the newer, more stable, macrocyclic agent. Signal intensities were measured in the globus pallidus and dentate nucleus; regions of the brain that have previously been shown to accumulate heavy metals such as gadolinium. Statistically significant increases in signal intensity were seen in the dentate nucleus in the linear contrast agent group, but not in the macrocyclic agent group. No significant signal increases were seen with either agent in the globus pallidus region of the brain. No correlation was seen between signal increase and the volume of contrast agent administered for either region or contrast agent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信